Scrat wrote:By the way, I'm still waiting for you to do so. Your citation doesn't do anything to educate me as to WHICH right or rights you claim they have been denied
Basically, I'm claiming that all of the rights I cited have been violated. By "basically" I mean that if you assume that one of these rights hasn't been violated, it follows that another one of them has. At least that's what I'm claiming.
Scrat wrote: (assuming you provide that information) you have done nothing to show that they remained entitled to that right (those rights) given their status as un-uniformed enemy combatants captured during wartime.
Number one: I posted "that information" to the thread in form of an excerpt. I posted a link to the full text of the document so you can check it for any conspicious omissions I might have made. If that "does nothing to educate" you, what else am I supposed to do? I can
post the stuff for you, but I can't
read it for you.
Number two: They remained entitled to those rights because Article 2 says that
everyone is entitled to them. Certainly the prisoners in Camp X-ray are a subset of "everyone". As you can check by following my above link, the declaration doesn't specify any circumstances under which people forfeit their human rights. Neither does any body of international law, to the best of my knowledge. But proving a negative is usually hard to impossible, and this point is no exception. I haven't read every single international law in existence myself.
May I therefore suggest that you swallow a bit of your own medicine and come up with an international law that does make such exception? Certainly the fact that you "find this notion absurd" doesn't qualify as evidence.
-- Thomas