Agnostic vs Atheist

Two people in a house. There is a pie on the counter.
person A goes to the bathroom. When He returns the pie is gone.
Person B has pie filling on his lips, and crumbs on his shirt.
Did person B eat the pie? Since nobody saw it you can never know.
Coming to any conclusion would be foolhardy, because there is no absolute proof.
Right frank? That about sum it up?

Personally I see no need to construct scenarios. Somebody brings you a load of nothing and challenges you to prove it isn't something got to have bats in the belfry.

I would suppose it all depends on what one is willing to consider as valid evidence.

Wrong, Frank. Without evidence, they decided there's a deity. In short, claiming nothing is something. You are deluded by inability to grasp that simple fact.

The point is, spirituality, deism, are cooked up inside the imagination. The reason the concepts, though erroneous, are so powerful, is because man is a territorial animal, and the imagination can house territories as big as reality [to the human mind]. A territorial being will fight to the death for the concept, which is why you and the deists become so ferocious in these threads.