1
   

'The Star Spangled Banner'

 
 
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 04:40 pm
Unless you know all four stanzas of the Star Spangled Banner you may find this interesting. Perhaps most of you didn't realize what Francis Scott Key's profession was or what he was doing on a ship. This is a good brush-up on your history.


BY DR. ISAAC ASIMOV

(Editor's Note- Near the end of his life the great science fiction author Isaac Asimov wrote a short story about the four stanzas of our national anthem. However brief, this well-circulated piece is an eye opener from the dearly departed doctor......)


I have a weakness -- I am crazy, absolutely nuts, about our national anthem. The words are difficult and the tune is almost impossible, but frequently when I'm taking a shower I sing it with as much power and emotion as I can. It shakes me up every time.

I was once asked to speak at a luncheon. Taking my life in my hands, I announced I was going to sing our national anthem -- all four stanzas. This was greeted with loud groans. One man closed the door to the kitchen, where the noise of dishes and cutlery was loud and distracting. "Thanks, Herb," I said.

"That's all right," he said. "It was at the request of the kitchen staff."

I explained the background of the anthem and then sang all four stanzas. Let me tell you, those people had never heard it before -- or had never really listened. I got a standing ovation. But it was not me; it was the anthem.

More recently, while conducting a seminar, I told my students the story of the anthem and sang all four stanzas. Again there was a wild ovation and prolonged applause. And again, it was the anthem and not me.

So now let me tell you how it came to be written.

In 1812, the United States went to war with Great Britain, primarily over freedom of the seas. We were in the right. For two years, we held off the British, even though we were still a rather weak country. Great Britain was in a life and death struggle with Napoleon. In fact, just as the United States declared war, Napoleon marched off to invade Russia. If he won, as everyone expected, he would control Europe, and Great Britain would be isolated. It was no time for her to be involved in an American war.

At first, our seamen proved better than the British. After we won a battle on Lake Erie in 1813, the American commander, Oliver Hazard Perry, sent the message, "We have met the enemy and they are ours." However, the weight of the British navy beat down our ships eventually. New England, hard-hit by a tightening blockade, threatened secession.

Meanwhile, Napoleon was beaten in Russia and in 1814 was forced to abdicate. Great Britain now turned its attention to the United States, launching a three-pronged attack.

The northern prong was to come down Lake Champlain toward New York and seize parts of New England.

The southern prong was to go up the Mississippi, take New Orleans and paralyze the west.

The central prong was to head for the mid-Atlantic states and then attack Baltimore, the greatest port south of New York. If Baltimore was taken, the nation, which still hugged the Atlantic coast, could be split in two. The fate of the United States, then, rested to a large extent on the success or failure of the central prong.

The British reached the American coast, and on August 24, 1814, took Washington, D.C. Then they moved up the Chesapeake Bay toward Baltimore. On September 12, they arrived and found 1,000 men in Fort McHenry, whose guns controlled the harbor. If the British wished to take Baltimore, they would have to take the fort.

On one of the British ships was an aged physician, William Beanes, who had been arrested in Maryland and brought along as a prisoner. Francis Scott Key, a lawyer and friend of the physician, had come to the ship to negotiate his release.

The British captain was willing, but the two Americans would have to wait. It was now the night of September 13, and the bombardment of Fort McHenry was about to start.

As twilight deepened, Key and Beanes saw the American flag flying over Fort McHenry. Through the night, they heard bombs bursting and saw the red glare of rockets. They knew the fort was resisting and the American flag was still flying. But toward morning the bombardment ceased, and a dread silence fell. Either Fort McHenry had surrendered and the British flag flew above it, or the bombardment had failed and the American flag still flew.

As dawn began to brighten the eastern sky, Key and Beanes stared out at the fort, trying to see which flag flew over it. He and the physician must have asked each other over and over, "Can you see the flag?"

After it was all finished, Key wrote a four stanza poem telling the events of the night. Called "The Defense of Fort McHenry," it was published in newspapers and swept the nation. Someone noted that the words fit an old English tune called, "To Anacreon in Heaven" -- a difficult melody with an uncomfortably large vocal range. For obvious reasons, Key's work became known as "The Star Spangled Banner," and in 1931 Congress declared it the official anthem of the United States.

Now that you know the story, here are the words. Presumably, the old doctor is speaking. This is what he asks Key:

Oh! say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?


And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
Oh! say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

("Ramparts," in case you don't know, are the protective walls or other elevations that surround a fort.) The first stanza asks a question. The second gives an answer:

On the shore, dimly seen thro' the mist of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep.
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?


Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream
'Tis the star-spangled banner. Oh! long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

("The towering steep" is again, the ramparts. The bombardment has failed, and the British can do nothing more but sail away, their mission a failure. In the third stanza, I feel Key allows himself to gloat over the American triumph. In the aftermath of the bombardment, Key probably was in no mood to act otherwise.)


During World War II, when the British were our staunchest allies, this third stanza was not sung. However, I know it, so here it is:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footstep's pollution.


No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave,
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

(The fourth stanza, a pious hope for the future, should be sung more slowly than the other three and with even deeper feeling):

Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war's desolation,
Blest with victory and peace, may the Heaven - rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.


Then conquer we must, for our cause is just,
And this be our motto --"In God is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

I hope you will look at the national anthem with new eyes. Listen to it, the next time you have a chance, with new ears. Pay attention to the words. And don't let them ever take it away . not even one word of it.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,986 • Replies: 18
No top replies

 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 06:05 pm
I can't verify this and all I'm getting from Google is a bunch of blogs and news groups. I strongly suspect this is a wishful thinking type of essay. For me the dead giveaway is always the last part:
Quote:
I hope you will look at the national anthem with new eyes. Listen to it, the next time you have a chance, with new ears. Pay attention to the words. And don't let them ever take it away . not even one word of it.


That kind of rah-rah patriotism does not seem characteristic of Asimov but it is characteristic of one of these wishful thinking pieces, where a deceased authority figure is used as the cover for an essay by some unknown. Anyway, here's a link to my research: Google search, lots of key words used

According to Wikipedia, "In the closing years of his life, Asimov blamed the deterioration of the quality of life that he perceived in New York City on the shrinking tax base caused by middle class flight to the suburbs." Doesn't sound terribly rah-rah to me. However, in all fairness, Wikipedia does state that Asimov was interested in history.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 08:56 pm
I agree, Jes, that the last sentence, at least, doesn't sound a bit like ole Ikey Asimov. Much of the rest of it does, though. i suspect the "editor" who makes a statement at the start of the article may have inserted an editorial comment as a kind of coda.
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 04:58 am
I've seen this kind of stuff a lot online, where what may very well be a legit piece is coopted by one group or another in order to forward its agenda, or a not-so legit piece is shoved into a legit piece or is given a legit author's name attached to it (often this is a person who is dead and the provenance is murky, e. g. "at a seminar, Martin Van Buren said ...").

I checked snopes and they didn't have anything on it, but it's possible that this piece hasn't made it to them yet.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 05:52 am
jespah wrote:
According to Wikipedia, "In the closing years of his life, Asimov blamed the deterioration of the quality of life that he perceived in New York City on the shrinking tax base caused by middle class flight to the suburbs." Doesn't sound terribly rah-rah to me. However, in all fairness, Wikipedia does state that Asimov was interested in history.

He is also interested in interpreting texts, and a a two-volume Bible interpretation by him is available at Amazon. Also, the style of this article does sound a lot like Asimov's speeches, laudatios, and book introductions to me (his fiction is more formal). Also, the patriotism expressed in the text is not unusual among immigrants from communist countries, no matter how critical they may be on specific American policies. Overall, I see no reason to doubt that this piece is genuine. If it's a fake, it's a good one.

Edit: The oldest citation I could find (Word File) is Reader's Digest, vol 141 (84) page 75-78, July 1992. There's probably an older one as Readers Digest rarely commissions original articles. But it's old enough to be fairly sure it's genuine.

Edit again: On re-reading the thread, it becomes clear I have missed Jespah's point about sandwiching authentic quotes between non-authentic ones, and selling the whole package as authentic. It's a valid point, and may well be correct.

Last edit, I promise: The original citation, according to more or less contemporary Usenet posts, is Isaac Asimov: All Four Stanzas, Fantasy & Science Fiction, Volume 80 (3) March, 1991, pp. 133-142. I'd check the citation, but don't think our libraries here in Munich have this magazine stocked.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 02:34 pm
Great research work, Thomas. So it's probably largely authentic, with some editorial comment inserted.
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 02:41 pm
Thanks for researching, Thomas.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 02:48 pm
Thomas wrote:
The original citation, according to more or less contemporary Usenet posts, is Isaac Asimov: All Four Stanzas, Fantasy & Science Fiction, Volume 80 (3) March, 1991, pp. 133-142. I'd check the citation, but don't think our libraries here in Munich have this magazine stocked. (emphasis added)


This is exactly the kind of typcial Bavarian laziness which lead to the rise of Hitler. Don't you people ever learn ? ! ? ! ?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:36 pm
Setanta wrote:
Thomas wrote:
The original citation, according to more or less contemporary Usenet posts, is Isaac Asimov: All Four Stanzas, Fantasy & Science Fiction, Volume 80 (3) March, 1991, pp. 133-142. I'd check the citation, but don't think our libraries here in Munich have this magazine stocked. (emphasis added)


This is exactly the kind of typcial Bavarian laziness which lead to the rise of Hitler. Don't you people ever learn ? ! ? ! ?


Dammit, don't you know the difference between Swabia and Bayern?
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:38 pm
I take that back. München is certainly in Bavaria. But I seem to recall someone once describing Thomas as being from Swabia.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 01:01 am
Returning to the text of the anthem, I do find it odd that you Americans sing your national anthem all the time, baseball game after baseball game. But every time you end it with a question -- "does the star spangled banner still wave?" -- and then nobody sings the part when the question gets answered. The stadium announcer doesn't even give the singers a simple "yes" or "no" answer. This doesn't make any sense at all. I can easily see why Asimov wrote this interpretation.

By the way, there is a nice piece of viral information I came across while researching. It's a story about a foreign spy who had assumed an American identity. He was found out because he knew all four stanzas of the star-spangled banner, which the cops found is extremely unusual among real Americans. Does anybody know if there's any truth to that story?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 01:18 am
The above essay containis an error, to wit:

"During World War II, when the British were our staunchest allies..."

This is a tad too USA-centric for British tastes. Mr Bush of course has stated that WWII began in Hawaii ....
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 01:24 am
McTag wrote:
The above essay containis an error, to wit:

"During World War II, when the British were our staunchest allies..."

This is a tad too USA-centric for British tastes. Mr Bush of course has stated that WWII began in Hawaii ....

Can you name a stauncher ally the USA had?

Another point: Asimov also says "for our cause is just" instead of when. This does look like a mutation of the article that, even if false, would be appreciated and kept alive in a conservative blogging environment.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 01:35 am
Thomas wrote:
McTag wrote:
The above essay containis an error, to wit:

"During World War II, when the British were our staunchest allies..."

This is a tad too USA-centric for British tastes. Mr Bush of course has stated that WWII began in Hawaii ....

Can you name a stauncher ally the USA had?



I think you're missing my slightly tongue-in cheek point. We were grateful for the help.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 01:58 am
McTag wrote:
I think you're missing my slightly tongue-in cheek point. We were grateful for the help.

I've been in too many political threads lately. (Of course, without that help, we would be conversing on the Reichs-Welt-Netzseite now -- in German. A tempting thought. Wink )
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 02:05 am
Zweifellos.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 02:18 am
Would be a very different Zeitgeist ... or zeitgiest, as our follow A2K'ers mostly name it :wink:
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 03:29 am
I wonder if the star-spangled banner could become America's national anthem today. The third stanza seems to contain hate speech, the fourth entangles church and state. Maybe it's a good thing Americans don't know them.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 05:30 am
Rather interesting that the words were written in 1815 (?) but nobody thought of making the song the National Anthem until the 1930s. No, Thomas, I personally know of no one who actually knows all four stanzas of the song. If that story about the spy who gave himself away through his erudition is not true, it ought to be.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 'The Star Spangled Banner'
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 05:09:44