0
   

Ann Coulter Attacks 9/11 Widows

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:45 pm
LW, You'll have to forgive ticomaya the lowyer who tries to speak authoritively on politics and films that are always based on subjective analysis.

His offerings such as "plankboard" and "you seem to despise" are all right-wingnut vocabulary without any basis in fact, value or reality.


If his worthless contributions to a2k is anything like how he performs as a lowyer, I'm not sure how he makes a living.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:45 pm
What the hell does any Supreme Court decision have to do with the subjectivity of politics? Not only that, if you believe all of the judges are wholly objective in their position, wouldn't it follow through that they would be unanimous in their decisions? Law is not a perfect science -- if you think it is, you've got a serious problem.

Every great film has found it's way to the discount bin. There's no reason to put "Brokeback Mountain" in any discount bin anytime soon as it was one of the phenominal best sellers in DVD's this year. You've displayed, once again, a total ignorance of the art of the film and the business of filmmaking.

Guess, what -- last years Oscar winner is already being heavily disounted and in bargain bins. "Crash" crashed in DVD sales over a slight surge after the awards.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:46 pm
(Now I think you should go put your nose into Ann Coulter's business, but you will have to have knee pads).
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:49 pm
I think Mr. Imposter is quite mistaken. Ticomaya is not a lowyer.

Try to get it straight!!!
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:52 pm
You're stating you used the word denouement? Come on -- your now down to bottom-of-the-barrel, carping, petty ranting.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:54 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
LW, You'll have to forgive ticomaya the lowyer who tries to speak authoritively on politics and films that are always based on subjective analysis.


Please try to follow along a little more closely, c.i. ... if you're going to comment, that is. I'm not sure that will make your postings any more coherent, but it can't hurt.

It is Lightwizard who tries to speak authoritatively concerning films that are always based on subjective analysis.

Quote:
His offerings such as "plankboard" and "you seem to despise" are all right-wingnut vocabulary without any basis in fact, value or reality.



Laughing "Plankboard" is a word you seem to have invented all on your own. Please do not attribute it to me.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:55 pm
I don't think Mr. Light Wizard knows what he is talking about-

Every great film has found it's way to the discount bin. There's no reason to put "Brokeback Mountain" in any discount bin anytime soon as it was one of the phenominal best sellers in DVD's this year. You've displayed, once again, a total ignorance of the art of the film and the business of filmmaking.
I found Brokeback in a discount bin at my local Blockbuster. Would you like to know the names of films I have never found in my local Blockbuster.

But, I must agree with you, Mr. Light Wizard, there are some great films, that because of neanderthal opinions in our bigoted country, have never made it. Can anyone seriously douibt that "The Bareback Way"(2003) has been totally overlooked even though it is one of the most daring and sensuous movies of our time?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:55 pm
Putting one's nose in Coulter's business! Please, not before dinner.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:56 pm
Somehow, I don't think Mr. Light Wizard would ever do that!
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:57 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
You're stating you used the word denouement? Come on -- your now down to bottom-of-the-barrel, carping, petty ranting.


No, I certainly did NOT use the word. And that, frankly, was the only clue in your post that your comment must NOT be directed towards me ... unless you were smoking some shrooms at the time. Then I had to search a bit to find exactly what and whom you were talking about. And instead of your pathetic little attempt at deflection here, you ought to just mea culpa and admit your post was less than clear. But the chances of that happening are slim to none, it appears.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:58 pm
ticomaya, Sorry, but I have difficulty with your use of words; "plankboard" is the best I can do for now, unless you care to correct me.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:20 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ticomaya, Sorry, but I have difficulty with your use of words; "plankboard" is the best I can do for now, unless you care to correct me.


I said: "I think his point is that perhaps you should remove the plank out of your own eye." LINK

Sorry you had difficulty with those words. You might try dictionary.com.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:33 pm
Naw, it's just that you don't offer anything worth remembering.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:42 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Naw, it's just that you don't offer anything worth remembering.


So you make up words to fill the void? Interesting.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:45 pm
You see, Ticomaya, you have been firmly put in your place.

Unless Mr.Imposter is in the early stages of dementia, which may be why he can't remember anything you said that is worthwhile.

Since I have no symptoms of forgetfulness. Ticomaya, let me assure you that I remember many of your great posts, especially some you wrote in response to the Canadian Mounted Policeman.

They were great!!
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:48 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Lightwizard wrote:
You're stating you used the word denouement? Come on -- your now down to bottom-of-the-barrel, carping, petty ranting.


No, I certainly did NOT use the word. And that, frankly, was the only clue in your post that your comment must NOT be directed towards me ... unless you were smoking some shrooms at the time. Then I had to search a bit to find exactly what and whom you were talking about. And instead of your pathetic little attempt at deflection here, you ought to just mea culpa and admit your post was less than clear. But the chances of that happening are slim to none, it appears.

Smoking some shrooms?

Good god, man, what have you been smoking?

And is this thread still about Ann Coulter? It seems to have fallen far off the beaten path regarding Ann Coulter's idiocy, stupidity, and trailer trash bigotry.

Anyway, here's some more on Ann Coulter:

http://mediamatters.org/static/images/home/coulter-20060727.jpg
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 05:24 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Lightwizard wrote:
You're stating you used the word denouement? Come on -- your now down to bottom-of-the-barrel, carping, petty ranting.


No, I certainly did NOT use the word. And that, frankly, was the only clue in your post that your comment must NOT be directed towards me ... unless you were smoking some shrooms at the time. Then I had to search a bit to find exactly what and whom you were talking about. And instead of your pathetic little attempt at deflection here, you ought to just mea culpa and admit your post was less than clear. But the chances of that happening are slim to none, it appears.

Smoking some shrooms?

Good god, man, what have you been smoking?


A Cohiba. What about you?

http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/1706/smokingmushroomsmv6.gif
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 06:02 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Lightwizard wrote:
You're stating you used the word denouement? Come on -- your now down to bottom-of-the-barrel, carping, petty ranting.


No, I certainly did NOT use the word. And that, frankly, was the only clue in your post that your comment must NOT be directed towards me ... unless you were smoking some shrooms at the time. Then I had to search a bit to find exactly what and whom you were talking about. And instead of your pathetic little attempt at deflection here, you ought to just mea culpa and admit your post was less than clear. But the chances of that happening are slim to none, it appears.

Smoking some shrooms?

Good god, man, what have you been smoking?


A Cohiba. What about you?

http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/1706/smokingmushroomsmv6.gif

It depends; are you tweaking or tripping? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 06:13 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
It depends; are you tweaking or tripping? :wink:


Sorry ... I don't live in San Francisco. I'm afraid I'm not familiar with your drug culture terms.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 08:22 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Dookiestix wrote:
It depends; are you tweaking or tripping? :wink:


Sorry ... I don't live in San Francisco. I'm afraid I'm not familiar with your drug culture terms.

As I don't live in the "heartland," I am not familiar with your cigar terms. :wink:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 02:08:14