0
   

Ann Coulter Attacks 9/11 Widows

 
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 10:51 am
Incidentally, BTW, I think this is deja vu as far as African Americans to which I was blithely accuses of perhaps being racits. Several of my lighting and fine art clients are black and I went with a black person for over two years out of college. He's now high up in the Disney organization whereas then, he was one of the Disney characters at Disneyland. No, silly, he wasn't Cinderella.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 03:52 pm
It occurred to me that gays denied the right to marry should be entitled to an exemption from taxation. After all, the state is denying them the right accorded to others. I guess this would not obtain legally, but the demand for exemption might help others see the very basic right being denied to these people.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 09:07 pm
Well, I wouldn't hold my breath on that one -- you'll likely turn blue. Nice thought, though, rational and humanistic. The irrationality of the politicians in Washington who have now been held hostage by the Bible thumping, holier-than-though, judgemental assholes in this world is astounding. It's the right and the left who want to kiss their asses for votes. I don't have much use for any of the two-bit lawyers who couldn't make it in private practice and so run for office. I know that's a generalization but not much of a generalization. It's like those who can't do, teach.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 09:08 pm
Well, I wouldn't hold my breath on that one -- you'll likely turn blue. Nice thought, though, rational and humanistic. The irrationality of the politicians in Washington who have now been held hostage by the Bible thumping, holier-than-thou, judgemental a-holes in this world is astounding. It's the right and the left who want to kiss their asses for votes. I don't have much use for any of the two-bit lawyers who couldn't make it in private practice and so run for office. I know that's a generalization but not much of a generalization. It's like those who can't do, teach.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Jul, 2006 10:34 pm
It is clear that Mr. Light Wizard does not read the papers:

I will replicate, an article from the No one with a heart can read this without crying. It is a shame and an abomination which reflects poorly on the neanderthal judges appointed by President Bush and the hard hearted MEDIA who did not put this all important story on the front pages where it belongs:

Wash. Court Upholds Gay Marriage Ban
Washington Supreme Court upholds state's ban on gay marriage

OLYMPIA, Wash., Jul. 27, 2006
By CURT WOODWARD Associated Press Writer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(AP)



(AP) The Washington Supreme Court upheld the state's ban on gay marriage Wednesday, dealing the gay rights movement its second major defeat in less than a month in another liberal-leaning state that had been regarded as a promising battleground.

Massachusetts is still the only state that allows same-sex couples to wed.

In a 5-4 decision, the court said lawmakers have the power to restrict marriage to a man and a woman, and it left intact the state's 1998 Defense of Marriage Act.

Earlier this month, New York's high court dealt gay couples a similar blow when it upheld a state law against gay marriage.

Wednesday's ruling surprised and delighted gay-marriage opponents, given Washington state's liberal politics, particularly in Seattle.

"This is more than we could have imagined. We are shocked, and pleasantly shocked. We were prepared for the other direction," said Jon Russell, field director for the conservative Faith and Freedom Network.

Disappointment was perhaps greatest in Seattle, home of the state's most visible gay community.

"There aren't words to describe how hurt people in the gay and lesbian community are. There's a lot of tears and a lot of anger right now. Emotion is raw," said state Rep. Ed Murray, a Seattle Democrat and one of four openly gay state lawmakers.

The state Supreme Court overruled two lower courts that had found the ban violated the Washington Constitution's "privileges and immunities" section.

The gay-marriage ban "is constitutional because the Legislature was entitled to believe that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers procreation, essential to survival," Justice Barbara Madsen wrote in the controlling opinion.

However, Madsen and other members of the majority invited the Legislature to take another look at the "clear hardship" that the ban causes for same-sex couples.

In a dissent, Justice Mary Fairhurst said the majority improperly bowed to public opinion. "Unfortunately, the (majority) are willing to turn a blind eye to DOMA's discrimination because a popular majority still favors that discrimination," she wrote.

The 19 gay and lesbian couples who sued to overturn the law were dismayed by the ruling.

"I believe that our constitution should treat all of its citizens the same, and in this case the court was willing to treat my family differently than other families," said Brenda Bauer of Seattle, who sued along with her partner, Celia Castle. "Today's a pretty sad day for our family."

Leaders in the Legislature and Gov. Chris Gregoire _ all Democrats _ did not commit themselves to any course of action.

"Just as the public is divided over the issue, so is the Legislature," said Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown. Gregoire said: "The Supreme Court has ruled, and we must accept their decision whether we agree with it or not."

In Seattle, King County Executive Ron Sims, who backed the push to legalize marriage for same-sex couples, said his next step would be to press for civil unions. They give gay couples many of the rights that come with marriage and are allowed in Vermont and Connecticut.

"There's still hope in the long run," Sims said. "I still dream for a just society."

Forty-five states have laws banning marriage between same-sex couples or limiting marriage to between a man and a woman.

In other recent rulings on the issue, courts reinstated voter-approved bans on gay marriage in Nebraska and Georgia, and Tennessee's Supreme Court ruled that voters there should have a say on allowing marriage for same-sex couples.

END OF QUOTE

Bigotry is alive and well. The only hope is that someone with real insight into the rights of man will be elected president. I am sure that Hillary Rodham Clinton would not shy away from nominating a gay person to the next Supreme Court Vacancy. That might be the only hope left!!!!
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 11:42 am
Passage of bills like this will force all gays to become straight! Gay men will marry women! The scourge of homosexuality on our planet will grind to a halt! From now on we will have only men-women combinations! Isn't bigotry GREAT???
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:01 pm
I guess that the next step for the right will be to burn witches at the stake.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:14 pm
Advocate wrote:
I guess that the next step for the right will be to burn witches at the stake.


Of course not, there is no such thing as witches. Talk about trying to push things to the extreme. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:19 pm
There are no witches in this article. These things really happened and the question--which no one seems able to handle is WHY?

************************************************************
I will replicate, an article from the No one with a heart can read this without crying. It is a shame and an abomination which reflects poorly on the neanderthal judges appointed by President Bush and the hard hearted MEDIA who did not put this all important story on the front pages where it belongs:

Wash. Court Upholds Gay Marriage Ban
Washington Supreme Court upholds state's ban on gay marriage

OLYMPIA, Wash., Jul. 27, 2006
By CURT WOODWARD Associated Press Writer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(AP)



(AP) The Washington Supreme Court upheld the state's ban on gay marriage Wednesday, dealing the gay rights movement its second major defeat in less than a month in another liberal-leaning state that had been regarded as a promising battleground.

Massachusetts is still the only state that allows same-sex couples to wed.

In a 5-4 decision, the court said lawmakers have the power to restrict marriage to a man and a woman, and it left intact the state's 1998 Defense of Marriage Act.

Earlier this month, New York's high court dealt gay couples a similar blow when it upheld a state law against gay marriage.

Wednesday's ruling surprised and delighted gay-marriage opponents, given Washington state's liberal politics, particularly in Seattle.

"This is more than we could have imagined. We are shocked, and pleasantly shocked. We were prepared for the other direction," said Jon Russell, field director for the conservative Faith and Freedom Network.

Disappointment was perhaps greatest in Seattle, home of the state's most visible gay community.

"There aren't words to describe how hurt people in the gay and lesbian community are. There's a lot of tears and a lot of anger right now. Emotion is raw," said state Rep. Ed Murray, a Seattle Democrat and one of four openly gay state lawmakers.

The state Supreme Court overruled two lower courts that had found the ban violated the Washington Constitution's "privileges and immunities" section.

The gay-marriage ban "is constitutional because the Legislature was entitled to believe that limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers procreation, essential to survival," Justice Barbara Madsen wrote in the controlling opinion.

However, Madsen and other members of the majority invited the Legislature to take another look at the "clear hardship" that the ban causes for same-sex couples.

In a dissent, Justice Mary Fairhurst said the majority improperly bowed to public opinion. "Unfortunately, the (majority) are willing to turn a blind eye to DOMA's discrimination because a popular majority still favors that discrimination," she wrote.

The 19 gay and lesbian couples who sued to overturn the law were dismayed by the ruling.

"I believe that our constitution should treat all of its citizens the same, and in this case the court was willing to treat my family differently than other families," said Brenda Bauer of Seattle, who sued along with her partner, Celia Castle. "Today's a pretty sad day for our family."

Leaders in the Legislature and Gov. Chris Gregoire _ all Democrats _ did not commit themselves to any course of action.

"Just as the public is divided over the issue, so is the Legislature," said Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown. Gregoire said: "The Supreme Court has ruled, and we must accept their decision whether we agree with it or not."

In Seattle, King County Executive Ron Sims, who backed the push to legalize marriage for same-sex couples, said his next step would be to press for civil unions. They give gay couples many of the rights that come with marriage and are allowed in Vermont and Connecticut.

"There's still hope in the long run," Sims said. "I still dream for a just society."

Forty-five states have laws banning marriage between same-sex couples or limiting marriage to between a man and a woman.

In other recent rulings on the issue, courts reinstated voter-approved bans on gay marriage in Nebraska and Georgia, and Tennessee's Supreme Court ruled that voters there should have a say on allowing marriage for same-sex couples.

END OF QUOTE

Bigotry is alive and well. The only hope is that someone with real insight into the rights of man will be elected president. I am sure that Hillary Rodham Clinton would not shy away from nominating a gay person to the next Supreme Court Vacancy. That might be the only hope left!!!!
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:33 pm
Hey Possum, what are you wearing?
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:42 pm
BernardR wrote:

I will replicate...


And replicate and replicate...
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:53 pm
Baldimo wrote:
Advocate wrote:
I guess that the next step for the right will be to burn witches at the stake.


Of course not, there is no such thing as witches. Talk about trying to push things to the extreme. Rolling Eyes


No witches Baldimo? Are you sure? The Bible says there are witches, right BernardR (Mporter)? These things really happened BernardR (mporter). Why?

Victims of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692

Every victim was an unfortunate tragedy of the Salem Witch Trials. Some were hanged, others died in prison while awaiting trial. One was even pressed to death. This page lists the victims, when they perished and how it happened.

Hanged on June 10

Bridget Bishop, Salem

Hanged on July 19

Sarah Good, Salem Village

Rebecca Nurse, Salem Village

Susannah Martin, Amesbury

Elizabeth How, Ipswich

Sarah Wilds, Topsfield

Hanged on August 19

George Burroughs, Wells, Maine

John Proctor, Salem Village

John Willard, Salem Village

George Jacobs, Sr., Salem Town

Martha Carrier, Andover

Pressed to death on September 19

Giles Corey, Salem Farms,

Hanged on September 22

Martha Corey, Salem Farms

Mary Eastey, Topsfield

Alice Parker, Salem Town

Ann Pudeater, Salem Town

Margaret Scott, Rowley

Wilmott Reed, Marblehead

Samuel Wardwell, Andover

Mary Parker, Andover

Other accused witches that were not hanged, but died in prison:

Sarah Osborne, Salem Village

Roger Toothaker, Billerica

Lyndia Dustin, Reading

Ann Foster, Andover

Thirteen others may have also died in prison, but sources conflict on the exact number.
http://www.salemwitchtrials.com/victims.html
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 12:56 pm
Deut. 18:10-12,
There shall not be found among you any one that ... uses divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer, for all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 01:24 pm
Well, the only witch I know of is Hillary Rodham Clinton and I am not even sure that she was called a witch. I think the word began with a "b".
0 Replies
 
Dizzy Delicious
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 01:27 pm
mesquite wrote:
Baldimo wrote:
Advocate wrote:
I guess that the next step for the right will be to burn witches at the stake.


Of course not, there is no such thing as witches. Talk about trying to push things to the extreme. Rolling Eyes


No witches Baldimo? Are you sure? The Bible says there are witches, right BernardR (Mporter)? These things really happened BernardR (mporter). Why?

Victims of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692

Every victim was an unfortunate tragedy of the Salem Witch Trials. Some were hanged, others died in prison while awaiting trial. One was even pressed to death. This page lists the victims, when they perished and how it happened.

Hanged on June 10

Bridget Bishop, Salem

Hanged on July 19

Sarah Good, Salem Village

Rebecca Nurse, Salem Village

Susannah Martin, Amesbury

Elizabeth How, Ipswich

Sarah Wilds, Topsfield

Hanged on August 19

George Burroughs, Wells, Maine

John Proctor, Salem Village

John Willard, Salem Village

George Jacobs, Sr., Salem Town

Martha Carrier, Andover

Pressed to death on September 19

Giles Corey, Salem Farms,

Hanged on September 22

Martha Corey, Salem Farms

Mary Eastey, Topsfield

Alice Parker, Salem Town

Ann Pudeater, Salem Town

Margaret Scott, Rowley

Wilmott Reed, Marblehead

Samuel Wardwell, Andover

Mary Parker, Andover

Other accused witches that were not hanged, but died in prison:

Sarah Osborne, Salem Village

Roger Toothaker, Billerica

Lyndia Dustin, Reading

Ann Foster, Andover

Thirteen others may have also died in prison, but sources conflict on the exact number.
http://www.salemwitchtrials.com/victims.html


By the way, when did "hung" become
"hanged"?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 01:29 pm
Dizzy, you are a silly goose but I suppose you know that already.
0 Replies
 
Dizzy Delicious
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 01:41 pm
I flyed out to left field, because I didn't flew to left field.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 01:58 pm
Dizzy Delicious wrote:
I flyed out to left field, because I didn't flew to left field.
The thing about flies is that when you brain is empty you may forget to zip up but you should really be more aware of zipping down first.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 03:02 pm
I think anyone writing anything relating to religion or the Bible specifically avoid the word "hung."

http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000278.htm

Beware the grammar police -- their gun is loaded with bs.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Jul, 2006 03:16 pm
Ann Maggot Coulter says that Gore is a total fag. To his discredit, Chris Matthews sucks up to her and says he wants her back on his show.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200607280001?src=other
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 07:02:40