blatham wrote:
Quote:The "quote" you pasted is incomplete, according to your first link above.
tico:
Quote:You mean its "incomplete" because the quote I pasted did not include the following at its beginning: "If the small businesses suck they'll be driven out of business. If they got a good restaurant, people will go there and eat. ..."
<insert>
It is relevant to what follows, not discursive, so why edit it out? I mean, other than it being a statement of economic theory with which American conservatives might find clear agreement and empathy? And why edit without the proper protocol to make it clear there has been an excision? (Neither of the first two links work now, by the way)
blatham:
Quote:The second and third links make no reference to it that I could find and are actually the same piece carried on two sites.
tico:
Quote:They are indeed the same piece, but they certainly do make reference to the quote.
Sorry, missed it. I remember the 'find' function intermittently.
blatham:
Quote:I can't credit this as a verbatim quote of something Moore said as there is no way to verify accuracy (another person present, for instance).
Tico:
Quote:Really? Unless there is a third-party witness, available for cross-examination, you distrust the veracity of every quote you read? Does this distrust of direct quotations extend to quotes of Bush, or just leftists you are trying to defend?
For a prosecutor, that's a somewhat ingenuous response. Outside of some verification means or source, we grant credence to a second party's account through estimation of bias and motive, and through considering that party's track record on veracity, and through comparing what it is claimed was said by the first party with other statements made by him/her. And if we are going to pass such a statement on to others, then, if we have integrity, we acknowledge the uncertainty of the account's completeness or accuracy.
Here's some further information on the column...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/649620/posts
So, why would you and others of your political leaning bother passing on this account in any case? Moore makes an argument regarding some positives accruing from free enterprise which are in accordance with your own notions. Are you suggesting Moore is a hypocrite and the evidence for that is that he's not an unrelenting or unquestioning anti-business dogmatist?
Or are you hoping for rhetorical mileage because he uses the term "redneck"? Or because he (reportedly) spoke negatively of certain aspects of small town, small businesses in America. Perhaps you hoped to imply anti-Americanism?