Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 12:33 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Since we are talking about Noah and the Ark, kind of, I have a question. What does everyone think of the recent possible find of Noah's ark?

If you haven't heard yet, I can find the link.


It's wood that's been found.


Wonder though if it might not be the true cross rather than an ark.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 12:35 pm
Doktor S wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
Setanta wrote:
There is no void. Science cannot be accused of suffering from a void because it does not attempt to be what it is not.

Exactly. What rex is saying is no different than saying a toaster 'suffers from a void' because it can't also keep your beer cold.
Rather ridiculous (lack of)reasoning if you ask me.


Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Way to completely miss the point.

Quote:

When is this stuff ever going to click with some of you?

Perhaps if you shared the drugs you were taking when you thought it up?


No real substance to your replies. What point, that science is dumb?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 12:38 pm
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
So, you know this, Rex, because you talk to "God," and she answers?


Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Comment:
When is this stuff ever going to click with some of you?


That is a complete nonsequitur. You asserted that: Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Science is not "smart" or "dumb," it is a term which describes a method for researching naturalistic explanations of the cosmos. Therefore, i asked you how you could know this, unless you are speaking with "God." If you assert that you talk to it, and it answers you, then we're on different ground. None of that is answered, however by a reference to Pauline orthodoxy as expressed in a letter on the subject of the nature of someone Paul never met, and for whom there is not even good evidence that the individual ever existed.

So, to push all of your tripe to the side, how do you know that "science is dumb," and how do you know it is foolish to argue with "the creator." More to the point, how do you know that there is a creator?

It's never going to "click" with me unless and until you can make a plausible argument for your imaginary friend. And don't trot out any more of your scriptural absurdities, you know all those boys would have hated you anyway for your sexual preference.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 12:43 pm
RexRed wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
Setanta wrote:
There is no void. Science cannot be accused of suffering from a void because it does not attempt to be what it is not.

Exactly. What rex is saying is no different than saying a toaster 'suffers from a void' because it can't also keep your beer cold.
Rather ridiculous (lack of)reasoning if you ask me.


Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Way to completely miss the point.

Quote:

When is this stuff ever going to click with some of you?

Perhaps if you shared the drugs you were taking when you thought it up?


No real substance to your replies. What point, that science is dumb?

Ok then, let me spell it out, step by step, so that you can understand.
First, you are asserting that science is somehow deficient because it does not allow for/incorporate the supernatural.
Second, it has been established that science is a tool, only concerned with material and empirical matters.
Third, I compared your assertion to a toaster, which serves a specific function, being expected to serve a completely different function to fulfil it's toaster-ness. I was hoping this would open your eyes to the ridiculousness of your original assertion.
Do you understand yet?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:07 pm
Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Setanta wrote:
So, you know this, Rex, because you talk to "God," and she answers?


Galatians 3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Comment:
When is this stuff ever going to click with some of you?


That is a complete nonsequitur. You asserted that: Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Science is not "smart" or "dumb," it is a term which describes a method for researching naturalistic explanations of the cosmos. Therefore, i asked you how you could know this, unless you are speaking with "God." If you assert that you talk to it, and it answers you, then we're on different ground. None of that is answered, however by a reference to Pauline orthodoxy as expressed in a letter on the subject of the nature of someone Paul never met, and for whom there is not even good evidence that the individual ever existed.

So, to push all of your tripe to the side, how do you know that "science is dumb," and how do you know it is foolish to argue with "the creator." More to the point, how do you know that there is a creator?

It's never going to "click" with me unless and until you can make a plausible argument for your imaginary friend. And don't trot out any more of your scriptural absurdities, you know all those boys would have hated you anyway for your sexual preference.


Set, your questions show that you are firmly placed in the little box that science has conveniently made for you.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:11 pm
Doktor S wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Doktor S wrote:
Setanta wrote:
There is no void. Science cannot be accused of suffering from a void because it does not attempt to be what it is not.

Exactly. What rex is saying is no different than saying a toaster 'suffers from a void' because it can't also keep your beer cold.
Rather ridiculous (lack of)reasoning if you ask me.


Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Way to completely miss the point.

Quote:

When is this stuff ever going to click with some of you?

Perhaps if you shared the drugs you were taking when you thought it up?


No real substance to your replies. What point, that science is dumb?

Ok then, let me spell it out, step by step, so that you can understand.
First, you are asserting that science is somehow deficient because it does not allow for/incorporate the supernatural.
Second, it has been established that science is a tool, only concerned with material and empirical matters.
Third, I compared your assertion to a toaster, which serves a specific function, being expected to serve a completely different function to fulfil it's toaster-ness. I was hoping this would open your eyes to the ridiculousness of your original assertion.
Do you understand yet?


No... I don't understand.

Science is not deficient because it does not "allow" but it cannot allow because the spiritual realm is not subject to the laws of science neither indeed can be.

As for the toaster, I am sorry if I have underestimated my toaster.

You have overestimated science.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:12 pm
Perhaps, all this time, the problem is that rex has been working under a completely different definition of science than the rest of us.

At this point I'm pretty sure rex must think science is some living entity, conscious of it's actions and freely making decisions to oppress the minds of people everywhere.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:14 pm
Quote:

You have overestimated science.

You still don't get it.
Science does what it does, and that's all it does.
You are the only one that seems to think it should do more.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:31 pm
Doktor S wrote:
Perhaps, all this time, the problem is that rex has been working under a completely different definition of science than the rest of us.

At this point I'm pretty sure rex must think science is some living entity, conscious of it's actions and freely making decisions to oppress the minds of people everywhere.


Science is a corporation, I am not sure what your definition of science is but somehow I think it involves rose colored glasses.
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:41 pm
Quote:

Science is a corporation

Wow. I was kidding, but it seems I was not far off the mark.


Please, please, re-aquaint yourself with the definition of science the rest of us use before your next tangent, mmk?

wikipedia wrote:

Science in the broadest sense refers to any knowledge or trained skill, especially (but not exclusively) when this is attained by verifiable means.[1] The word science also describes any systematic field of study or the knowledge gained from such study. In a more restricted sense, science refers to a system of acquiring knowledge based on empiricism, experimentation, and methodological naturalism, as well as to the organized body of knowledge humans have gained by such research

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:42 pm
Rex wrote:
Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Smart you say. God's solution to all problems is to kill everyone; kill them all; men, women, children and infants.

Look at the Flood for example. God was angry because his creation wouldn't listen to him. So what's his intelligent solution?

KILL EM ALL. He even killed the animals because, well they were wicked as well.

I guess people like you like that kind of stuff. Nice, direct, simple and barbaric.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 01:58 pm
Science is manmade; The Truth is God made. :wink:
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 02:05 pm
And I suppose the slaughter of innocents is God's glorious truth.

Praise the Lord and kill them all.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 02:08 pm
xingu wrote:
Rex wrote:
Considering how dumb science is and how smart God is, yes, it is ridiculous and foolish to argue with the creator.

Smart you say. God's solution to all problems is to kill everyone; kill them all; men, women, children and infants.

Look at the Flood for example. God was angry because his creation wouldn't listen to him. So what's his intelligent solution?

KILL EM ALL. He even killed the animals because, well they were wicked as well.

I guess people like you like that kind of stuff. Nice, direct, simple and barbaric.


When you study the Bible you find the devil actually caused the flood...
So where does that leave your animosity toward God considering it was the "true" God who saved Noah and his family (thus the human race and possibly all life as we know it).
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 02:10 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Science is manmade; The Truth is God made. :wink:


You are God made too... Smile
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 02:13 pm
No use xingu. It's like arguing with five year old kids.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 02:14 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
No use xingu. It's like arguing with five year old kids.


Don't give yourself that much credit. Laughing
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 04:15 pm
So, now, an event of worldwide importance which has left no evidenceand is the basis of lots of the claptrap that guys like rex buy into without any evidence or testable proof, it has now been caused by another mythical creature who we toss off all the badstuff.
Dont you have some trouble stayin up with all your own bullshit there rex?

Im concerened because only 2 consitions can logically prevail
1Your own touch on reality is less than tangential
or
2 You think that were dumb enough to buy your tales of the supernatural.

Im betting on number 1.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 05:10 pm
farmerman wrote:
So, now, an event of worldwide importance which has left no evidenceand is the basis of lots of the claptrap that guys like rex buy into without any evidence or testable proof, it has now been caused by another mythical creature who we toss off all the badstuff.
Dont you have some trouble stayin up with all your own bullshit there rex?

Im concerened because only 2 consitions can logically prevail
1Your own touch on reality is less than tangential
or
2 You think that were dumb enough to buy your tales of the supernatural.

Im betting on number 1.


There is a third condition too FM...

That you are wrong.

That science is dumb and the only tool for measuring the spirit is spirit... of which seems at least on the surface to have eluded you.

If you try to measure eternity with a tape measure than you will always come up short.

You are concerned only with the finite.

You call this science but science cannot prove the infinite because it is immeasurable.

Now I say the immeasurable is measured by the human heart not science, and by the breath of understanding that only the infinite can spiritually impart.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Jul, 2006 05:16 pm
RexRed wrote:

Now I say the immeasurable is measured by the human heart not science, and by the breath of understanding that only the infinite can spiritually impart.


The human heart cannot measure anything. It is a pump.

When a person uses the term "known by the human heart"...they are trying to disguise the fact that whatever they are supposing is known by the human heart...

...simply cannot be known.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bible vs. Science
  3. » Page 16
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.13 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 12:24:02