spendius wrote:You're missing the point Frank.
I honestly hope not.
One of the reasons there is so much arguing past each other on this issue...is that Life and others like him...simply will not deal with the point argued in that last post of mine....and argued earlier by Joe.
This pregnancy is occurring in an individual woman's body.
It is a unique situation in life.
If the woman decides to terminate that pregnancy...she should have the right to do so. There are no rights this zygote, embryo, or fetus has that should one-up her rights.
Life, and the others in his camp, keep going back to the "it is a separate life" argument. But the struture of the situation is such that even if that argument prevails...SO WHAT!!!
It is happening in an individual woman's body...and where is it written that the woman, upon having an egg fertilized in her body, gives up any rights over that body????
In any case, I doubt any of us on the pro-choice side think we will ever get people like Life to change...and there is nothing wrong with that from either side of the debate. But those of us on this side feel every bit as strongly about protecting a woman's right to decide to continue a pregnancy or terminate it...as Life's side feels about protecting what they see as a living human being.
As for the "living human being"...and considering so much of that side is motivated by religious concerns...what is the lose to the being?
It doesn't get to live a few years on planet Earth...and according to most of the anti-choice proponents...gets a free pass into Heaven where it will live in unbridled joy for all of eternity.
As raw-deals go...it ain't the worst anyone's ever gotten.