1
   

Corruption as an issue in the 2006 US elections

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 10:07 pm
http://www.bls.gov/cps/minwage2002tbls.htm

The majority are NOT teenagers. Only 28% are teenagers.

47% of those earning min wage are over the age of 25.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 Aug, 2006 10:18 pm
Our analysis of 2003 U.S. Census data shows that, of 7.8 million American workers receiving an hourly wage of less than $6.65 an hour?-the immediate beneficiaries of a change in the minimum wage?-only 15 percent are currently living in poverty. Nearly three-quarters of these workers, 72 percent to be precise, have a family income that is at least 50 percent higher than the poverty line, and over half belong to families earning double the poverty level. One fifth of low-income workers belong to families earning over $80,000 annually.[1]The average family income of the typical low-wage worker was a respectable $40,000 per year.

Only 15% are living in poverty....

The average family income of the typical low-wage worker was a respectable $40,000 a year.
0 Replies
 
Dghs48
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 10:36 am
Why not just raise the minimum waqge4 to $50 an hour and wipe out poverty? Lyndon Johnson would be proud.

An alternative might be for the government to get out of the way and let the market decide wages.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Aug, 2006 11:46 am
Bernard, and your point is ...[?]
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 02:46 am
Our analysis of 2003 U.S. Census data shows that, of 7.8 million American workers receiving an hourly wage of less than $6.65 an hour?-the immediate beneficiaries of a change in the minimum wage?-only 15 percent are currently living in poverty. Nearly three-quarters of these workers, 72 percent to be precise, have a family income that is at least 50 percent higher than the poverty line, and over half belong to families earning double the poverty level. One fifth of low-income workers belong to families earning over $80,000 annually.[1]The average family income of the typical low-wage worker was a respectable $40,000 per year.

Only 15% are living in poverty....

The average family income of the typical low-wage worker was a respectable $40,000 a year.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Aug, 2006 08:17 am
Bernard, your piece refers to "our analysis" of census data. Who is "our?"
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Thu 31 Aug, 2006 02:36 am
Testimony before the US House of Representatives----\


The Economic Effects of the Minimum Wage
by Paul Kersey
Testimony

May 3, 2004 | |



Testimony of

Paul Kersey

Bradley Visiting Fellow

Before the House of Representatives; Small Business Committee; Subcommittee on Workforce, Empowerment, and Government Programs

Regarding

The Economic Effects of the Minimum Wage
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Sep, 2006 11:49 am
Since Bernard seems incapable of citing his sources, here it is.
I mistakenly thought that someone of his capacity would not try to pass off the research of others as his own, as he so frequently does.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Sep, 2006 01:53 pm
Quote:
For AK Scandal Company, Money Can't Buy Happiness -- But Influence? Perhaps.
By Justin Rood - September 1, 2006, 12:16 PM
When FBI agents raided the offices of Alaska Senate President Ben Stevens and five other legislators, they were looking for evidence of improper ties between those state lawmakers and a company called VECO Corp.

That left some scratching their heads. What's VECO?

Based in Alaska, the privately-owned, non-union company deals primarily in petroleum and petroleum-related services; its estimated revenue in 2004 was $500 million, and it employs around 5,000 people worldwide. That's small by oil megacorporation standards, but it's big in Alaska, where the company has been called "a titan in the Alaskan oil industry."

VECO has over two dozen subsidiaries, but it likes to spend money on influence. It's the top campaign contributor to both Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) and its congressman, Don Young (R).

And although it's only the second-biggest contributor to Sen. Ted Stevens (R), with over $70,000 in donations to the senior senator from VECO employees (according to FECInfo.com), it keeps close ties to Stevens in other ways.

For one, it's dumped $25,000 into his "Northern Lights" political action committee. The company also paid his state Senator son, Ben (he of the raided office) over $200,000 for various reported purposes, including lobbying his father. What's more, the son of VECO president Pete Lethard was reported to work for Stevens in Washington, D.C.

Also, the company briefly owned the Anchorage Times; in 1992 it shut the paper down, and switched to funding a half-page of editorials in the Anchorage Daily News. The section, called "Voice of the Times," is reportedly devoted to "conservative," "pro-industry" views.
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001455.php
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Sep, 2006 03:37 pm
B, that smacks of bigtime corruption. I hope the pols in Alaska pay a big price in that matter. Thanks!
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 3 Sep, 2006 03:50 am
Candidone1 wrote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since Bernard seems incapable of citing his sources, here it is.
I mistakenly thought that someone of his capacity would not try to pass off the research of others as his own, as he so frequently does.

I AM VERY MUCH AFRAID THAT CANDIDONE IS UNABLE TO READ SINCE IN THE PARAGRAPH JUST ABOVE HIS POST I LISTED MY SOURCE>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Testimony before the US House of Representatives----\


The Economic Effects of the Minimum Wage
by Paul Kersey
Testimony

May 3, 2004 | |



Testimony of

Paul Kersey

Bradley Visiting Fellow

Before the House of Representatives; Small Business Committee; Subcommittee on Workforce, Empowerment, and Government Programs

Regarding

The Economic Effects of the Minimum Wage


Is Candidone also suffering from the hypoxic effects of having stents placed in his chest after he had a heart attack?
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 09:27 am
Cheney to stump for GOPer who bullied wife with guns

RAW STORY
Published: Tuesday September 12, 2006

Vice President Dick Cheney will be attending a fundraiser for Rep. Randy Kuhl (R-NY) in late September, today's issue of Roll Call reports.

The Vice President and Kuhl have each earned a measure of infamy for incidents involving firearms. Cheney accidentally shot his hunting partner Harry Whittington in the face earlier this year, while according to divorce records obtained by RAW STORY, Kuhl once bullied his wife with shotguns. RAW STORY has archived the divorce filing here

The San Francisco Chronicle noted in a 2004 article that Kuhl had past run-ins with the law, including an arrest in 1997 for drunken driving. Kuhl's license was suspended for six months:

Kuhl-Peterson filed for divorce in late 1998, charging that Kuhl "endangered (her) mental and physical well-being and rendered it unsafe and improper for the parties to continue to reside together." After Kuhl was arrested in 1997 for drunken driving, he refused his wife's requests "to attend counseling to deal with his excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages," she said in the papers. As a result of that arrest, Kuhl had his driver's license suspended for six months. He launched his congressional campaign bid by publicly discussing the arrest.
Kuhl is considered a vulnerable incumbent in the mid-term election.

Excerpts from the registration-restricted article follow...

#
If readers recall, widely reported divorce records showed that Kuhl, currently running for his second term, pulled not one but two shotguns on his wife during a 1994 dinner party at their home. Kuhl's ex-wife also described him as an abusive drunk who "hustled women."

Cheney, the man who may always be remembered for accidentally shooting his good friend on a hunting trip, has agreed to do a private photo-op at a Sept. 22 fundraiser for Kuhl in Rochester, N.Y. And, yes, you guessed it, Kuhl is considered vulnerable this year.

As one Democratic operative told HOH, "I can't tell what Cheney likes best about him?-Kuhl's penchant for rubber-stamping the president or for combining beer with firearm use."
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 02:57 pm
blueflame -- It looks like Cheney and Kuhl have a lot in common.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Sep, 2006 04:11 pm
I guess Kuhl believes in the right to bear arms. OSD is probably an admirer.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Sep, 2006 03:40 am
What a disgusting crowd these people are.

Quote:
Interior Official Assails Agency for Ethics Slide

WASHINGTON, Sept. 13 ?- The Interior Department's chief official responsible for investigating abuses and overseeing operations accused the top officials at the agency on Wednesday of tolerating widespread ethical failures, from cronyism to cover-ups of incompetence.

"Simply stated, short of a crime, anything goes at the highest levels of the Department of the Interior," charged Earl E. Devaney, the Interior Department's inspector general, at a hearing of the House Government Reform subcommittee on energy.

"I have observed one instance after another when the good work of my office has been disregarded by the department," he continued. "Ethics failures on the part of senior department officials ?- taking the form of appearances of impropriety, favoritism and bias ?- have been routinely dismissed with a promise ?'not to do it again.' "...


While these leases were the specific focus of the hearing, Mr. Devaney directed most of his criticism at what he called a broader organizational culture at the Interior Department of denial and "defending the indefensible."

He expressed particular fury at the willingness to dismiss two dozen potential ethical lapses by J. Steven Griles, a former industry lobbyist who served as deputy secretary of the interior during President Bush's first term.

Mr. Griles resigned after allegations surfaced that he pushed policy decisions that favored some of his former oil and gas industry clients and that he tried to steer a $2 million contract to a technology firm that had also been one of his clients.
link
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Sep, 2006 08:48 am
Blatham, that is an important piece, which should be proclaimed in newspaper headlines. Note that the agency is headed by a former industry lobbyist.

The number of lobbyists in Washington doubled between 2000 and 2005, to 35,000. The government is bought and paid for.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 05:26 pm
Quote:
Analysis: Scandal again testing GOP

Republicans decided long ago their party won't pay a significant price at the polls for the scandal spawned by lobbyist Jack Abramoff. It's a proposition likely to be tested anew in the aftermath of Rep. Bob Ney's agreement to plead guilty to corruption charges.

Within minutes of the disclosure of Ney's signed plea bargain papers on Friday, House Democrats circulated a list meant to suggest guilt by association. It highlighted the names of more than 60 Republican incumbents who have accepted political donations from the six-term lawmaker.

"Americans are ready for a new direction this November because it's time for a Congress that will put the American people's interests ahead of the special interests," said Rep. Rahm Emanuel (news, bio, voting record), the Illinois Democrat who chairs his party's campaign organization.

Republicans said that as a national strategy, ethics was a non-starter.

"I don't know of any member of Congress who's lost because of something another member did or didn't do," said Carl Forti, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee.

"We saw how well the corruption message worked for Democrats in California," he said, a reference to a Republican victory earlier in the year in a special election to succeed convicted GOP Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, now in prison.

There's evidence to suggest Forti might be right, so far at least.

Beyond attacking Republicans verbally for presiding over a "culture of corruption," Democrats have made little if any effort to exploit the spectacle of once-powerful Republicans confessing crimes.

Officials in both parties said they knew of only one candidate, Zack Space, who has aired a television commercial on the issue of corruption so far in the campaign. He is running in the district Ney has represented since 1994.

That doesn't mean individual lawmakers haven't paid a political price ?- or may soon.

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay resigned earlier in the year. He had close ties to Abramoff, and is under indictment in Texas on campaign finance charges.

Another Republican, Sen. Conrad Burns of Montana is in a difficult re-election race, in part because of his ties to Abramoff and roughly $150,000 in donations he received from the lobbyist and his clients and his associates. Burns has returned the money or donated it to charity.

Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., has long lived under a legal cloud. Two men have been convicted in a probe in which he is involved, his congressional office was searched for evidence and the FBI says it found $90,000 in bribe money in a freezer in his home. The congressman denies wrongdoing.

The political calculation by GOP strategists has been evident for months, and became clear when their drive to enact far-reaching ethics legislation cratered.

Within days of Abramoff's guilty plea, a Capitol competition of sorts broke out as lawmakers in both parties and both houses of Congress scrambled to declare their support for far-reaching ethics legislation. [..]

Within a few months, the Senate passed a bipartisan bill banning senators and staff from receiving meals and gifts from lobbyists.

The Republican-controlled House voted along party lines for a bill that allowed privately funded travel as long as two-thirds of the ethics committee approved it in advance. A Democratic call for tougher measures failed.

Then gridlock gained control.

In a move designed to thwart Democratic chances at the polls, House Republicans had included a provision to crack down on a type of independent political organizations known as 527 committees. Unlike the parties and most groups, they are allowed to raise money in unlimited amounts from donors whose identities may remain secret.

Senate Democrats threatened to filibuster. They were joined by a small group of Senate Republicans, some of them maneuvering for favor among the 527 groups in advance of the 2008 presidential campaign.

Despite a steady stream of convictions ?- involving two former senior congressional aides, a former Interior Department employee and a one-time aide at the General Services Administration ?- the drive to enact legislation was doomed.

Now, with lawmakers likely to adjourn in two weeks for the elections, the list of reform measures is not a long one.

The House voted last February to bar former lawmakers-turned-lobbyists from the House floor and gym.

At the time, Rep. David Dreier, R-Calif., called the changes "the first step toward our reform package."

Or not.

On Thursday, the House voted to require lawmakers to identify the special projects they slip into legislation. It's a temporary change only, subject to ratification when the new Congress convenes in January.
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 10:48 am
blatham wrote:
What a disgusting crowd these people are.



link


Quote:
The blistering attack was part of Mr. Devaney's report on what he called the Interior Department's "bureaucratic bungling" of oil and gas leases signed in the late 1990's, mistakes that are now expected to cost the government billions of dollars but were covered up for six years.

<<<<<snip>>>>>>

Mr. Devaney's broadside against the Interior Department's culture dovetailed with his tentative conclusions in his most recent investigation, into how the department had managed to sign 1,100 leases for offshore drilling that inadvertently let energy companies escape billions of dollars in royalties on gas and oil produced in the Gulf of Mexico.

The leases, signed in 1998 and 1999 during the Clinton administration, allow companies to escape normal federal royalties ?- usually 12.5 percent of sales ?- on the tens of millions of barrels of oil on each lease.

The royalty break was intended as an incentive for deepwater drilling, but it was also supposed to end if oil prices climbed above a "threshold" level of about $34 a barrel. The leases at issue omitted that restriction, and department officials kept quiet about their mistake for six years after they discovered it.


Which disgusting crowd do you refer to? Those incompetent fools of the Clinton administration who created the mess? Or the fools of the Bush administration who failed to correct the mistakes of the previous administration? While both should be faulted, the Clinton administration clearly deserves the greatest recriminations.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Sep, 2006 09:38 pm
Silk, so your view is that if Clinton did it then it is OK for Bush and the other Republicans.

Wow!
0 Replies
 
slkshock7
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 05:45 am
Advocate wrote:
Silk, so your view is that if Clinton did it then it is OK for Bush and the other Republicans.

Wow!


Advocate,

I said no such thing. In fact, I specifically stated that "both should be faulted..." Are you arguing that the sleeping watchdog should be more harshly punished than the burglar? Double Wow!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/05/2026 at 02:49:30