Brandon9000 wrote:I'm saying that a war not being won quickly and easily proves neither that it shouldn't have been commenced, nor that it's being implemented poorly. Go ahead and try to change the subject again, if that's your best strategy.
Oh, but the subject of this thread isn't "War in Iraq shouldn't have been commenced, is implemented poorly". It is "Bush backs brother Jeb for White House." People here are making fun of George W. Bush's war rhetoric because it reflects his administration's culture of suppressing inconvenient truths, and of smearing and firing people for pointing them out.
The memory of this culture may well make American voters decline to vote for a president Jeb Bush. Pointing this out is not "changing the subject". It is an important part of the subject.