McGentrix wrote:It's much more peaceful now without anon-voter barging in with his chickenhawk spiel.
Making these comments is nothing more then an attempt to make war-supporters appear as hypocrits. They do nothing more than raise ire and provoke those who support the war.
It's bait.
anon voter just lost his wife. not like you'd give a ****....he'll be back...
McGentrix wrote:kickycan wrote:McGentrix wrote:kickycan wrote:McGentrix wrote:kickycan wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:D'artagnan wrote:I think Brandon just reassured himself about something that may have been bothering him...
When you can't dispute the logic, attack the poster.
And when the poster is a moron, all the better.
Isn't there a thread on fat truck drivers you should be attending kickycan?
Why, are you looking for your real father?
Lame. I thought you could do better than that.
Lame my ass. That was gold, Jerry, Gold!!!
It was lame. You should have said "Why? Do you need me to find your real father?" At least that would have stayed in context. As it is, it just looks like a feeble attempt to try to "get" me.
Not your best work.
As usual, you haven't got a clue what you're talking about.
So here's the general pattern - most of the conservatives post expositions of their opinions, and most of the liberals make jokes about the conservatives' character, never daring to actually take on their ideas.
Brandon9000 wrote:So here's the general pattern - most of the conservatives post expositions of their opinions, and most of the liberals make jokes about the conservatives' character, never daring to actually take on their ideas.
that's because we don't find you worthy of a serious post..... comic fodder.... you guys serve a noble purpose :wink:
McGentrix wrote:blueveinedthrobber wrote:McGentrix wrote:It's much more peaceful now without anon-voter barging in with his chickenhawk spiel.
Making these comments is nothing more then an attempt to make war-supporters appear as hypocrits. They do nothing more than raise ire and provoke those who support the war.
It's bait.
anon voter just lost his wife. not like you'd give a ****....he'll be back...
Too bad.
I feel certain you mean too bad he'll be back and not too bad about his wife. Is that a correct assumption?
Roxxxanne wrote:I can always count oun Brandy for a daily chuckle or two. Thanks Brandy!
There's a port on a western bay
And it serves a hundred ships a day
Lonely sailors pass the time away
And talk about their homes
And there's a girl, in this harbor town
And she works, laying whiskey down
They say "Brandy, fetch another round"
She serves them whiskey and wine
The sailors say "Brandy, you're a fine girl
What a good wife you would be
Yeah your eyes could steal a sailor
From the sea."
Brandy, wears a braided chain
Made of finest silver from the north of Spain
A locket, that bears the name
Of a man that Brandy loved
He came, on a summer's day
Bringing gifts, from far away
But he made it clear, he couldn't stay
No harbor was his home
The sailors said "Brandy, you're a fine girl
What a good wife you would be
But my life, my lover, my lady
Is the sea."
Yeah Brandy used to watch his eyes when he told his sailor's story
She could feel the ocean fall and rise, she saw it's raging glory
But he had always told the truth, Lord he was an honest man
And Brandy does her best to understand
At night, when the bars close down
Brandy walks through a silent town
And loves a man, who's not around
She still can hear him say, she hears him say
"Brandy, you're a fine girl
What a good wife you would be
But my life, my lover, my lady
Is the sea"
"Brandy, you're a fine girl
What a good wife you would be
But my life, my lover, my lady
Is the sea"
(c) Copyright 1971 & 1972 by Evie Music, Inc. and Spruce Run Music. Chappell
& Co., Inc., publisher and administrato
I wonder if Looking Glass ever had another hit song...
never thought I'd say this (ugh) thanks for posting that Roxxxanne.
blueveinedthrobber wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:So here's the general pattern - most of the conservatives post expositions of their opinions, and most of the liberals make jokes about the conservatives' character, never daring to actually take on their ideas.
that's because we don't find you worthy of a serious post..... comic fodder.... you guys serve a noble purpose :wink:
In debate, when one of the participants says, I will not respond to your argument because it's beneath me, it is equivalent to saying, "I forfeit." Your claim that you simply refuse to compete in the arena of logical argument must be taken as an indication that you cannot, despite any rationalization you may make.
do you have some sort of "Debate For Dummies" handbook next to your bed like your King James or something?
Have you ever considered getting a outside interest?
Brandon9000 wrote:blacksmithn wrote:Please. Guys like Brandon haul around in their frigging Humvees, blaming Democrats for the price of gas. That's his idea of sacrifice...
When someone posts an idea with which you disagree, and you attack him without debating his idea, it says something negative about you, but doesn't discredit his idea. The interpretation is either that you're unable to compete on the basis of calm, dignified argument, or that you've very immature.
How tragic for you. Consider it your version of "noble sacrifice," Sparky. Like that frigging magnetic Support the Troops ribbon guys like you love to sport on their SUV, it's the LEAST you can do...
:Major Combat" ended on Guam in 1944.
The last Japanese soldier didnt surrender till 1972.
It took another 6 months and 1000 US casualties after "major combat" had ended to finally pacify the island.
There is a difference between "major combat" and mopping up.
mysteryman wrote::Major Combat" ended on Guam in 1944.
The last Japanese soldier didnt surrender till 1972.
It took another 6 months and 1000 US casualties after "major combat" had ended to finally pacify the island.
There is a difference between "major combat" and mopping up.
Yeah, the US is simply "mopping up" in Iraq. Misery Mujer, another a2k gift that just keeps on giving.
Hey, is it true what I hear that the current of a2k Bush apologists are merely characters created by the a2k staff to provide straight man-dullards for the a2k witty liberals?
mysteryman wrote::Major Combat" ended on Guam in 1944.
The last Japanese soldier didnt surrender till 1972.
It took another 6 months and 1000 US casualties after "major combat" had ended to finally pacify the island.
There is a difference between "major combat" and mopping up.
There is also this major difference..
Quote:U.S. President Harry Truman officially proclaimed an end of hostilities on December 31, 1946.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_War
Truman didn't declare the end of hostilities or the end of major combat in Guam in 1944. Bush DID proclaim the end of major combat in Iraq which is precisely where the major combat is continuing.
Parados, if you insist on muddling things up with facts, how are these jokers supposed to make their "point?"
blueveinedthrobber wrote:do you have some sort of "Debate For Dummies" handbook next to your bed like your King James or something?
Have you ever considered getting a outside interest?
Since you've been on A2K, your defense of your viewpoint has consisted almost solely of irrelevant personal jibes when anyone expresses disagreement with you. The conservatives calmly post their ideas and the logic behind them; the liberals attack their character. How pathetic.
The Bush apologists calmly post their delusions while the rest of the world laughs at them.
Brandon9000 wrote:blueveinedthrobber wrote:do you have some sort of "Debate For Dummies" handbook next to your bed like your King James or something?
Have you ever considered getting a outside interest?
Since you've been on A2K, your defense of your viewpoint has consisted almost solely of irrelevant personal jibes when anyone expresses disagreement with you. The conservatives calmly post their ideas and the logic behind them; the liberals attack their character. How pathetic.
Boo-friggin'-hoo! Your ideas are as morally bankrupt as the administration you support. No reasoned debate that I've ever seen will serve to divert you and your toadying comrades from blind support of party line over country. Of COURSE we make fun of you! You're pitiful, repetitious buffoons. And I mean that in the kindest way possible.
"I've got to mop up some hurl, pick up regurgitation
And the need for sanitation here is high
There's some slop on the floor, over there I see some more
And my job is to mop up the hurl"..... Silly Willy
Media Matters has done the dirty work of digging up how the stenographer media "reported" on George W. Bush's mission-accomplished day on May 1, 2003. No questions about whether or not it seemed too clean and oversimplified to just suddenly declare the hostilities over and certainly no real reporting on why so many military experts were in disagreement at the time.
Some interesting excerpts follow (nauseating, but interesting):
MSNBC's Chris Matthews: "And that's the president looking very much like a jet, you know, a high-flying jet star. A guy who is a jet pilot. Has been in the past when he was younger, obviously. What does that image mean to the American people, a guy who can actually get into a supersonic plane and actually fly in an unpressurized cabin like an actual jet pilot?"
"
the president deserves everything he's doing tonight in terms of his leadership. He won the war. He was an effective commander. Everybody recognizes that, I believe, except a few critics."
"We're proud of our president. Americans love having a guy as president, a guy who has a little swagger, who's physical, who's not a complicated guy like [former President Bill] Clinton or even like [former Democratic presidential candidates Michael] Dukakis or [Walter] Mondale, all those guys, [George] McGovern. They want a guy who's president. Women like a guy who's president. Check it out. The women like this war. I think we like having a hero as our president."
Take a break to go vomit now and then read a few more
CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "A little bit of history and a lot of drama today when President Bush became the first commander in chief to make a tailhook landing on an aircraft carrier. A one-time Fighter Dog himself in the Air National Guard, the president flew in the co-pilot seat with a trip to the USS Abraham Lincoln. And he then mingled with the pilots and the crew members of the carrier on its way back from a deployment which covered the war in Iraq and before that, the war in Afghanistan. From that same deck tonight, the president will make more history. He'll deliver a major address to the nation."
"And as we mentioned, President Bush is no stranger to military aircraft. He flew F-102 fighter jets in the Texas Air National Guard. He joined at the height of the Vietnam War but was never sent overseas and never saw combat. There's a picture of the young George W. Bush in the Texas Air National Guard."
Was this before or after he went AWOL, Wolf?
CNBC's Brian Williams, now anchor of NBC's Nightly News: "And two immutable truths about the president that the Democrats can't change: He's a youthful guy. He looked terrific and full of energy in a flight suit. He is a former pilot, so it's not a foreign art form to him. Not all presidents could have pulled this scene off today."
