1
   

Limbaugh arrested

 
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:03 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Don't forget, Bush also promised to bring democracy to the Middle East; we're all waiting.



It takes time. Look a little more closely and you will see the beginnings are forming.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:03 pm
Are people living in Rutland, Vermont, real Americans with a brain?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:04 pm
The beginnings are forming for a civil war - if that's not already a foregone conclusion.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:08 pm
Sturgis wrote:
parados wrote:
Clinton swore he would give us health care.
Bush swore he would get Osama Dead or Alive.

Gee. anyone can look like a failure if you pick the right stuff.

The difference.
Clinton gave us peace, prosperity and a budget surplus.
Bush has given us an ongoing war that has nothing to do with 9/11, deficits forever, high gas prices, an economy that is based solely on deficit spending. But hey, tax cuts for everyone.


The current difficulties are due to Clinton.


Sure, of course. Yeah.. CLinton made the GOP do it. Clinton is so wonderful he can make Bush do things. Why did we not just change our constitution and let Clinton remain in office since he is still doing everything today.

Clinton did NOT make Bush invade Iraq. Clinton did not make Bush fail to institute an energy policy. Clinton did NOT cause the current deficits.

Blaming Clinton for the "current difficulties" shows a complete disconnect with reality.
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:13 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Are people living in Rutland, Vermont, real Americans with a brain?


If you want to play tit for tat...

Apparently living in silicon valley you either have a silicon implant for a brain or else you have digested one too many microchips.


Real American? Define what you believe to be a real American. I suppose it would be someone without free will, without the ability to make their own choice or maybe the REAL American as you see it is anybody who agrees wholeheartedly with you. The second they voice an opinion different from yours, you decide they are
A)not an American
B)without a brain.
C)an entire town sharing one brain ("real Americans with a brain")

Seems to me that the arrogance and ignorance you placed in that one post makes it possible that you are the one lacking a brain (or at least a properly functioning one)
0 Replies
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:17 pm
parados wrote:
Clinton did NOT cause the current deficits.

Blaming Clinton for the "current difficulties" shows a complete disconnect with reality.



In a manner of speaking he did. Clinton failing to take down Bin Laden when he could brought about the final tragedy of September 11, 2001 which in turn brought on the financial woes which President Bush is now forced to work on. Talk about disconnect with reality... have you looked in a mirror lately?
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:20 pm
Clinton Clinton.... didn't he used to be president? Operative word used?
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:22 pm
parados wrote:
Clinton swore he would give us health care.
Bush swore he would get Osama Dead or Alive.

Gee. anyone can look like a failure if you pick the right stuff.

The difference.
Clinton gave us peace, prosperity and a budget surplus.
Bush has given us an ongoing war that has nothing to do with 9/11, deficits forever, high gas prices, an economy that is based solely on deficit spending. But hey, tax cuts for everyone.


Good post, parados.

However, the tax cuts have not benefited the majority of Americans. The only ones who have truly benefited are the wealthiest of the wealthy. Considering the rate of inflation and sky-rocketing costs of energy, most of us are far worse off financially since the republicans gained control of our government. But hey, 11 states amended their state constitutions to prohibit gay marriage and South Dakota outlawed abortions. Pretty soon, the morally superior citizens will have us bra-burning feminists of yore back in the kitchen where we belong . . . barefoot and pregnant.

And America can celebrate PROGRESS! Bush, baseball, and apple pie!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:26 pm
More middle class families are falling into the lower class, and more families are going without health insurance. More families have bigger debt and less savings.

Bush's drug plan doesn't address any of these failings that continues to grow worse.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:29 pm
Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare, Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt.

Why do you try to attribute these things to Bush?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:33 pm
Because when Clinton was president, the reverse was true.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:34 pm
Because he is, in fact, the de facto leader of the party which is, in fact, doing all of those things you list, McG.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Debra Law
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:41 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare, Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt.

Why do you try to attribute these things to Bush?


So true, McGentrix. ALL AMERICANS have the opportunity to choose from any number of available, high paying jobs with great benefits (including health insurance). If an American doesn't have a high paying job and health care benefits, that's not an indication of a "bad economy." NO! That's an indication of a lazy American who isn't taking advantage of the land of opportunity. As far as those low paying jobs that do not provide healthcare--Americans don't want those jobs--and that's why our beloved president has proposed the "guest worker" program so those unAmerican MEXICANS can do our low class work.

McGentrix. I'm so glad you posted and showed all of us how Bush is not to blame for anything.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 01:49 pm
Debra_Law wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare, Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt.

Why do you try to attribute these things to Bush?


So true, McGentrix. ALL AMERICANS have the opportunity to choose from any number of available, high paying jobs with great benefits (including health insurance). If an American doesn't have a high paying job and health care benefits, that's not an indication of a "bad economy." NO! That's an indication of a lazy American who isn't taking advantage of the land of opportunity. As far as those low paying jobs that do not provide healthcare--Americans don't want those jobs--and that's why our beloved president has proposed the "guest worker" program so those unAmerican MEXICANS can do our low class work.

McGentrix. I'm so glad you posted and showed all of us how Bush is not to blame for anything.


Your welcome. That's not what I said, but don't let that bother you, it has never seemed to bother you before and I am sure you will never let actual words bother you in the future.

WHy take an inch when you can take a yard, right Deb?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 02:01 pm
McG did say:
Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare, Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt.

Point 1: "Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, ..."
Nobody is making people spend more money than they have; if they had it to spend. The problem lies in many variables including a) salaries not keeping up with inflation, b) people paying more for health insurance, and c) family debt at an all time high.

Point 2: "Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare,..."
You have not been keeping up with the realities of world economic competition. More companies in the US are cutting benefits for our workers or going out of business, because we do not have universal health care like most developed countries. Ever hear of the airlines and auto industries in the US going bankrupt? Probably not.

Point 3: "Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt..."
No, but Bush has also taken away or increased the cost for college loans, underfunded our schools while mandating No Child Left Behind standards, and increased the national debt to unsustainable levels to exacerbate inflation. People must feed, educate, and clothes their family, while tax breaks are given to the very wealthy.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 02:11 pm
nimh wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Some of this info is wrong.
Limbaugh has only written 2 books,"The way things ought to be" and "See I told you so".

Talking about info that is wrong, Mysteryman, did you ever see or acknowledge this post? Considering the hissyfit you threw earlier about other people saying Limbaugh had been "arrested", it might be good form to note it..


According to amazon.com,Limbaugh only wrote 2 books...
http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4033762-2384730?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Rush+Limbaugh&Go.x=12&Go.y=11

According to abebooks,Limbaugh only wrote 2 books...
http://dogbert.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&an=Rush+Limbaugh&y=12&x=58

According to alibris.com,Limbaugh wtote only 2 books...
http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm

According to Barnes and Noble LImbaugh wrote only 2 books...
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/used/TitleResults.asp?CNT=Rush+Limbaugh&z=y

According to His own bio he wrote only 2 books.
How am I wrong about what I said about how many books he wrote.
As for him possibly being gay,who cares?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 02:15 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
McG did say:
Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare, Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt.

Point 1: "Bush isn't making people spend more money then they have, ..."
Nobody is making people spend more money than they have; if they had it to spend. The problem lies in many variables including a) salaries not keeping up with inflation, b) people paying more for health insurance, and c) family debt at an all time high.


None of which Involves Bush.

Quote:
Point 2: "Bush is not making people take jobs that do not provide healthcare,..."
You have not been keeping up with the realities of world economic competition. More companies in the US are cutting benefits for our workers or going out of business, because we do not have universal health care like most developed countries. Ever hear of the airlines and auto industries in the US going bankrupt? Probably not.


Sure I have heard about them C.I., What does Bush have to do with any of it though? Is he responsible for outrageous CEO salaries? Is he responsible for every company trying to stay competitive? Last time I checked, the US was a capitalist country where successful business thrived and unsuccessful businesses failed. Hardly the fault of the President.

Quote:
Point 3: "Bush is not responsible for the decisions that people make that place them in debt..."
No, but Bush has also taken away or increased the cost for college loans, underfunded our schools while mandating No Child Left Behind standards, and increased the national debt to unsustainable levels to exacerbate inflation. People must feed, educate, and clothes their family, while tax breaks are given to the very wealthy.


Colleges increase the tuition, not the President. Bush has increased funding for public education tremendously. For you to say otherwise is just a lie and you know it.

Bush has not used his veto power on spending certainly, but look no further then your own representative if you want to find out the reason for huge deficits.

Wealthy people already carry the lions share of the tax burden in the US. It's time for people to look to their own finances and quit envying their neighbors.

So to reiterate, Bush does force people to spend more then they make, Bush does not create or take away jobs and Bush is not reponsible for people's healthcare insurance.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 02:19 pm
Debra_Law wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
I am only bringing him up because if you truly believe that Clinton did nothing wrong,for the reasons listed,then you must also believe Rush did nothing wrong.


Are you playing the "every conservative politician and talk-show host is entitled to get-out-of-jail for all their criminal conduct because of Clinton" card again? Your post is a silly, ineffectual attempt to deflect and derail attention away from Limbaugh.


No,thats not what I'm saying,but that has never stopped you in the past.
I said that you MUST apply the same standards to Rush that you applied to Clinton.


Quote:
Therefore . . . free blowjobs and lies for everyone!


Are you volunteering to give them?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 02:21 pm
Quote:
I said that you MUST apply the same standards to Rush that you applied to Clinton.


Why? There is a major difference in the case, namely, Clinton didn't break any state or federal laws by committing his act, whereas Rush broke several state and federal laws by committing his.

Apples and Oranges bro. Nice try to turn the conversation to Clinton again, though.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2006 02:22 pm
mysteryman wrote:
nimh wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Some of this info is wrong.
Limbaugh has only written 2 books,"The way things ought to be" and "See I told you so".

Talking about info that is wrong, Mysteryman, did you ever see or acknowledge this post? Considering the hissyfit you threw earlier about other people saying Limbaugh had been "arrested", it might be good form to note it..


According to amazon.com,Limbaugh only wrote 2 books...
http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/ref=nb_ss_b/104-4033762-2384730?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=Rush+Limbaugh&Go.x=12&Go.y=11

According to abebooks,Limbaugh only wrote 2 books...
http://dogbert.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&an=Rush+Limbaugh&y=12&x=58

According to alibris.com,Limbaugh wtote only 2 books...
http://www.alibris.com/search/search.cfm

According to Barnes and Noble LImbaugh wrote only 2 books...
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/used/TitleResults.asp?CNT=Rush+Limbaugh&z=y

According to His own bio he wrote only 2 books.
How am I wrong about what I said about how many books he wrote.
As for him possibly being gay,who cares?


MM, nimh has the words "this post" hotlinked -- it takes you here:

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2009833#2009833

It is a post from snood responding to your question about where it says that Limbaugh has been "arrested;" snood provided several examples.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Limbaugh arrested
  3. » Page 5
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/27/2024 at 06:23:43