0
   

Therapy For Relationships Is A Scam

 
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 05:42 pm
"it is only too typical that the "content" of any medium blinds us to the character of the medium." (McLuhan 9)

Also perhaps you could answer my two questions in Post: 3010490.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 05:44 pm
Well, you can give it a try with us, Chumley. There is always a sympethetic ear here at a2k - calamities included. Laughing
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 05:46 pm
!
Right kind of you!
0 Replies
 
Mame
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 06:28 pm
Re: Therapy For Relationships Is A Scam
Chumly wrote:
Mame wrote:
Wouldn't that depend on the reason for the counselling/therapy?
Wouldn't what depend? Also what makes you presume the "reason" is known, beforehand or otherwise?

Let's say you think you have irreconcilable differences or you've grown too far apart and don't want to stay in the relationship but you want to run your thoughts by someone... you therefore know the reason you're there!


Have look here as per the phrase "the medium is the message" and how it would apply in this case. "it is only too typical that the "content" of any medium blinds us to the character of the medium." http://individual.utoronto.ca/markfederman/article_mediumisthemessage.htm[/quote]

"The content of the medium (which I take to be the therapy) blinds us to the character of the medium" (which I take to be the professional) has NOTHING to do with the professional "impressing upon their clients that they have been of consequential benefit".

I read the first sentence to mean the character of the professional is irrelevant to the actual therapy. Am I missing something here?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Dec, 2007 06:40 pm
No the character of the medium is not the professional. However the character of the medium may include the presumption / expectation of efficacy as I've discussed.

How is Vancouver Island treating you (I was born in Comox)?
0 Replies
 
SULLYFISH66
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 12:34 pm
Why would you even compare couple's therapy to a sexy holiday, talking to friends, a dog, working it, going to the gym, improving your diet, learning about Tantric sex, taking up ballroom dancing, stopping present relationship and finding a better one, etc. etc.?

All of these behaviors have nothing to do with counseling. They are quick fixes for boredom, or just plain something different to do.
0 Replies
 
martybarker
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 12:43 pm
From my personal experience, my counselor recommended a therapist for my ex and I to see together because he strongly believed in keeping couples together whi had kids. At the 3rd meeting he looked at me and said"He doesn't love you, you need to move on"

While I was in the midst of turmoil, I just needed an answer to why. It just seemed like this guy threw up his hands and said it was over. There really wasn't anything that he offered us in a way of trying to salvage the marriage.
0 Replies
 
SULLYFISH66
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 01:14 pm
You said - There really wasn't anything that he offered us in a way of trying to salvage the marriage.

Maybe the therapist could see that there was nothing to salvage. It would have taken two willing participants. Your ex did not want to do the work. The therapist cut to the chase and told you that.

PS - "Why?" is a very dangerous question, IMHO. Does it really matter?
As if you could "fix" it???
0 Replies
 
martybarker
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 01:35 pm
So my answer to the threads questions is yes.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 03:52 pm
Thanks for all the interesting responses all!

I was kind'a hoping there might be response to my post: 3010360. Alas no one has responded to it at all.

It's not that I find individual subjective impressions unworthy of discussion, it's just not the main point. Here's post: 3010360.
Quote:
April 27, 2005
New Study Shows Marriage Counseling Doesn't Work Well

I already knew that marriage counseling has a poor track record. A 1997 paper by Sullivan and Bradbury entitled "Are premarital prevention programs reaching couples at risk for marital dysfunction?" in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology had shown that "[w]hile couples who experienced premarital counseling claim to be more satisfied in their marriages than couples who did not, in the end there is no difference in marital outcomes between those couples who have had extensive premarital counseling and those who have not."

A new study has shown that marriage counseling doesn't work. It found that "[t]wo years after ending counseling, studies find, 25 percent of couples are worse off than they were when they started, and after four years, up to 38 percent are divorced."

Many of the counseling strategies used today, like teaching people to listen and communicate better and to behave in more positive ways, can help couples for up to a year, say social scientists who have analyzed the effectiveness of different treatments. But they are insufficient to get couples through the squalls of conflict that inevitably recur in the long term.

At the same time, experts say, many therapists lack the skills to work with couples who are in serious trouble. Unable to help angry couples get to the root of their conflict and forge a resolution, these therapists do one of two things: They either let the partners take turns talking week after week, with no end to the therapy in sight, or they give up on the couple and, in effect, steer them to divorce.

"Couples therapy can do more harm than good when the therapist doesn't know how to help a couple," said Dr. Susan M. Johnson, professor of psychology at the University of Ottawa and director of the Ottawa Couple and Family Institute.

The article quote Dr. John Gottman, whom I'm already familiar with. He's a relationship expert who I feel is better at his job than that shyster John "Mars/Venus" Gray. The article also cited an unnamed recent study that had shown "that it is not whether a couple fights but how they fight that can destroy a relationship."

Posted on April 27, 2005 at 12:42 PM | Permalink

Comments
Trish,

As a Child and Family Therapist, I can attest to three things regarding marital counseling: 1. If one spouse wants to be there and the other one doesn't - forget about it.
2. If one spouse makes changes and the other one doesn't - forget about it.
3. If both want to be there and both make changes, the chance of success skyrockets.

I didn't see these variables addressed in the report.

Posted by: Screwy Hoolie at Apr 28, 2005 4:46:40 PM

I have some friends whose marriage counseling made them realize that they HAD to get divorced. The question was, should we do it now when we can still be friendly and civil, or do we wait until later (i.e. when the kids are grown) and we all suffer terribly?

They chose the former. The aftermath has not been smooth for reasons I won't go into here, but the split was the fault of both parties equally and I heard the same story from both of them.

Posted by: kohoutekdriver8 at Apr 28, 2005 10:39:07 PM

Hoolie is wise in ways like this. Oy. From one who knows.

Posted by: The Heretik at Apr 28, 2005 11:46:28 PM

I don't doubt that more marital therapy attempts fail than succeed, but there are factors to consider. First, what is failure? As a psychotherapist who does quite a bit of marital work, I find that the goal is not always for the couple to remain a marital unit.

Also, of the instances of marital therapy recorded in the study, how many were actual therapeutic experiences, and how many involved the couple showing up a few times and then dropping out?

I have had some good experiences helping couples stay together by showing them new ways to deal with each other. I have also turned many couples away and told each party to enter individual therapy instead. Is that a statistical failure?

Relatively healthy people do well in couple therapy. Relatively unhealthy people do not.

Posted by: Diane at Apr 29, 2005 1:16:28 PM

I wasted time for 2 years in marital therapy. All it did was give the ex more time to find ways to run up debt in my name or dump on me after the divorce. The therapist never called him on his efforts to control the therapy process, or his refusal to do one damn thing or make even one small symbolic concession or compromise. I think she was basically intimidated by him, as much as any of his former wives or girlfriends. You'd think a therapist would see the abuse dynamic and how it was being reenacted with her, but she was apparently oblivious.

Interesting it that the one time we saw a man, a minister as it was, he called the ex on his order issuing right away. Ex didn't like it. Women therapists cannot let themselves be bullied by these types.

Posted by: silverside at Apr 29, 2005 3:13:46 PM

One intervention that I know has helped a lot of marriages is attending a Retrouvaille weekend along with the follow-up gatherings. This is a peer ministry of people who themselves have managed to create positive marriages after significant problems--affairs, alcoholism, sex addictions, etc.

Posted by: Emily at May 10, 2005 2:05:42 PM

Unfortunately, most marriage counseling are not
interested in marriage counseling. They attempt
to provide treatmeant which is outside of their
scope of practice.
Few marriage counselors conduct research or write
articles on marriage counselors. Even the study
being referenced here was conducted by psychologist.
Professional Jounals rearly contain articles by
marriage counselors. Most marriage counseling is
provided by clinical social workers or psychologists.


Posted by: George Anderson at Jul 11, 2005 11:30:13 PM

"I wasted time for 2 years in marital therapy. All it did was give the ex more time to find ways to run up debt in my name...

Interesting it that the one time we saw a man, a minister as it was, he called the ex on his order issuing right away. Ex didn't like it. Women therapists cannot let themselves be bullied by these types."

This is interesting Silverside. As your ex appeared to combined the worse traits of both men and women in one uber personality package. The natural aggression displayed by most males by ordering you around and the female passive/aggressive behavior in spending down someone else's resources; while contributing NOTHING significant of their own...as I find the WORSE offenders in this area are frequently women who neither work OR add children to the family...

I mean the bottom line is that people have to understand if you are not contributing anything of significance to the relationship (either money or children) you'd got to accept the lesser role in the family...and I find men are never willing to do that...

Thus these househusband/stay-at-home dad situations rarely succeed for any length of time...as men fail to accept the lesser role. They want to STILL be the 'head of household' and telling everyone else what to do, giving orders, etc., even though they are contribiting significantly less to the household...

Posted by: NYMOM at Sep 24, 2005 5:52:37 AM

Retrouvaille is just another sham of the Christian right! I was drug to a retreat which would "save my marriage" told that God hated divorce and was badgered for the last months of my marriage and even our separation by people who knew what was best for me. I talked to two other men at the retreat who felt the way I felt. Just ending the thing made ending the marriage and going through the divorce a hell of a lot more difficult. But then, that is their agenda.

Posted by: tw05439 at Feb 6, 2006 10:15:41 AM

Worked for me and Becky. But perhaps we would have worked things out without it.

Posted by: Chris Clarke at Feb 6, 2006 10:33:17 PM


http://trishwilson.typepad.com/blog/2005/04/new_study_shows.html
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 04:50 pm
Most couples seek out a marriage counselor in a last ditch effort, meaning
that oftentimes they're beyond reconciliation, they just need someone, a neutral party to open their eyes and pinpoint to them what's written on the wall already.

Ideally, couples seek a therapist at the beginning of their marriage in
order to learn how to treat each other, recognize bad behavioral patterns and find ways to weather difficult situations.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 05:07 pm
Your view that most couples seek help as a last ditch effort and will split up regardless of said help does not address:

a) You say
CalamityJane wrote:
Ideally, couples seek a therapist at the beginning of their marriage in order to learn how to treat each other, recognize bad behavioral patterns and find ways to weather difficult situations.
This 1997 paper by Sullivan and Bradbury entitled premarital prevention programs in the end there is no difference in marital outcomes between those couples who have had extensive premarital counseling and those who have not.

b) Many therapists lack the skills to work with couples who are in serious trouble. Unable to help angry couples get to the root of their conflict and forge a resolution, these therapists do one of two things: They either let the partners take turns talking week after week, with no end to the therapy in sight, or they give up on the couple and, in effect, steer them to divorce.

c) Couples therapy can do more harm than good when the therapist doesn't know how to help a couple," said Dr. Susan M. Johnson, professor of psychology at the University of Ottawa and director of the Ottawa Couple and Family Institute.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 05:11 pm
I have never been in therapy, so I cannot tell you if any of them
are good or not. I do believe that some therapists lack the necessary
skills to help a couple in need. Like in any other field, there are
good professionals and there are bad ones.

Chumly, can you, from experience, attest that the claims in a), b) and c)
are correct or incorrect?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 06:04 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
I have never been in therapy, so I cannot tell you if any of them
are good or not. I do believe that some therapists lack the necessary
skills to help a couple in need. Like in any other field, there are
good professionals and there are bad ones.

Chumly, can you, from experience, attest that the claims in a), b) and c)
are correct or incorrect?
My experiences would be unscientific, subjective and lacking empiricism alas, thus any subjective personal experience could not be used to attest to the correctness or incorrectness.

You infer there may be good therapists. Without a scientific, subjective empirically based yardstick, exactly how would you know this? Even if true that there are good therapists, without a scientific, subjective empirically based yardstick, exactly would one know a good therapist from a bad therapist?

The whole problem centers around the lack of empirically derived studies showing therapy efficacy, when compared to the few scientific, subjective empirically derived studies debunking therapy efficacy as I've cited earlier.

Consider the billions of dollars spent on therapy. You'd think that it would be in the therapy industry's best interests to supply subjective empirically derived studies supporting their claims. The lack of such studies makes me skeptical.

For example: all societies have their shaman, their witch doctors, their priests. Billions of people believe prayer works. Trillions of dollars are spent in the name of religion and prayer. This in no way makes religion and prayer subject to plausibility.


Despite my caveats I answer:

a) I've never been to a premarital prevention program.

b) I would not know how to assess a therapist's skills without a scientific, subjective empirically based yardstick.

c) I have no direct personal experience with therapist's doing more harm than good. I have no direct personal experience with therapist's doing more good than harm. I've been to one therapist once with my present wife some 8 years ago. He said things I could have just as easily also said and in fact have as the occasion permits.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 06:27 pm
CalamityJane,

The teaching and practice of therapy philosophies and methodologies cannot in and of itself be used to demonstrate therapy's efficacy!

Why?

Because of two logical fallacies:

1) "Appeal to authority" consists on basing the truth value of an assertion on the authority, knowledge or position of the person asserting it.

2) "Argumentum ad populum" consists on basing the truth value of an assertion due to many or all people believing it.
0 Replies
 
SULLYFISH66
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:04 pm
Chumly,

You overintellectualize what is simply a human connection - it either works or it doesn't.

People nowadays GET OUT of (bad) marriages much more quickly and easily than in past generations.

You really should post your queston on the philosophy board. You have taken out the human factor in all your arguments.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:31 pm
Chumly wrote:
You infer there may be good therapists. Without a scientific, subjective empirically based yardstick, exactly how would you know this? Even if true that there are good therapists, without a scientific, subjective empirically based yardstick, exactly would one know a good therapist from a bad therapist?


The same way you'd choose a physician. You don't need to be a premed
student or have the physicians CV in front of you to determine if the
physician of your choice is good or bad. If he cannot pinpoint what's wrong
with you and you've gone there a number of times and still have the
same ailments as before, you know he's not helping you.

I'd say the same principle can be applied for a therapist. Foremost,
there needs to be a connection between you and the therapist, something
what the Latinos call "sympatico". If you don't care for the therapist,
don't go there. After you've found one that you feel comfortable with,
you see what strategy they use, how they approach your problem and
what solutions they suggest for you. If it makes sense to you, then
it works.

I don't know if you're familiar with Albert Ellis. He was a no frills
Psychologist whose Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) made
a lot of sense. He believed that through rational therapy, people can
understand their errors better. He once said, if you're going for more than 6 session to a therapist and he hasn't helped you, he/she never will.

Bottom line, Chumley: look for someone you feel comfortable with
and is willing to look beyond the ordinary. What good does all the
scientific evidence do, if you personally are not helped, eh?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 07:34 pm
SULLYFISH66 wrote:
Chumly,

You overintellectualize what is simply a human connection - it either works or it doesn't.
False, you can make same claim about the diving rod. I simply present what should be plain to those of rational mind.
SULLYFISH66 wrote:
People nowadays GET OUT of (bad) marriages much more quickly and easily than in past generations.
Wholly irrelevant to the question of the efficacy of couples therapy; your claim is akin to the logical fallacy called the non sequitur.
SULLYFISH66 wrote:
You really should post your queston on the philosophy board.
I will post where I see fit, you're welcome to do the same.
SULLYFISH66 wrote:
You have taken out the human factor in all your arguments.
Meaningless drivel; wholly irrelevant to the question of the efficacy of couples therapy, thus akin to the logical fallacy called the non sequitur.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Dec, 2007 08:06 pm
I'm not your compleat fan of therapy or therapists, though I'm acquainted with several as friends. And yet, I've anecdotally seen progress for friends who've gone there and done that. In fact, I think of myself as a therapy offshoot, benefitting from other folks' group sessions, some years ago. Part of my growing up, all that listening. And on many levels, I see therapists as providers of handrails for many, many, and in some cases, life ropes.





I think Chumly started this thread with a cause and a certain adamantineness.

I'll just say, ok, that's your view, chumly. Take it and be well.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

A good cry on the train - Discussion by Joe Nation
I want to run away. I can't do this anymore. Help? - Question by unknownpersonuser
Please help, should I call CPS?? - Question by butterflyring
I Don't Know What To Do or Think Anymore - Question by RunningInPlace
Flirting? I Say Yes... - Question by LST1969
My wife constantly makes the same point. - Question by alwayscloudy
Cellphone number - Question by Smiley12
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/23/2025 at 10:15:25