dagmaraka wrote:i am by far the youngest, and the only non-historian, so that's where i'll put my niche. in poli sci and ethnology - i'll present my model and ask them what they, as historians, think of it. [..] i feel so inadequate here. [..] here am i, the youngest, the only one who hasn't even lived back then... .
OK, you'll be fine... <smiles>. I mean, you're 'outside the box' in so many ways already anyway ... you are in a different niche, from a different place, from all of them collectively ... so that actually gives you lots of leeway. Cause
they all know you're by far the youngest, who didnt live through all that,
and the only non-historian to boot, as well ... so they'll probably be well ready to suspend their usual expectations/norms anyway ... you know, like they're looking at the extended family's talented, but alternative benjamin ... he dont need to worry about going out on a limb sometimes.
And even if the worst comes to worst, I'm sure they'll be quite happy to, you know, see it as more proof that politicial scientists cant hold a candle to them historians, they'll actually be quite pleased to do that ;-). And as last resort you can just bore them with lots of rigid methodological stuff that historians usually dont have to bother with, that'll put you right hors concours, they wont even go near digging into any of that