JTT
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:23 pm
@H2O MAN,
You, and the other wingnuts, might be taken seriously if y'all weren't such major hypocrites, h2oman.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:24 pm
@JTT,
nope...
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:28 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

You, and the other wingnuts, might be taken seriously if y'all weren't such a major hypocrites, h2oman.


You, and other inbred, red neck, limp dick liberals are seriously lacking common
sense and the ability to live another day without government support.

You are pathetic, JTT.
JTT
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:29 pm
@Rockhead,
Smile

By the by, I've noticed that I've been able to edit even after a new post was added. I had thought that that nixed that chance.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:29 pm
@JTT,
Nope...
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:29 pm
@JTT,
it's all timers now...
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:30 pm


Time is running out...
JTT
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:35 pm
@H2O MAN,
You, and the other wingnuts, might be taken seriously if y'all weren't such a major hypocrites, h2oman and if you hadn't such a propensity to prevaricate or lie outright as y'all see the situation demands.
Debra Law
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:35 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:
Bush invented the term, "compassionate conservatism," and ran on this concept, . . . .


I don't believe that Bush invented the phrase. Could you please do some fact checking with regard to your assertion and verify for us whether it is accurate.
JTT
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:38 pm
@Debra Law,
Might this be the "prevarication" part?
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:45 pm
@JTT,


You are truly pathetic, JTT.

You, and other inbred, red neck, limp dick liberal liars are seriously lacking
common sense and the ability to live another day without government support.

You deserve all that the future holds for you.

JTT
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:50 pm
@H2O MAN,
Have I mentioned the importance of making sense, at least on the odd occasion, h20man?
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 12:52 pm
@JTT,


JTT, your "SPAM" has been noted.
0 Replies
 
Gargamel
 
  2  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:03 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:
All that liberal democrats can do in response to facts, logic and common
sense is launch more personal attacks against those they disagree with.


http://able2know.org/topic/134292-1#post-3704539
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:08 pm
@Gargamel,
Gargoyle, is that your new signature?
It looks good on you Cool
Debra Law
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:19 pm
@okie,
okie wrote:

And here is the type of people Obama chooses as his advisors. Is there any question now that Obama is a radical?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-science-advisor-called-for-planetary-regime-to-enforce-totalitarian-population-control-measures.html

"Obama Science Advisor Called For “Planetary Regime” To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures

In 1977 book, John Holdren advocated forced abortions, mass sterilization through food and water supply and mandatory bodily implants to prevent pregnancies

President Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children."




Again, you should conduct a reasonable amount of fact checking before you accept wild accusations like the one you posted above.

Start here:

http://scienceblogs.com/bioephemera/2009/07/description_misrepresented_as.php

Holdren did NOT "advocate forced abortions, mass sterilization through food and water supply and mandatory bodily implants to prevent pregnancies."

So long as Roe v. Wade remains the law of the land, forced abortions and forced sterilizations would be unconstitutional as a violation of an individual's fundamental right to determine her own procreative destiny.

Those who advocate for the overruling of Roe v. Wade in order to place the power over procreation in the hands of government ought to be careful what they wish for because the pendulum swings both ways.
JTT
 
  0  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:20 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Gargoyle, is that your new signature?
It looks good on you


A dandy example of your tendencies towards prevarication, which then often leads you to lies. Is there no chance then, that you would want to show some improvement, however tiny, h2oman?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 01:27 pm
@Debra Law,
okie's tendencies towards fiction about Obama and our country is more humor than reality. His over-riding thesis is always about fear-mongering and nothing else based on reality or common sense. That's the reason he gets trapped in his own beliefs and rhetoric.

The only radical around here is okie.

Definition of rad·i·cal (rd-kl)
adj.
1. Arising from or going to a root or source; basic: proposed a radical solution to the problem.
2. Departing markedly from the usual or customary; extreme: radical opinions on education.
3. Favoring or effecting fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions: radical political views.
4. Linguistics Of or being a root: a radical form.

n.
1. One who advocates fundamental or revolutionary changes in current practices, conditions, or institutions: radicals seeking to overthrow the social order.
mysteryman
 
  2  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 04:33 pm
I'm wondering how long it will be before the liberals start calling Obama a "chickenhawk".

After all, they attacked Bush because he didnt fight in Vietnam, so how could he be qualified to be the CinC.

They overlook that at least he did fly in the Texas NG.

Now, since Obama has NEVER worn the uniform, and since he is INCREASING troops in Afghanistan, why isnt the same criticism applied to him?
He is sending American soldiers to a foreign country, where they could get killed, but he has never served or worn the uniform.

So, why isnt he a "chickenhawk" also?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Thu 16 Jul, 2009 04:43 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Obama fits. He is a radical. Do not listen to what he says, but what he does, and who he admires and hangs around with.
 

Related Topics

So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
My view on Obama - Discussion by McGentrix
Obama/ Love Him or Hate Him, We've Got Him - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Obama fumbles at Faith Forum - Discussion by slkshock7
Expert: Obama is not the antichrist - Discussion by joefromchicago
Obama's State of the Union - Discussion by maxdancona
Obama 2012? - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Obama '08?
  3. » Page 1334
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 03/06/2025 at 01:15:13