Agreed about Colin Powell, who I think has a lot of parallels.
nimh, I know, my thinking is not so far from that, hence the copious qualifiers. ("may not be as crippling" to start out with, and LOTs of "mights", including in the part you quoted. Not "will", "might".)
I don't think people really "fell for that" with Kerry, either. I think there were some things basically off with him; people already didn't trust him and the Swiftboat stuff gave them an excuse for their inchoate distrust rather than actually changing their minds.
One thing that Dowd said I very much agree with (which is unusual):
Quote:[The Democrats] should find someone captivating with an intensely American success story -- someone like Senator Obama, Tom Brokaw or some innovative business mogul who's less crazy than Ross Perot -- and shape the campaign around that leader.
I've said variations of that before. I think a lot is lost when you have a compromise candidate, a focus-group candidate. I think someone like McCain shows that people are willing to overlook ideological divergence (to some extent, at least) if they basically trust the
person.
Obama seems promising in those terms.
I understand what you mean about the inherent distrust factor of "black + drugs", though. It's what I've said many times (and say it again here, if in the context of my being less negative about it now than I have been). If that were the case, a smear would be effective because it would give people that excuse, that "see, I knew I didn't trust him" thing.
So far it's been mostly liberals + moderates who have responded, interested in getting more input from that group but would also love to know what Republicans/ Independents think about him.