failures art wrote:
I think your post reveals something about how your brain is programmed here.
failures art wrote:
Not once do you mention the patterns of homosexual women.
I didn’t have too. I knew someone would. That’s par for the course and an essential rationalization homosexuals always use to rationalize their behavior. If one can so can the other; it’s a trite argument that goes nowhere but in circles. It can be understood by most that lesbianism is a consequence of woman responding to the assumed autonomy of man. If woman cannot receive the appropriate love from a man, she will naturally adhere to that which is the most familiar to her; another woman who knows how she should be treated. Hell, it’s just logical.
failures art wrote:
This de facto shortest route to buttsex mentality demonstrates a shallow understanding of human relationships.
I like be shallow in this instance. I’ll let you enjoy the ‘deep probing’ yourself. There are many young people who visit these forums and my hopes are to dissuade them from going to extremes of self gratification. You say “human relationships”. North is right if such behavior does catch on, you can forget any human relationships.
failures art wrote:
I believe you are drawing artificial separations between the nature of heterosexual and homosexual relationships.
No, I’m trying to understand and define the one; between man and woman. That’s the universal one. All others are structures that have been created because it is not fully understood what that man woman relationship should be.
homosexuality is a fact of life
is it a bad thing , well Humanity won't survive in pure gay society now will it ?
Damn, I hate the use of that word that was robbed to identify that “society”. Gay, my ass! Whoops!! No pun intended. I agree North but those who participate in that lifestyle will always come up with erroneous analogies to circumvent any recognition of that very fact. Like this one's Rex offered below.
And how do you know humanity would survive in a purely heterosexual community either? You make assumptions but have no ideal of the complexity and necessity that sexual diversity plays in a healthy society.
Sexual diversity necessary in a healthy society?????? To what end? Like I said it’s all about self gratification. AIDS is a healthy society? Sexual diversification means screwing anything. No thanks, I choose not to live in such a healthy society.
Would you rather live in a black and white world with no diversity of color?
Homosexuality and color? Please explain.
Would the world survive in such absolute duality? Well I propose that without diversity of sexuality humanity would have no more chance of surviving then if it had no re productivity.
Are you saying that sexual diversity is more important than reproduction? Surely not! Yes, the male female paradigm is not understood in all it’s entirety, and because of that we are free to screw anything that stands still long enough. That is sexual diversity, isn’t it!?
Hell then no one is safe; time for chastity belts for everyone.
Conception takes only a moment but the cohesion of society requires a lifetime of nurturing and a variety of interrelationships.
Agreed, yes and so? Varity of inter-relationships? With who, what and where?
Life spans have increased, medicine has evolved with the onset of the sexual revolution. I look at what "male" heterosexuals have done in some countries with making woman cover their faces and walk ten paces behind a man and I am sickened.
Poor diversion. That’s male autonomy personified. Yes, I am sickened too. You’re using that to justify sodomy? I fail to see the connection.
For centuries women were used as slaves of men and this is the black and white world you seem to think is some sort of utopia or given?
And homosexuality is? Men can enslave young boys too. Still I fail to see the link that says sodomy is any kind of a solution.
Well it is the sexual revolution that has fostered the world we now live in of high technology and greater reason.
Really? Please elaborate.
The greatest societies that have ever prospered had sexual diversity.
Name one and please define what you think prosperity is, thanks.
Sexual diversity and equality is the pro creator not intercourse.
Yes, Rex sexual intercourse should not be just a recreational activity, but sexual diversity and equality are not the solutions we can just bide our time with. Yes, we have figured out ways to have children without intercourse. Hell let’s just put them on the market and sell them to those who find sexual intercourse appalling. Damn! What a solution, huh!
Without osmosis, cellular division, the sun, moon, air or the earth we would all die too so what is your point?
Wow, what a stretch. Ha!
All of these together are life givers as is human diversity and individuality.
Man is the life giver Rex. Yes, it is very important where he deposits his seed. There is only one place for life to continue if love, caring and nurturing are ever going to be understood and define and alternative lifestyles and sexual orientation as it is presently define just won’t get it. Like I said you have opposable thumbs, use them until we can better understand the male female universal paradigm. It just that simple.
For the body to say because I am not the eye, foot or ears or hand I am not of the body yet the body needs all of it parts respectively to be considered whole.
Wow, a lot of emphasis on the body Rex! We know we are more than that. Please do a little more research of what selfishness means.
The same goes for humanity it takes all kinds for the world to go round.
Wow, what a great rationalization. That solves everything doesn’t it, damn!
Your myopic statement is ignorant at best.
No! North just stated a fact.
We are interdependent on each other and our environment not just sexual organs.
Now try explaining that to a homosexual. Any man, any time and any where. Have you been to the Folsum Street Fair in San Francsico? You will see how so very proud they are of their sexual organs and all the fun they have with them. God damn it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!