2
   

Is this board anti-muslim?

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:05 pm
kickycan wrote:
Well, in general, Lash, my answer is to use some common sense.

Let's take the word "towelhead" for instance. If I used the word "towelhead" and others' reaction to it was negative, I might defend my usage of it. If it happened again, I might just go, "hey, people seem to be bothered by this, and it's sidetracking what I'm trying to get across. Maybe I won't use it anymore."

Just my opinion.

Although I have to admit, I really like the word, "pussified."

I appreciate you answering, but I am wondering if you really immediately quit using all the words that anyone reacts to negatively. People likely could be bothered by alot of what you say, profanity, jokes, references...and I just don't see you amending your speech to fit everyone's preferences. I'm serious. I'm not trying to trip you up or anything.

I have never used an epithet that addressed race, religion or sexual orientation to a person, or about them to another person IRL, but, I am tired of someone else telling me what I can say. I have a very hard time believing you submit to it, as well.

If we bend to everyone's preferences, there will be no communication.
0 Replies
 
mans
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:13 pm
Quote:
I have never used an epithet that addressed race, religion or sexual orientation to a person, or about them to another person IRL, but, I am tired of someone else telling me what I can say. I have a very hard time believing you submit to it, as well.

If we bend to everyone's preferences, there will be no communication.

i agree on that - i think we should all accept the religion of ourselves (and if not, you can always change Smile ), but most importantly, accept others as well. I think that is where we have gone wrong in the past - some people seem to think their way is the only way.
I hope one day everyone will be like that, but a perfect community is unlikely Sad
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:13 pm
Political correctness sucks
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:16 pm
au1929 wrote:
Political correctness sucks


Amen to that au1929. Rut ro! Shocked That wasn't too religious for you, was it? :wink: Laughing
0 Replies
 
mans
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:18 pm
lol
i think this section is very deep, and too much deepness makes me depressed, even though i find talking deep fun when i understand what i'm talking about.
and actually, i am confusing myself Smile
i need to find someplace funny - this is like a battle of the religions or whatever, only over the internet. Smile
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:19 pm
360. Not a clue!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:22 pm
I think I need to qualify my statement au1929, I was just thinking about it Idea

Political correctness sucks. Commons sense and decency don't suck. Laughing
0 Replies
 
mans
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:22 pm
got it, Lash :wink:
can't do PM, though.
ah well Smile
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:24 pm
Mans is fast! I needed to add:

Political correctness changes with the times. Common sense and decency should not change.

There, I think I got the complete thought out this time! Laughing
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:29 pm
political correctness stunts debate.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:31 pm
au1929 wrote:
political correctness stunts debate.


...and so does ill-manneredness. I guess there's a balance in there somewhere.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:33 pm
I have something to sell that's hard...

Oh wait, eh...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:37 pm
That's just funny.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:37 pm
au1929 wrote:
Momma Angel
What I find offensive is being continuously inundated with your religious beliefs. I for one do not give a damn about your religion or your religious beliefs.


What about being inundated with anything that you do not agree with? Do you censor someone because of their beliefs? Can you not ignore those things which are not pleasing to you? Are you any better than the people with whom you do not agree? When I read some of the things that you write that I think are downright foolish, I just read past it and figure that it is your right to write what you want. Oh, well.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:39 pm
snood wrote:
au1929 wrote:
political correctness stunts debate.


...and so does ill-manneredness. I guess there's a balance in there somewhere.

This is probably the best comment I've seen about the issue.

Au is right.

Actually, though I don't advocate ill-manneredness, it opens debate. Wide open. Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:41 pm
Spam is against the rules for a reason, IMO.

It signifies that someone has come here with the ulterior motive of selling something--using the people here.

It can be anything. A religion, as was her case.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:46 pm
Okay everybody, I have some jokes to sell. They will cost you $1.98 each. Guaranteed to make you laugh. If you don't laugh, double your money back. Laughing
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:48 pm
Setanta wrote:
nimh, in responding to Steve, wrote:
If it is the militant or dogmatic Islamists you are talking about, I do not think their motivation is 'good' or worthy of support, and have never thought or implied so.

You are ignoring, however, a cogent point which he is making. Mainstream chrisitanity, judaism, hinduism--none of them state that a holy warrior will be in paradise at the right hand of god in the instant of their death if they die in a holy cause.

"Jihad", what is usually translated as "holy war", does not actually have the equation with calling people to murderously immolate themselves and others, however. Of course there are extremist preachers who do make it about that - but then you're back exactly to my statement that it's not "the muslims" that pose the danger, but specific extremist groups among them. In "mainstream" Islam, as in mainstream Hinduism etc, the concept of religious murder as a shortcut to heaven is not accepted, or not accepted anymore. That's how there came to be a bunch of fatwas proclaimed by mainstream clergy against those who did do the exact thing you're talking about - suicide bombers of the London type (here's some examples and here's another one).
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 06:48 pm
We already heard the joke. It does seem a few bought it.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 07:01 pm
Was the question ever answered on whether this board is anti Muslim?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 01:52:30