1
   

Do you think Jesus died a virgin?

 
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Apr, 2003 09:32 pm
Weird Bible stories
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Apr, 2003 09:35 pm
When you get close to delivery you can totally feel the baby in the belly -- there's the head, there's the foot, ow there's the elbow -- so I'm sure old-timey midwives wouldn't have had a problem figuring out that a woman was carrying twins.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Apr, 2003 09:37 pm
As a kid that was lost on me.
0 Replies
 
mikey
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Apr, 2003 09:45 pm
mary magdalene seemed to kinda like show up everywhere, announced or unannounced. silently lurking somewhere in the shadows with the vino, goodies, herbs, etc. ever present-like.

and she was the favorite, the 13th disciple and most beloved of all his crew right?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 04:51 am
I had a friend who called their canary Onan - because, of course, he spilled his seed upon the ground.

They - the midwives - could detect foetal heartbeats, too.

I would have thought first born meant first out - but there you go - I mean, why would arms or anything that went back in count?

I have a young client who was born 10 minutes before his sister. I said - "Oh, you won the race?"

He looked thoughtful for a while, then said with a rueful smile - "No, she kicked me out."



You know - has it occurred to anyone else to wonder why Craven's life appears to be passing before his eyes?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 09:26 am
Naw, Craven's a cool dude who knows life's pleasures. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 10:17 am
dlowan, the expression is ****ing like a bunny. i don't know if you aussies use that term? then, of course, craven adds a late addition that this is supposed to be a serious conversation...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 10:49 am
"serious converstion" ha, ha, ha......
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 12:56 pm
People, the very question is erroneous, since Jesus Christ is not a regular human like me or anyone of the A2Kers. He is God the Son, part of the Trinity, therefore He cannot be assessed using criteria applied to regular people, whatever these people are, righteous or not.
Quote:
We believe in one God, the Father All-sovereign, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible;

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, and the only-begotten Son of God, Begotten of the Father before all the ages, Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father
[...]

This is The Creed of Nicea. The bolded part of the text shows the divine nature of the very body of Jesus; therefore, He does not experience the same urges the humans do.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:15 pm
and yet he bled and died
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:17 pm
Terry wrote:
And if Jesus, God, and the Holy Ghost are the same person, does that mean that he impregnated his own mother?

Immaculate conception was performed asexually, by miraculous ways, therefore, no incest should be regarded in this case; I hope, you did not mean any blasphemous accusations toward the Savior and the Virgin Mary.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:21 pm
dyslexia wrote:
and yet he bled and died

This was pre-scheduled by the Divine providence. And the Resurrection came later, that does not happen to the regular people that were executed.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:28 pm
steissd wrote:
People, the very question is erroneous, since Jesus Christ is not a regular human like me or anyone of the A2Kers. He is God the Son, part of the Trinity, therefore He cannot be assessed using criteria applied to regular people, whatever these people are, righteous or not.
Quote:
We believe in one God, the Father All-sovereign, maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible;

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, and the only-begotten Son of God, Begotten of the Father before all the ages, Light of Light, true God of true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father
[...]

This is The Creed of Nicea. The bolded part of the text shows the divine nature of the very body of Jesus; therefore, He does not experience the same urges the humans do.


steissd,

The question is not wrong, you just don't agree with it. I do not think Jesus was the son of God, you do.

Now that wasn't what I was asking, even if Jesus were the son of God he come to earth in a man's body and suffered man's sufferings.

Nowhere does Jesus or God show a distaste for sex, this is man's implication.

Therefore I pose the question if Jesus had sex while on earth.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:30 pm
well, needless to say there are believers and non-believers and as much as the believers like to "paganize" the non-believers, we will not refrain from criticism of believers. its a 2 way street and is not likely to change.
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:35 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
I do not think Jesus was the son of God, you do.

Well, in such a case we cannot argue; our basic approaches are so much different, that it will be impossible to find a compromise on anything pertaining to religion.
By the way, I though that you were a Roman Catholic, since you mentioned somewhere that you were Brazilian by origin. And Roman Catholics believe that Jesus Christ is God the Son...
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 01:59 pm
confusing logic steissd were you not Russian born ergo atheist?
0 Replies
 
steissd
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 02:14 pm
I changed opinion gradually, and now I should consider myself being a Christian (though I do not belong to any specific denomination). By the way, atheism is not a national religion of Russians. They are rather Eastern Orthodox Christians.
0 Replies
 
maxsdadeo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 02:21 pm
Mark me down for a "yes", and I'll ask him when I see him next.

Unfortunately, I may not be able to relay his answer.

So, I would heartily suggest you all ask him yourselves.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 02:26 pm
Quote:
It is not enough, Jesus tells us, to deal with the external and visible implications of your sexual choices: you must also deal with your inner life. The real battle is the battle for the mind. If you can win here, and reach a condition in which even mental adultery is unknown to you, then you will find it that much easier to deal with temptation in the physical arena. It would be easy to dismiss this concept of ?'adultery in the heart' as prudish, petty and legalistic - if it wasn't for the fact that pornography is one of the planet's biggest businesses and women and children the world over are prisoners of various forms of sexual slavery. Men are not the only ones guilty of sexual exploitation, but they are majority shareholders, and the language of Matthew 5:28 shows that Jesus knew this. At every stage of human technological growth, the pornographers have been there to re-invent their industry, adapting first to print, then to film and now, supremely,to the Internet. Call Jesus a killjoy if you will, but he was onto something here. C S Lewis writes, ?'Suppose you came to a country where you could fill a theatre by simply bringing a covered plate onto the stage and then slowly lifting the cover so as to let everyone see, just before the lights went out, that it contained a mutton chop or a bit of bacon. Should you not think that in that country, something had gone wrong with the appetite for food?' C.S.Lewis, Mere Christianity, quoted in Richard Foster, Money, Sex and Power, (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1985), p103

0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Apr, 2003 02:29 pm
Quote:
Jesus does not tell us to spend our whole lives running from our sexuality. But neither does he encourage us to seek gratification and fulfilment at all costs. Rather, he establishes a framework of grace and justice within which it is possible - and pleasurable - to express and explore our sexual nature without hurting others. This is the aim of Christian sexuality - the ultimate goal of the Biblical ?'Good Sex Guide' - that we are able to enjoy everything that God has given without destroying our fellow humans. The limits are there because the potential for pain and destruction is so vast. Where the hyper-religious can see no good in sexual activity, and the hyper-liberal can see no harm, Jesus sees that both are possible. He sees both the beauty and the boundaries; the pleasure and the pain.

The language of chastity, monogamy and fidelity may have an old-fashioned ring in our culture, but Jesus' remarkable approach to sexuality remains starkly relevant to our lives. In its courage, its honesty and its compassion, it has the potential not only to guide us but in many ways to heal our lives.

?'Adapted from "Humanifesto: the Rough Guide to the Sermon on the Mount" by Gerard Kelly, published by Spring Harvest / Paternoster, 2001'
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/15/2026 at 06:25:33