1
   

Army demands $700 for wounded soldier's armor

 
 
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 11:42 am
Seems to be absolute bureaucracy, if it's really true:

Quote:
February 07, 2006
Soldier pays for armor

Army demanded $700 from city man who was wounded



By Eric Eyre
Staff writer

The last time 1st Lt. William "Eddie" Rebrook IV saw his body armor, he was lying on a stretcher in Iraq, his arm shattered and covered in blood.

A field medic tied a tourniquet around Rebrook's right arm to stanch the bleeding from shrapnel wounds. Soldiers yanked off his blood-soaked body armor. He never saw it again.

But last week, Rebrook was forced to pay $700 for that body armor, blown up by a roadside bomb more than a year ago.

He was leaving the Army for good because of his injuries. He turned in his gear at his base in Fort Hood, Texas. He was informed there was no record that the body armor had been stripped from him in battle.

He was told to pay nearly $700 or face not being discharged for weeks, perhaps months.

Rebrook, 25, scrounged up the cash from his Army buddies and returned home to Charleston last Friday.

"I last saw the [body armor] when it was pulled off my bleeding body while I was being evacuated in a helicopter," Rebrook said. "They took it off me and burned it."

But no one documented that he lost his Kevlar body armor during battle, he said. No one wrote down that armor had apparently been incinerated as a biohazard.

Rebrook's mother, Beckie Drumheler, said she was saddened ?- and angry ?- when she learned that the Army discharged her son with a $700 bill. Soldiers who serve their country, those who put their lives on the line, deserve better, she said.

"It's outrageous, ridiculous and unconscionable," Drumheler said. "I wanted to stand on a street corner and yell through a megaphone about this."
Source
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 585 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 11:50 am
Well, you see Walter we in the US needed a big tax break for the rich and we also planned on Iraqi oil to pay our invasion expenses, then there's the foreign debt and the national debt. The man used the damn armor so he need to pay for it.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:55 pm
oic
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:56 pm
Damn good thing he didn't set of a patriot missile. Those babies are expensive
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2006 01:58 pm
I lossed once three mines - wasn't expensive, since I was on a minesweeper.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Army demands $700 for wounded soldier's armor
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/03/2026 at 03:58:54