0
   

Passage ...... Where do you go after you die

 
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2003 04:40 pm
Hey guys, you will never guess what I just read ... scientist used to believe that light always travels in a straight line ..... what a hoot huh .. . Very Happy Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2003 05:38 pm
snood wrote:
Agnosticism may seem like the most honest way for some to live, and intellectually I have no problem with that. But it is not for me, and I need the latitude to have my faith without derision from those who might think me ignorant.

It's funny - I have more in common with atheists - for it takes just as much faith to believe chance and physics created life as it does to believe God did.


You most assuredly do, Snood -- although I am astonished that you find that surprising.

Theists and atheists are both guessers about the unknown -- and try to justify their guesses with protestations of transcendent KNOWLEDGE!!! -- and faith in their "transcendent knowledge."

Of course, the theists KNOW there is a God and the atheists KNOW there are no gods - the stuff of laughter.

Agnostics say: I do not know -- and I do not see enough unambiguous evidence to cause me to guess in either direction.

Agnosticism is a recitation of the truth.

Makes one wonder why it bothers theists so much. They claim truth is important.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 May, 2003 07:42 pm
Please someone take a shot ...

What distinction/s separate Gods from Spirits?
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 08:28 am
Gods have magical power. The Judeo-Christian God is supposed to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Some gods have specific domains, such as thunder, volcanism, hunting, wisdom, etc. Creation of the universe and life is usually attributed to a god. Gods and spirits are both usually considered to be immortal, but sometimes can be killed. Gods may intervene in the affairs of mortals if sufficient prayer or sacrifices are made to them. Spirits may offer guidance, but their power to intervene physically may be limited.
0 Replies
 
Terry
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 08:59 am
Gods have control over nature and our lives. Their services can be bought, at a cost of worship and adulation, prayer, supporting their priesthood with sacrificed animals, fruits, money, etc. Some gods demand nothing but your soul.
0 Replies
 
twyvel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 11:26 am
JLNobody
Quote:
It's wonderful that You, the true you (i.e., CosmicBigYou, not littleyou, the separate/surrounded lonely little ego) are all there is. Thank you for reminding me.


It's wonderful indeed, it's beyond words. How can you ( I ) be " in here" when the minds contents is "out there".....?

It's a miracle that the simple image of this screen (or anything else) can appear at all. I mean, what is it?

Reality is beyond words because words are the map to or in reference to it but not it. But unfortunately most of us mistake the map for the territory. We live in a fairy tale of words and thoughts thinking, taking them to be what they represent. Yet do we know what they represent?

If an apple isn't an apple, then this body isn't this body and a thought isn't a thought, although that is not easy to grasp.

Well that's one angle......

Terry

Quote:
, I do not agree that my conscious awareness is "nothing." It is certainly real to me, the effects of its existence are observable by others, and the state of consciousness is as measurable by scientific methods as are quarks and electrons. There is still much to learn, but science has come a long way in the understanding of consciousness and brain functions.



I never said consciousness/awareness was not 'real' I said it is experientially 'nothing' as in not observable or perceivable. It is not present as an object of awareness for it IS the awareness.

Awareness is nothing objective, nothing that can be felt, smelt, seen, heard, touched or thought about. If you who are reading these words can also be ''read"...., preceived and thought about then it cannot be you the perrceiver. When you claim to observe awareness you are merely observing objects in awareness not the awareness for the awareness is doing the observing. (dualistically speaking that is). Some get it some don't, you apparently don't.

Science knows practically nothing about consciousness, and whatever they are measuring it is not consciousness. They are measuring, examining contents, contents, and more contents. Objects, objects and more objects.

Quote:
If there is a universal awareness, how come we are not universally aware of it?


I think some are.

But how come most of us are ignorant? Good question.

Quote:
I understand that you believe otherwise, but I have no reason to doubt that my perception of reality is a reasonably accurate representation of an objective universe made up of particles of matter (which may be waves of energy or vibrating strings but are not "nothing") that obey physical laws to produce the patterns of photons impinging on my retina.


Oh, there is something 'there' alright, I never said otherwise, we just don't know or maybe cannot know what that something is. We call it the objective universe, this body, consciousness, but they are mere symbols. We are always emerged in symbols, speaking about symbols, interacting with symbols, we are symbols to ourselves and each other. But you and I are not a mere symbol, not mere abstractions, not mere representations. If you are content to be a symbol to yourself, fine, I am not.

The photons never make it to your brain, rather a signal is send to the brain from the eyes and the the brain produces an image. So you (awareness) never see the photons. That they exist is more workings of the imagination, Smile



Gelisgesti

Quote:
What distinction/s separate Gods from Spirits?


What distinguishes a carrot from god? Or this, ' a ' from god, or spirit?

nothing

One cannot deviate from the Tao.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 11:45 am
Hi Twyvel

I see you still think your guesses about reality are better than the guesses of the theists and the atheists.

Hey, good for you.

And you may be right.

Which of course is another way of saying: You may be wrong.
0 Replies
 
twyvel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 12:28 pm
Yes, even more so.

Hi, yes I think there's something there Frank. That awareness cannot be observed is an indication that there is something there, something's going on. Whenever you look for the subject you only find objects of perception. If awareness is not these objects then it is this blank, or nothingness, or unknown who's looking. If awareness is these objects, then the subject---object split is an illusion. And it could be both.

It's like we are looking out of a window at the universe, body, thoughts and sensations, yet cannot turn around and look at the looker. We have only half or a part of the picture.

What do you think? Or do you choose not to engage this specific issue?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 12:42 pm
Twyvel

I do not know what the nature of reality is -- and I do not see any unambiguous evidence to point me in any particular direction.

You have a very well establish belief system -- but it is just a belief system.

Your arguments always seem to me to reduce to: There are a lot of unknowns.

With that I agree.

The implications of the fact that there are a lot of unknowns which you propose leave me cold.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 01:12 pm
If you're a christian, the Holy Ghost is a "spirit". The son of God, Jesus Christ is not a spirit.. Neither is the Father a spirit.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 01:13 pm
Angels aren't spirits either. They're physical, except you can't see them. Too small and thin.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 02:33 pm
New Haven wrote:
If you're a christian, the Holy Ghost is a "spirit". The son of God, Jesus Christ is not a spirit.. Neither is the Father a spirit.



Hummmm...rather poor wording -- or even worse logic.

Now which is it???

The "Holy Ghost" is either a spirit; not a spirit; or does not exist -- and that holds whether you are a Christian or not.

Jesus either was or was not the "son of God" and is either a spirit or not a spirit -- without regard to whether or not one is a Christian.

And the Father...ahhh, the father...well, the father....ahhh...who wants to talk about the Father anyway? The Father, I suspect, is that monster described in the first five books of the Bible -- and the less said about that guy the better. Or at least, that is the impression I get from my Christian friends.

So which is it, New Haven -- poor wording or poor logic???
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 05:21 pm
Your question begs another: Since he prefaced his comments with "If you're a Christian", can your "have you stopped beating your wife" style challenge be motivated by much else than the need to engage in yet another circular, petty argument?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 05:40 pm
snood wrote:
Your question begs another: Since he prefaced his comments with "If you're a Christian", can your "have you stopped beating your wife" style challenge be motivated by much else than the need to engage in yet another circular, petty argument?


Learn to read and you won't have to ask a question like that.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 05:45 pm
Good comeback! - I am, of course accordingly chastened, and will hasten to improve my comprehension skills... Razz
0 Replies
 
twyvel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 07:49 pm
Frank wrote:
Quote:
I do not know what the nature of reality is -- and I do not see any unambiguous evidence to point me in any particular direction.

You have a very well establish belief system -- but it is just a belief system.

Your arguments always seem to me to reduce to: There are a lot of unknowns.

With that I agree.

The implications of the fact that there are a lot of unknowns which you propose leave me cold.


That consciousness is not observerable is not a belief any more then the image of this screen is a belief or dependent on belief for it to be present to awareness. In as much as anything can be known, it is known. Although I agree there are many unknowns.


If it leaves you cold it leaves you cold, so be it.
0 Replies
 
Booman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 May, 2003 08:14 pm
Marking
0 Replies
 
the prince
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 May, 2003 09:23 am
Have you ever heard the story of Natchiketa?

Natchiketa, a young boy, sees his father, a Vedic rishi, give dhanas (offerings) to the gods. "What about me father?" asks Natchiketa.

"I will donate you to Yama (the god of death)," the father answers, more as a joke to get rid of the son.

But Natchiketa takes it seriously and goes to Yama, who unfortunately has gone out roaming. When Yama comes back after three days, he sees this youngster at his door and asks him what he wants. "I have been offered to you by my father."

"Impossible," says Yama, "your time has not come."

But the boy is adamant. So, to placate him, Yama offers him a boon. This is what Natchiketa asks Yama: "Some say that when one dies, one is -- and others that one is not. What is the truth?"

Yama, the mighty god of death, answers: "Ask me anything: riches, happiness, a hundred years, but not this question."

But Natchiketa refuses to relent. Yama's reluctant reply encapsulates India's eternal truth, which today only she holds in the world and which has been repeated in many of India's sacred texts, including the Bhagavad Gita: "Only the body dies O Natchiketa, the soul is immortal and is reborn life after life, till one reaches perfection."
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 May, 2003 10:15 am
Gautam wrote:
But Natchiketa refuses to relent. Yama's reluctant reply encapsulates India's eternal truth, which today only she holds in the world and which has been repeated in many of India's sacred texts, including the Bhagavad Gita: "Only the body dies O Natchiketa, the soul is immortal and is reborn life after life, till one reaches perfection."


So...you hold this to be an "eternal truth?"

This notion may be correct -- but we really do not know.

The Christian notion of life and death may be correct -- but we really do not know.

The atheistic notion of life and death may be correct -- but we really do not know.

Or at least, all indications are that we do not know.

That is why I choose to be an agnostic. I can hold my philosophy to be a truth -- and it is unassailable.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 May, 2003 10:33 am
Anyone had a near death experience??
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 04:25:01