Lol!!!!
That was logic as only cjhsa knows and uses it!
So, dlowan, you think those signs are going to protect you?
You wouldn't know logic if it bit you in your furry ass.
I think it is something unbelievable in times after the 30-years war that people talk about how many arms someone must have to protect himself but looses no word at all about the killed poor people and their families.
My thoughts are with them.
Mine too Walter, and what a shame they were given no chance to defend themselves by cowardly, brain dead policy makers.
Every time I enter a building with one of those "no firearms" signs I cringe, because I know that all the law abiding citizens with license to carry have to go back to their car and leave their weapon behind, while the real danger will simply ignore it.
cjhsa wrote:Mine too Walter, and what a shame they were given no chance to defend themselves by cowardly, brain dead policy makers.
Obviously you main concern - see your post above and your previous responses - is different to what you pretent to be here with two words for the first time.
Some things are just a given Walter.
All kidding (and efforts to be provocative) aside, cjhsa, do you really think a citizenry that walks and drives around fully armed all the time would prevent gun violence?
An armed society is a polite society.
