Roxxxanne wrote:Oh gosh, what a genius! A rtegular Miss Cleo. He bets on a clear favorite and then is going to convince us what a genius he is when the likley outcome transpires.
One thing I have learned is that nothing is a sure thing. It may be a longshot. But nothing is guaranteed.
"I have a CNN report and what you claim you heard - I'll go with CNN."
I'll go with what she actually said rather than your interpretation of what you mistakenly think "CNN" said. Landrie is being pressurred by Republicans who hold the purse strings to the re-building of NO.
Calls to her office have confirmed that she had not ruled out backing a filibuster as of early Friday. If it cae down to one vote, I am sure the Dems could count on her. Hillary Clinton also had said she was not supporting a filibuster, after thousands of calls, she relented and said she would support a filibuster, according to office staffers.
"And you heard every statement she made yesterday? "
I heard what she said about the filibuster. You obviously did not. Neither she nor CNN said she ruled out going along with a filibuster.
Things are looking pretty dim, but it is still not over.
You are nothing if not determined.
How did I possibly mistake what CNN reported:
Earlier Thursday, Sen. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana said she would oppose a filibuster.
Of course this is not the same as her saying:
"Listen up Roxxxxane, I fully intend to vote to close debate on the nomination. I am unequivocally not going to support a filibuster."
It doesn't take genius to realize that Alito will be confirmed, but it does take a certain demented fanaticism to keep predicting that he will not.
Keep making your calls and sending your e-mails though. Your disappointment will be that much sweeter.