1
   

TRINITY: SATAN'S BIGGEST LIE

 
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 02:55 am
ali87,

That did not answer my question. Were you addressing me or someone else?
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:00 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Excuse me ali87,

Isn't it true that the Muslims were also involved in the Crusades? Does it matter who started the wars? What matters is both Christianity and Muslims were involved. So does Islam allow this?



MY WHOLE POINT IS WHAT PPL DO ON BEHALF OF RELIGION DOES NOT MAKE IT THE RELIGIONS TEACHINGS. IM FROM PERSIA, AND MY LAND WAS RAPED AND CONQURED BY UMAR'S ARMY, HE COMMITED A CRIME AGAINST ISLAM AND HUMANITY, AND THIS WAS AFTER THE PROPHET MOHAMMAD'S DEATH, OR HE WOULD'VE NEVER ALLOWED IT. IT CLEARLY SAYS IN THE QURAN NOT TO KILL INOCCENTS AT WAR, TO SHOW THEM MERCY, TO LEAVE THE WOMEN, CHILDREN, AND ELDERS, AND LET THOSE FREE WHO SURRENDUR THEMSELVES THOSE WHO DROP THEIR WEAPONS IN FRONT OF MUSLIMS, AND OUR PROPHET SAID THE SAME THINGS, BUT AFTER HIS DEATH IT ALL BECAME FOR POWER. THIS IS WHAT THESE CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES USE AGAINST ISLAM. YOU THINK TIME REVERTS BACK AND THE TEXTS OF THE QURAN CHANGE BASED ON WHAT THOSE PPL DID? THOSE PPL WERE NOT TRUE MUSLIMS, THEY JUST WANTED POWER.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:06 am
ali87,

I understand your frustration at people thinking all Muslims are terrorists. Alot of people think Christians are just as bloodthirsty as they feel Muslims are. As long as there is one in any religion that will take it too far, this kind of thinking will never disappear.

The only thing any one of us can do is to try to be an example of what it is supposed to be about. I don't think all Muslims are terrorists, ali87. A lot of people don't think that. But, I think the more you try to tell them the more they might believe it. That old saying "I think one does protest too much" seems to stick in people's minds. It has been said about me and my Christian beliefs. Don't take it to heart. You do what you feel is the right thing to do. Just remember that everyone has a right to what they believe. We do not get to make the judgment about who is right and who is wrong in their beliefs, ali87. We both know there is a much higher authority.
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:10 am
Human equality in Christianity?

Introduction: When it comes to human affairs and relations, slavery is one of the back bones of the spine of Christianity and its principles: "All who are under the yoke of slavery should consider their masters worthy of full respect, so that God's name and our teaching may not be slandered. (From the NIV Bible, 1 Timothy 6:1)"

"Let all who are under the yoke of slavery regard their masters as worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be defamed. (From the RSV Bible, 1 Timothy 6:1)"

"A student is not greater than the teacher. A slave is not greater than the master. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 10:24)"

We clearly see that the Bible is not a book for freeing slaves. Slavery was practiced very badly during the times of Judaism and Christianity, and was fought against and ended during the times of Islam. It is part of the Bible's "teaching" to practice and promote slavery! And fighting it would "slander" or "defame" the teachings of the Bible.

My Challenge: I invite any Jew or Christian to bring me one Bible verse that orders its followers to free slaves!
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:13 am
Is there human equality in the Bible in both the Old and the New Testaments?

A brief look at the Old Testament:

Let us look at Exodus 21:12 "Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death." This verse from the Bible is very straight forward. If you kill an innocent human being, then you must die.

Let us look at both Exodus 20:13, and Deuteronomy 5:17 "You shall not murder." Both verses have the same exact quote, and they both order not to kill normal human beings.

Let us look at Deuteronomy 27:25 "Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person. Then all the people shall say, 'Amen!'" This verse and the above verses so far are talking about normal human beings. They equalize between normal human beings.

Now let us look at Exodus 21:20-21 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property." Notice how the Bible doesn't recognize the slave male or female as a normal human being. If the master beats his servant to death, then the master will not get the death punishment or penalty. He will only be punished, but not to death. This punishment mighty be even a light one such as a single light whip since the punishment was not determined.

Let us look at Deuteronomy 24:7 "If a man is caught kidnapping one of his brother Israelites and treats him as a slave or sells him, the kidnapper must die. You must purge the evil from among you." This verse quite clearly states that the Israeli is better in human value than any other human being in the eyes of GOD. If an Israeli is treated as a slave, then we would have the world's greatest problems. But however, it is ok to treat others as slaves, and to kill them too according to Exodus 21:20 above.

Let us look at Leviticus 25:39 "If one of your countrymen becomes poor among you and sells himself to you, do not make him work as a slave." This verse seems to despise the slaves by ordering people to be merciful on others from the same tribe and not to treat them bad and not to make them work as slaves. It is quite obvious that his verse doesn't believe in human equality.
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:13 am
Is there human equality in the Bible in both the Old and the New Testaments?

A brief look at the Old Testament:

Let us look at Exodus 21:12 "Anyone who strikes a man and kills him shall surely be put to death." This verse from the Bible is very straight forward. If you kill an innocent human being, then you must die.

Let us look at both Exodus 20:13, and Deuteronomy 5:17 "You shall not murder." Both verses have the same exact quote, and they both order not to kill normal human beings.

Let us look at Deuteronomy 27:25 "Cursed is the man who accepts a bribe to kill an innocent person. Then all the people shall say, 'Amen!'" This verse and the above verses so far are talking about normal human beings. They equalize between normal human beings.

Now let us look at Exodus 21:20-21 "If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property." Notice how the Bible doesn't recognize the slave male or female as a normal human being. If the master beats his servant to death, then the master will not get the death punishment or penalty. He will only be punished, but not to death. This punishment mighty be even a light one such as a single light whip since the punishment was not determined.

Let us look at Deuteronomy 24:7 "If a man is caught kidnapping one of his brother Israelites and treats him as a slave or sells him, the kidnapper must die. You must purge the evil from among you." This verse quite clearly states that the Israeli is better in human value than any other human being in the eyes of GOD. If an Israeli is treated as a slave, then we would have the world's greatest problems. But however, it is ok to treat others as slaves, and to kill them too according to Exodus 21:20 above.

Let us look at Leviticus 25:39 "If one of your countrymen becomes poor among you and sells himself to you, do not make him work as a slave." This verse seems to despise the slaves by ordering people to be merciful on others from the same tribe and not to treat them bad and not to make them work as slaves. It is quite obvious that his verse doesn't believe in human equality.
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 03:23 am
Perhaps the best example I can provide regarding Laws developing gradually in the Noble Quran is the ending of the Judeo-Christians' and Pagans' slavery in Arabia. Let us look at the following Noble Verses:



Slavery seems to be allowed:

Note: "Right hand possession" are the human-captives of war who lived as slaves among Muslims.

"Serve God, and join not any partners with Him; and do good- to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, those in need, neighbours who are near, neighbours who are strangers, the companion by your side, the wayfarer (ye meet), and what your right hands possess: For God loveth not the arrogant, the vainglorious;- (The Noble Quran, 4:36)"

"If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice. (The Noble Quran, 4:3)"

"Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath God ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and God is All-knowing, All-wise. (The Noble Quran, 4:24)"

"If any of you have not the means wherewith to wed free believing women, they may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess: And God hath full knowledge about your faith. Ye are one from another: Wed them with the leave of their owners, and give them their dowers, according to what is reasonable: They should be chaste, not lustful, nor taking paramours: when they are taken in wedlock, if they fall into shame, their punishment is half that for free women. This (permission) is for those among you who fear sin; but it is better for you that ye practise self-restraint. And God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. (The Noble Quran, 4:25)"
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 08:48 am
Good morning ali87,

Is there a reason why you posted nothing about slavery from the New Testament? Your last three posts referenced only the Old Testament.

Just curious.....................
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 09:15 am
I was christened in a Unitarian chapel

definition of Unitarian

1. An adherent of Unitarian Universalism.
2. A monotheist who is not a Christian.
3. A Christian who is not a Trinitarian.


hope all clear. Ali you must be a Unitarian too.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 09:27 am
Ali87, I think this issue is a complex one because what we think of slavery was not necessarily what slavery meant in those times.

I did a little searching and found at least one website which has explored this subject (there were a couple others, for anyone interested, just google in slavery bible.)


http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qnoslave.html
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 09:46 am
Thank you revel. I do believe that slavery in the Bible was much different than what slavery in the US was.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 12:57 pm
ali87 wrote:
mesquite once again you make a flying statement hoping it would pass:

"there is NO surviving quran dating to Mohammad's time."
if you're gonna say something, atleast provide some reference, have some proof to back up ur claim. now i will refute your LIE AGAIN by providing the readers a link about the preservation of the Quran, its too long to copy everything, so ill just provide the link, it also has photos of the very first Quran:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/quran/textual.htm

This quote from your own reference supports exactly what I said.
"there is NO surviving quran dating to Mohammad's time."

Quote:
Nor does he blindly accept that the earliest extant Qur'anic manuscripts, in Istanbul and Tashkent, were the ones distributed by [Uthman but leaves open the possibility that these MSS like 27 other ones from the first century Hijri listed on p. 316f. might be the first copies, from 49 A.H. at the earliest (p. 104).


ali87 wrote:
now as for the source of the english translation of ibn ishaq's (scholar) writings, it is Alfred Guillaume (who himself was a christian). he was the main translator of ibn ishaq's writings in the west.

I have no idea what the religious beliefs of Alfred Guillaume were. Do you have some reference where he stated them?

ali87 wrote:
i wonder what christians would think if a muslim translated a scholar's writings about the bible! (by the way did you know many scientists and scholars were executed by churchs orders in europe, for speaking against christianity?

As I said before, If you have a problem with his translation, why not provide a specific correction rather than generalizations. I provided specific page numbers from his book for my quotes of which I only supplied two and you objected to one. Does that mean that you are OK with the account of Umm Qirfa?
from Guillaume, op cit, page 665:

"....and Umm Qirfa Fatima was taken prisoner. She was a very old women, wife of Malik. Her daughter and Abdullah Masada were also taken. Zayd ordered Qays to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly (Tabari, by putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two.)


If you really think the Guillaume translations are so bad, then why did you use them yourself? Looks very similar to the picking and choosing that many Christians also are partial to.

As for the rest of your tirade, Islam IS what muslims did and DO in the name of Islam, just the same as Christianity IS what Christians did and DO in the name of Christianity.

Some muslims would like to pretend that the Hadiths are insignificant, just a some Christians would like to do the same with the OLD Testament, but the fact remains that both are a big part of their respective religions.

So long as religious leaders continue to preach hate and self righteousness using the Bible, Koran, Torah, or any other ancient text from a more primitive time, humanity will continue to suffer.

The tone of your writing just helps to make my point.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 05:00 pm
very well said mesquite
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:28 pm
"....and Umm Qirfa Fatima was taken prisoner. She was a very old women, wife of Malik. Her daughter and Abdullah Masada were also taken. Zayd ordered Qays to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly (Tabari, by putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two.)


prove to me that this was under mohammad's command, did prophet mohammad specifically say go and do such and such to this woman? if you can justify that, then i wont take him as my prophet, just like i dont take the bible and christianity as God almighty's true words, because comparing the bible with the noble Quran, it shows me how corrupt and racist the bible and christianity is. so again, this is my challenge to you: prove to me that prophet mohammad specifically ordered for the woman to be tortured. if you do, then i won't accept him as a true prophet but if you can't then you can't.
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:36 pm
revel wrote:
Ali87, I think this issue is a complex one because what we think of slavery was not necessarily what slavery meant in those times.

I did a little searching and found at least one website which has explored this subject (there were a couple others, for anyone interested, just google in slavery bible.)


http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qnoslave.html




YOU ARE RIGHT SLAVERY WAS DIFFERENT IN THE BIBLE, THAN IN AMERICA, IN THE BIBLE ANIMALS AND SLAVES WERE TREATED EQUALLY. ATLEAST IN AMERICA THEY CUT THEM SOME SLACK, THEY WERENT RAPED AND BRUTALIZED AS BADLY AS IN THE BIBLICAL TIMES.

(AND REMEMBER THESE WERE LAWS BY GOD IN THE BIBLE, so for anyone to say the bible is telling a story or that they were traditions is completly absured as i proved that those were LAWS BY GOD MADE IN THE BIBLE.

AGAIN:

My Challenge: I invite any Jew or Christian to bring me one Bible verse that orders its followers to free slaves!


My Challenge: I invite any Jew or Christian to bring me one Bible verse that orders its followers to free slaves!



My Challenge: I invite any Jew or Christian to bring me one Bible verse that orders its followers to free slaves!
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:39 pm
ali87,

You may want to check your facts a bit. There were some terrible things done to slaves in the U.S. They were treated worse than animals! They were beaten, raped, and brutalized!

I don't think you would get too many to agree that they were "cut some slack."
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:42 pm
mesquite wrote:
ali87 wrote:
mesquite once again you make a flying statement hoping it would pass:

"there is NO surviving quran dating to Mohammad's time."
if you're gonna say something, atleast provide some reference, have some proof to back up ur claim. now i will refute your LIE AGAIN by providing the readers a link about the preservation of the Quran, its too long to copy everything, so ill just provide the link, it also has photos of the very first Quran:

http://www.answering-christianity.com/quran/textual.htm

This quote from your own reference supports exactly what I said.
"there is NO surviving quran dating to Mohammad's time."

Quote:
Nor does he blindly accept that the earliest extant Qur'anic manuscripts, in Istanbul and Tashkent, were the ones distributed by [Uthman but leaves open the possibility that these MSS like 27 other ones from the first century Hijri listed on p. 316f. might be the first copies, from 49 A.H. at the earliest (p. 104).


ali87 wrote:
now as for the source of the english translation of ibn ishaq's (scholar) writings, it is Alfred Guillaume (who himself was a christian). he was the main translator of ibn ishaq's writings in the west.

I have no idea what the religious beliefs of Alfred Guillaume were. Do you have some reference where he stated them?

ali87 wrote:
i wonder what christians would think if a muslim translated a scholar's writings about the bible! (by the way did you know many scientists and scholars were executed by churchs orders in europe, for speaking against christianity?

As I said before, If you have a problem with his translation, why not provide a specific correction rather than generalizations. I provided specific page numbers from his book for my quotes of which I only supplied two and you objected to one. Does that mean that you are OK with the account of Umm Qirfa?
from Guillaume, op cit, page 665:

"....and Umm Qirfa Fatima was taken prisoner. She was a very old women, wife of Malik. Her daughter and Abdullah Masada were also taken. Zayd ordered Qays to kill Umm Qirfa and he killed her cruelly (Tabari, by putting a rope to her two legs and to two camels and driving them until they rent her in two.)


If you really think the Guillaume translations are so bad, then why did you use them yourself? Looks very similar to the picking and choosing that many Christians also are partial to.

As for the rest of your tirade, Islam IS what muslims did and DO in the name of Islam, just the same as Christianity IS what Christians did and DO in the name of Christianity.

Some muslims would like to pretend that the Hadiths are insignificant, just a some Christians would like to do the same with the OLD Testament, but the fact remains that both are a big part of their respective religions.

So long as religious leaders continue to preach hate and self righteousness using the Bible, Koran, Torah, or any other ancient text from a more primitive time, humanity will continue to suffer.

The tone of your writing just helps to make my point.



NOW IM GOING TO TURN THE TABLE AROUND ON YOU:




Instant Death to Apostates (those who desert their religion) in the Bible in both the Old Testament and the New Testament:

It is often believed that the Bible gives absolute religious freedom to everyone. Most of the Christians in the United States and the the West think that the freedom of choice and speech that they have comes originally from the Bible. Let's just see how accurate this myth really is.

Let us look at Deuteronomy 13:6-9 "If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying: Let us go and worship other gods (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other, or gods of other religions), do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people."

Also let us look at Deuteronomy 17:3-5 "And he should go and worship other gods and bow down to them or to the sun or the moon or all the army of the heavens, .....and you must stone such one with stones and such one must die."

This verse was sent to me by Yusif 65; may Allah Almighty always be pleased with him: 2 Chronicles 15:13 "All who would not seek the LORD, the God of Israel, were to be put to death, whether small or great, man or woman."

Also let us look at Romans 1:20-32 (from the New Testament) "20. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--his eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
21. For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
22. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools
23. and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
24. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another.
25. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised. Amen.
26. Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.
27. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
28. Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
29. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,
30. slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
31. they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless.
32. Although they know God's righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them."



Also psychics must be put to death. Let us look at Leviticus 20:27 "And as for a man or woman in whom there proves to be a mediumistic spirit or spirit of prediction, they should be put to death without fail. They should pelt them to death with stones. Their own blood is upon them."

The above verses clearly show that the Bible doesn't tolerate apostates. Jesus did honor the Old Testament's laws and ordered his followers to follow the Old Testament until the day of Judgment:

"Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law (the Old Testament) or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke or a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law (the Old Testament) until everything is accomplished. (Matthew 5:17-18)"

Christians always say as an excuse that an Old Testament law does not apply to them. According to Matthew 5:17-18, we clearly see that Jesus honored the Old Testament, and forced Christians to follow the unmodified laws of it that have not been replaced by newer ones in the New Testament. The Old Testament as we clearly see above orders the immediate killing of apostates/renegades. The New Testament as we also clearly see above, orders the death of the apostates/renegades. And according to Matthew 5:17-18 above, apostates/renegades in Christianity must be put to death simultaneously.

By the way, please visit: Christians are obligated to follow the Old Testament.


Also, during the middle centuries when the Church used to rule over everything, the minority Christians and the Christian Scientists were slaughtered and put to death by the majority ones just because the Priests and Ministers of the High Church decided to call as "heresies" or "apostates". The Bible does give clear authority to the Priests and Ministers to call someone an apostate:

"The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man's judgment. (1 Corinthians 2:15)"



Conclusion:

The Bible in both the Old Testament and the New Testament doesn't tolerate apostates, and it orders for them to be killed. The Bible does order men and women (spiritual leaders and religious people) to be judgmental, and to kill those who don't agree with them by stoning them to death.

The man-made myth about Bible being a "book of love" is clearly contradicted for being the biggest judgmental and punishing book.
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:44 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
ali87,

You may want to check your facts a bit. There were some terrible things done to slaves in the U.S. They were treated worse than animals! They were beaten, raped, and brutalized!

I don't think you would get too many to agree that they were "cut some slack."



OH IM SORRY, OK BUT, HOW DOES THAT JUSTIFY THAT THE BIBLE IS NOT A RACIST BOOK, AND THAT IT CLEARLY GLORIFIES AND ALLOES SLAVERY, AND THAT THEY WERE TREATED LIKE DIRT? CAN YOU JUSTIFY THE VERSES I PROVIDED FROM THE BIBLE REGARDING SLAVERY?
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:45 pm
AGAIN, CAN YOU GUYS BRING A PRIEST IN HERE, SO MAYBE HE CAN ANSWER MY QUESTION!


I invite any Jew or Christian to bring me one Bible verse that orders its followers to free slaves!
0 Replies
 
ali87
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jan, 2006 11:47 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
ali87,

You may want to check your facts a bit. There were some terrible things done to slaves in the U.S. They were treated worse than animals! They were beaten, raped, and brutalized!

I don't think you would get too many to agree that they were "cut some slack."



PLEASE ANSWER THIS TO ME MA, PLEASE GIVE ME ONE VERSE FROM THE BIBLE THAT ORDERS ITS FOLLOWERS TO FREE SLAVES
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 01:27:45