1
   

Ladies...How Do you Know?

 
 
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 07:48 am
Ladies, how do you know that you can trust your husband?

Scott Peterson arrested in pregnant wife's death as bodies found on shore identified

By Brian Melley, Associated Press, 4/19/03




CHRONOLOGY


Dec. 24, 2002: Laci Peterson reported missing from her Modesto, Calif., home by her husband, Scott Peterson. He says he came home from a fishing trip to Berkeley Marina and his wife, who was eight months pregnant, wasn't there.

Dec. 28: Authorities search water near Berkeley Marina for the first time.

Dec. 31: Modesto police shift their focus in the case to foul play. "The investigation is progressing with that as the main focus, but we have not ruled out other possibilities," homicide detective Jon Buehler says.

Jan. 3, 2003: Modesto police ask the public for help verifying the whereabouts of Scott Peterson in the days before Christmas. In Berkeley, police spend hours combing the waters near the marina.

Jan. 9: A sonar search in the water near the marina reveals an object that authorities think is a body. It turns to be an anchor.

Jan. 14: Authorities and friends expand their search to Southern California.

Jan. 17: Laci Peterson's family and friends hold a news conference to demand that Scott Peterson tell authorities everything he knows about the case.

Jan. 18: As suspicion of Scott Peterson grows, authorities investigate his whereabouts in connection with the disappearance of a San Luis Obispo woman in 1996, when Scott and Laci Peterson lived there. Authorities later determine he had nothing to do with the second missing woman.

Jan. 19: Scott Peterson brings search for his missing wife to Los Angeles, where he and his family distribute fliers to volunteers at a hotel.

Jan. 23: Laci Peterson's family says Scott Peterson told authorities he had been involved with another woman.

Jan. 24: One month after Laci Peterson disappeared, Amber Frey, a massage therapist from Fresno, comes forward and confirms she had an intimate romantic relationship with Scott Peterson.

Jan. 28: In a televised interview, Scott Peterson admits he had a relationship with Frey and says he had told his wife about it. "It wasn't anything that would break us apart," he says.

Feb. 5: Laci Peterson's family members step up their criticism of Scott Peterson, saying he sold his pregnant wife's car and considered selling the couple's house.

Feb. 10: Laci Peterson's expected due date. "Everybody's aware of it," says Modesto police Sgt. Ron Cloward.

Feb. 17: Scott Peterson's mother, Jackie, tells The Associated Press her family believes kidnappers abducted Laci Peterson with intentions of holding her captive until she delivered the baby.

Feb. 18: Authorities issue a search warrant for the Petersons' home in Modesto, where they remove possible evidence and take measurements.

March 6: Modesto police officially declare the case a homicide.

March 12: Authorities search San Francisco Bay again.

April 14: The body of a woman and a male fetus that washed ashore in Richmond, Calif., are found.

April 18: Police in San Diego arrest Scott Peterson. Attorney General Bill Lockyer says bodies found in Richmond are those of Laci Peterson and her unborn son.

ON THE WEB


www.lacipeterson.com

www.modestopolice.com


MODESTO, Calif. — Authorities said genetic odds "in the billions" proved that two bodies found on the California shore were Laci Peterson and her baby. The announcement came hours after the missing Modesto woman's husband was arrested in their deaths.

Prosecutors said they plan to charge Scott Peterson, 30, with double murder, which would make him eligible for the death penalty.

Officials wouldn't discuss possible motives in the slaying of his pregnant wife, whose body washed ashore earlier this week. Modesto Police Chief Roy Wasden refused to describe the evidence or say how Laci Peterson died, but he said it appeared she was killed the day before Christmas because no "credible witness" saw or heard from her after that.

On Friday, hours before the genetic test results on the bodies were released, plainclothes agents tracking Scott Peterson's movements with phone taps and vehicle sensors pulled him over as he was driving in the San Diego area, where his parents live, and arrested him.

Attorney General Bill Lockyer said they feared Scott Peterson might try to flee. His dark hair was dyed blond and he had a beard a when he was booked into the Stanislaus County jail Friday night. His arraignment is expected early next week.

The bodies of 27-year-old Laci Peterson and her infant son, his umbilical cord still attached, washed ashore about three miles from where Scott Peterson said he was fishing the morning his wife disappeared.

Wasden said authorities had no other suspects in her death. That a $50,000 reward for information leading to her body remained unclaimed "continued to reinforce that one person knew what happened to Laci and where Laci was" he said.

"This is a case where it's a process of elimination," Wasden told CNN Saturday morning. "We never were able to eliminate Scott."

Peterson's attorney, Kirk McAllister, did not immediately return telephone messages for comment.

The bodies were identified through a comparison with DNA samples from Scott Peterson and Laci Peterson's parents.

"There is no question in our minds that the unidentified female is Laci Peterson. The unidentified fetus is the biological child of Laci and Scott Peterson," Lockyer said. "We're scientifically convinced the match is one in billions."

A spokeswoman for Laci Peterson's family said relatives were devastated by the confirmation of the deaths, but grateful they finally had an answer after months of uncertainty.

"Families in their circumstances will always tell you the worst thing is not knowing," said family spokeswoman Kim Peterson, executive director of the Carole Sund-Carrington Memorial Reward Foundation. "I don't know if relief is the right word. ... The waiting this week has been horrific for them."

From almost the moment his wife was reported missing, Scott Peterson's moves and statements have been scrutinized by authorities.

Modesto police seized his boat, pickup truck and nearly 100 items from the couple's house but had not formally named him as a suspect in his wife's disappearance.

Peterson traded in his wife's Land Rover for a new pickup truck, considered selling their home and eventually admitted an extramarital affair with a massage therapist while his wife was pregnant with the couple's baby.

Shortly after, Peterson said he'd told his wife about the affair in the days before she vanished.

"It was not a positive, obviously ... but it was not something that we weren't dealing with," he told ABC's "Good Morning America." "It wasn't anything that would break us apart."

The affair turned Laci Peterson's family against the son-in-law they had earlier supported. They begged him to cooperate with Modesto police, who had labeled him "uncooperative."

Scott Peterson, a fertilizer salesman, launched his own search effort, separate from the one organized by his wife's family and sanctioned by police. At one point, as searchers looked in the San Francisco Bay and around Modesto, Scott Peterson showed up in Los Angeles to distribute fliers to volunteers at a local hotel.

"We simply have to expand the geographical area," he said at the time.

In February, Scott Peterson told MSNBC he missed his wife and the son she had already named Conner. She was eight months pregnant when she disappeared.

"I can't drive. I can't sleep," he said then. "Sometimes I feel I just can't do it. I feel like I'm in a dark corner and I just can't function."




Boston Globe Online Edition

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


© Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,840 • Replies: 24
No top replies

 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:02 am
New Haven, surely you're not saying that all men are untrustworthy based on the behavior of Scott Peterson.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:16 am
Is that relevant to the question posted?
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:16 am
How does one know they can trust anybody, really? I would think that giving up faith in people for blind paranoia would be disastorous for all.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:21 am
Better blind paranoia, than dead human.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:25 am
I do believe that a bit of paranoia is adaptive, but too much is constricting!
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:29 am
A little paranoia is a good thing, but if you take it to the illogical conclusion that nobody can be trusted due to the actions of a few insane individuals, we are already on a rocky road back to the dark ages in terms of our development as human beings, and as a society.
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:29 am
If you know the man, you married, you'll know whether or not he can be trusted. That's why it doesn't pay to "jump " right into marriage, at "first blush".
0 Replies
 
New Haven
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:30 am
A bit of caution can go a long way.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:30 am
A little paranoia could probably be more aptly described as 'instinct', which most women have in spades, I think....
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 08:31 am
Oh, and I agree regarding marriage...Smile
0 Replies
 
Swimpy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 09:07 am
The question New Haven asked:
Quote:
Ladies, how do you know that you can trust your husband?


Maybe I misunderstood the meaning of your question, New Haven. I think one cannot spend a lot of time being suspicious of one's spouse without any grounds for that suspicion.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 09:12 am
men, how do you know you can trust your wife? A large and growing number of university research reports is indicating that men are about as likely as women to suffer from relationship violence. One study by the renowned University of Calgary researcher Eugen Lupri, reported that while 17.8% of husbands had admitted to abusing their female partners, 23.3% of the wives admitted to abusing their male partners(1). While similar studies show slightly different results, there is a consistent trend of about one in five women and one in five men suffering from domestic violence.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 11:00 am
The Killer Wives are MUCH more scary, IMO.
They fix you breakfast every day,...and then one day, they've just had it.

They smile and put arsenic in your scrambled eggs...

Out of nowhere!
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 11:41 am
Whoa....reminds me, just rewatched 'Misery' last night Shocked
0 Replies
 
Gala
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 12:33 pm
sofia, but the killer wives have been picking up dirty underwear and socks for x amount of years. whereas killer husbands want to eliminate the wife so they can get on with another woman. neither constitute grounds for murder, b ut killer husbands seem scarier.
0 Replies
 
Violet Lake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 12:37 pm
How long did they know each other & date before they were married? Just wondering if she jumped into it...
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 01:21 pm
Gala--
The predictability of the husbands make them less scary to me. The "snap" of the wife is less predictable and mucho scarioso, IMV.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 09:15 pm
It probably never even crossed her mind that he could/would someday hurt her.

When Scott Peterson sold his wifes' car, less than a month after she went "missing", I knew then and there that he'd done it. Where was the hope, the faith that she may still be alive?

The authorities wasted alot of time in this case but they got his ass in the end and that's what matters. They ought to give her daddy a rubber hose and three minutes alone with that worthless piece of trash.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 10:41 pm
Re: Ladies...How Do you Know?
b]Ladies, how do you know that you can trust your husband[/b]?

First, can I say that I'm no lady ... I'm a WOMAN! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy

Secondly, It seems that that nice, gentle person you got involved with years ago can turn into something QUITE STRANGE during the ol' male midlife crisis! Shocked Rolling Eyes Confused
I just wonder why this particular chap just didn't leave his wife like others have done, when they developed itchy feet?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ladies...How Do you Know?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 01:54:24