Momma Angel wrote:Brandon,
I can give you no scientific proof of God. I can only give you my experiences. No, I don't need proof. Why? I just don't. I believe. I have faith. If I had to tell you exactly at the second I believed just why I believed, I can't tell you. It's like you either understand something or you don't understand it. Through communication you hopefully gain understanding. I believe and I will always believe.
This begs the question of why you started this topic in the first place. If you cannot provide any proof for your belief and ask us not to expect any proof, then why must you hold us to the same standard for the opposing belief (of there being no God)?
You cannot provide proof, fair enough. Your belief in God is based on some kind of feeling, fair enough. It's not explicable, fair enough.
To me, this brings up a few questions:
1. How do you expect us to understand your position, if you cannot explain it to us?
2. What is the underlying motive for wanting to know the opposite side better?
3. Is your faith inexplicable because you do not wish to further explore your belief in God, for fear that you will lose your faith?