okie wrote:For crying out loud, I figured your little thought is Bush is tapping American Citizens, not Al Qaeda.
Your words, I asked you to back YOUR WORDS. Geez. you can't do it I guess.
Quote: I knew your angle of argument. You are grasping at straws.
The only one grasping at straws is you okie. YOUR WORDS.. NOT MINE.. YOURS.
Quote:The purpose of the program is to catch terrorists, not whether people are buying drugs from their neighbors or something, I'm not sure what people are so afraid of? The point is an American citizen, or non-citizen in the U.S. is either calling overseas or receiving calls from overseas wherein the number or source has been filtered as being suspicious and possibly connected to terrorist cells. What is your rampant paranoia all about anyway?
YOUR WORDS okie.. You said dems. Let me quote you again....
Quote:Parados, I am consistent. Bush is simply more pro-defense than the Democratic Party. Hey, they even wish to impeach him for tapping into Al Qaida phone conversations.
I asked for support for this statement YOU MADE.. YOUR WORDS. Your deflections don't change your words or my request for you to back up those words YOU posted.
Quote:Most people have figured out that the Republican Party is more pro-defense than the Democratic Party. I don't know why this is mysterious to you? Where have you been? They made fun of Reagan for building up the military, for his star wars program, some of the weapons, etc. Go back and research it yourself. What did Clinton do during the 90's about terrorism? Zilch, nothing, as far as I can tell. He wanted to make terrorists into a law enforcement problem, not a military problem. After the first Trade Center bombing, he did nothing.
Nothing? Really? 13 convictions is nothing these days? Wow. Tell us again, when did Bush get Osama? I keep forgetting that exact date.
Quote:Hussein kicked the inspectors out of Iraq and what did he do? Nothing.
Hmm.. seems Bush did nothing in Pakistan just yesterday about Al Qaeda's number 2 man by your standards.
Quote: I remember when Democrats said the CIA wasn't important anymore, the military wasn't as important, because the Cold War was over. Also, Clinton's justice department said agencies could not share data on terrorists. This was really brilliant. I am being sarcastic. They cared more about protecting his backside on information about illegal campaign funds from China than they did about terrorists. If you think the Democrats are so pro-defense, then make your case. I haven't seen a case.
You dismissed my facts while presenting none of your own. Carter spent more of GDP on military than Bush has. Spending isn't important for support? Oh. wait. That's right Reagan spent money but we should remember
Quote:He happened to fall into a different historical time frame on the long term trend, which all presidents are subject to.