2
   

There's no radical left in America.

 
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 02:54 am
How do you measure deterioration, instigate? Is it based on perceptions of someone's political philosophy that may not coincide with yours?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 03:31 am
okie said
Quote:
And blatham, I think you asked what the federal govenment is mandated to do? I think not much more than defense of the country, protections of our basic rights as guaranteed in the constitution, throw in international commerce, trade, and a few things like that. What else do you need to know?


Thank you, though I did request reference to philosophical or legal grounding in the constitution or the framer's writings. You mention international commerce and trade (I assume you mean support for it). Where, in the constitution or the framer's writings, do you find mandate for this duty of government?
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 03:35 am
How do you measure deterioration, instigate? Is it based on perceptions of someone's political philosophy that may not coincide with yours?
0 Replies
 
Instigate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 03:59 am
Mortkat wrote:
How do you measure deterioration, instigate? Is it based on perceptions of someone's political philosophy that may not coincide with yours?


Yep.

I measure deterioration by how far one strays from the concept of Liberty.

The current politcos on the right and left are all guilty.

Leftists would seize our guns and spike our taxes to pay for their futile feel good programs. They would abolish basic human liberties in favor of egalitarianism. This aint no fuckin Beehive. They have their own false notions of "equality"and they would have it dictated and enforced by the state. They're authoritarians at heart, and all the while they hold themselves as Defenders of Freedom and Beacons of Truth; Its a farce, a cover for their own Will To Power. It all boils down to the State with a leftist, and I am an anti-statist.

The rightist arent much better, but some of them still pay homage to the founding ideals of this country.However, the current rulers would have us believe that imposing western ideals on reluctant people(Iraq and all the death and destruction and monetary cost associated with such an endeavor) is a good thing. It is clear that Muslims do not value "Freedom and Democracy" like The West does, and I have a serious problem with imposing such upon them. Its not because i'm a "multiculturalist", i'm not, Its because I think it is arrogant and unrealistic to suppose that The U.S can transform a vigorous and widespread subsection of humanity. And The Pricks spend tax money like it was their own. Bastards.

Instead of trying to raise others to our level, we should be charging ahead. **** em'. Instead of trying to conform to an egalitarian international standard(U.N), a world gov, we should recognize and abide the foundations of this country.
0 Replies
 
Instigate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 04:01 am
has it always been censored like that?
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 04:02 am
You may be right with your take on the leftists!!!
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 04:27 am
blatham wrote:

Thank you, though I did request reference to philosophical or legal grounding in the constitution or the framer's writings. You mention international commerce and trade (I assume you mean support for it). Where, in the constitution or the framer's writings, do you find mandate for this duty of government?


Okay, I'll make a stab at it. Most notably in Article I Section 8 there is this sentence: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

I'll include in the following what I think contains most of what we were discussing:

Article I Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.


Also to better define, here is:

Article I, Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.


And this:
Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 06:07 am
okie wrote:
blatham wrote:

Thank you, though I did request reference to philosophical or legal grounding in the constitution or the framer's writings. You mention international commerce and trade (I assume you mean support for it). Where, in the constitution or the framer's writings, do you find mandate for this duty of government?


Okay, I'll make a stab at it. Most notably in Article I Section 8 there is this sentence: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

I'll include in the following what I think contains most of what we were discussing:

Article I Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.


Also to better define, here is:

Article I, Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.


And this:
Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.


You get a passing grade.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 06:58 am
roverroad wrote:
If someone said to you, there is no radical left in the United States, only a radical right and a large center. How would you defend or rebut that statement?

Because the terms 'left' and 'right' are both relative as well as time-dependent, such a statement is inherently undefensible and unrebuttable.

(In other words: bookmark.)
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 07:28 am
Let me back up the claim I just made by "proving" the opposite of the claims you offered -- a claim that most people in this thread would find ridiculous. That claim would be as follows: Since the 1920s, socialists won their culture war against liberals and conservative. Therefore, the only ideology that prevails today is socialism, and Reagan and the Bushs have only recently began to make a few shy attempts to introduce some liberalism in the policies of your nation.

As the timeframe in Roverroad's original post was "since the twenties", I will prove the claim by taking a page out of Rose and Milton Friedman's book Free to Choose (1980). The Friedmans reprint the 1928 platform plank of the Socialist Party and compare its demands with the status quo of 1979. Somebody has webbed this passage, so here is a cut&paste.

Rose and Milton Friedman (1980), comparing the Socialist platform plank of 1928 to their present status quo, wrote:
Herewith the economic planks of the Socialist party platform of 1928, along with an indication in parenthesis of how these planks have fared. The list that follows includes every economic plank, but not the full language of each.)1

1. "Nationalization of our natural resources, beginning with the coal mines and water sites, particularly at Boulder Dam and Muscle Shoals." (Boulder Dam, renamed Hoover Dam, and Muscle Shoals are now both federal government projects.)
2. "A publicly owned giant power system under which the federal government shall cooperate with the states and municipalities in the distribution of electrical energy to the people at cost." (Tennessee Valley Authority.)
3. "National ownership and democratic management of railroads and other means of transportation and communication." (Railroad passenger service is completely nationalized through Amtrak. Some freight service is nationalized through Conrail. The FCC controls communications by telephone, telegraph, radio, and television.)
4. "An adequate national program for flood control, flood relief, reforestation, irrigation, and reclamation." (Government expenditures for these purposes are currently in the many [non-adjusted] billions of dollars.)
5. "Immediate government relief of the unemployed by the extension of all public works and a program of long range planning of public works ..." (In the 1930s, WPA and PWA were a direct counterpart; now, a wide variety of other programs are.) "All persons thus employed to be engaged at hours and wages fixed by bona-fide labor unions." (The Davis-Bacon and Walsh-Healey Acts required contractors with government contracts to pay "prevailing wages," generally interpreted as highest union wages.)
6. "Loans to states and municipalities without interest for the purpose of carrying on public works and the taking of such other measures as will lessen widespread misery." (Federal grants in aid to states and local municipalities currently total [non-adjusted] tens of billions of dollars a year.)
7. "A system of unemployment insurance." (Part of Social Security system)
8. "The nation-wide extension of public employment agencies in cooperation with city federations of labor." (U.S. Employment Service and affiliated state employment services administer a network of about 2,500 [in 1980] local employment offices.)
9. "A system of health and accident insurance and of old age pensions as well as unemployment insurance." (Part of Social Security system.)
10. "Shortening the workday" and "Securing to every worker a rest period of no less than two days in each week." (Legislated by wages and hours laws that require overtime for more than forty hours of work per week.)
11. "Enacting of an adequate federal anti-child labor amendment." (Not achieved as amendment, but essence incorporated in various legislative acts.)
12. "Abolition of the brutal exploitation of convicts under the contract system and substitution of a cooperative organization of industries in penitentiaries and workshops for the benefit of convicts and their dependents." (Party achieved, partly not.)
13. "Increase of taxation on high income levels, of corporation taxes and inheritance taxes, the proceeds to be used for old age pensions and other forms of social insurance." (In 1928, highest personal income tax rate, 25 percent; in 1978, 70 percent; in 1928, corporate tax rate, 12 percent; in 1978, 48 percent; in 1928, top federal estate tax rate, 20 percent; in 1978, 70 percent.)
14. "Appropriation by taxation of the annual rental value of all land held for speculation." (Not achieved in this form, but property taxes have risen drastically.)


Source

From this comparison, it "follows" that there is no radical right in America. There is no moderate right and no center in America either. There are only different shades of socialism.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 08:56 am
Thomas wrote:
From this comparison, it "follows" that there is no radical right in America. There is no moderate right and no center in America either. There are only different shades of socialism.

Hurrah for creeping Socialism!

I would add some caveats, however, to the Friedmans' tribute to the triumphant march of Socialism:

Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:
1. "Nationalization of our natural resources, beginning with the coal mines and water sites, particularly at Boulder Dam and Muscle Shoals." (Boulder Dam, renamed Hoover Dam, and Muscle Shoals are now both federal government projects.)

A statement like this makes me doubt the veracity of everything that follows. If this is indeed taken from the Socialist Party platform of 1928, then the Socialists were not only progressive, they were prescient as well.

Work on the Boulder Dam was not begun until 1931, although the project received initial congressional approval in December, 1928 (too late, however, for the 1928 election and the party platforms for that election). There was, consequently, no Boulder Dam to nationalize in 1928 (the dam at Muscle Shoals, on the other hand, was completed in 1925).

Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:
2. "A publicly owned giant power system under which the federal government shall cooperate with the states and municipalities in the distribution of electrical energy to the people at cost." (Tennessee Valley Authority.)

I'm sure that the Socialists didn't have the TVA in mind when they advocated public ownership of the power system. The TVA is massive, to be sure, but it is only a small part of the national power system.

Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:
3. "National ownership and democratic management of railroads and other means of transportation and communication." (Railroad passenger service is completely nationalized through Amtrak. Some freight service is nationalized through Conrail. The FCC controls communications by telephone, telegraph, radio, and television.)

While Amtrak is a public corporation funded, in large part, by the government, it is hardly an example of the "democratic management" that was undoubtedly envisioned by the Socialists.

Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:
7. "A system of unemployment insurance." (Part of Social Security system)

Social security has no element of unemployment insurance whatsoever. All of the states, on the other hand, have unemployment insurance schemes.

Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:
12. "Abolition of the brutal exploitation of convicts under the contract system and substitution of a cooperative organization of industries in penitentiaries and workshops for the benefit of convicts and their dependents." (Party achieved, partly not.)

Mostly achieved through the elimination of convict labor entirely.

Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:
14. "Appropriation by taxation of the annual rental value of all land held for speculation." (Not achieved in this form, but property taxes have risen drastically.)

"Not achieved in this form" is, in this context, rather misleading. This plank, in effect, advocates the expropriation of all profits from land "held for speculation" (presumably, all land not worked by a landowner). That is a distant cry from an increase in property taxes (which affect all land, not just that held for speculation).
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 10:40 am
Mortkat
Mortkat, you have demonstrated your only real talent, which is disrupting and sidetracking thread topics with which you disagree. You also have a talent for redirecting threads to focus on you. What an ego you have.

Do recognize yourself in the following?

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

Diagnostic Criteria

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love

believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

requires excessive admiration

has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes


Take a good look Mortkat and give us a break.

BBB
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 10:46 am
Wow! You have described Setanta to a T! I always wondered which personality disorder he had.

Thanks for sharing BBB!
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 12:07 pm
joefromchicago wrote:
Hurrah for creeping Socialism!


At least one honest lib here on this forum.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 12:09 pm
Okie
okie wrote:
joefromchicago wrote:
Hurrah for creeping Socialism!

At least one honest lib here on this forum.


The only active socialism in the US is Corporate Socialism, or hadn't you noticed?

BBB
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 01:08 pm
okie wrote:
joefromchicago wrote:
Hurrah for creeping Socialism!


At least one honest lib here on this forum.

Who is it? I'll bet it's Blatham, right?
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 03:19 pm
Re: Okie
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:

The only active socialism in the US is Corporate Socialism, or hadn't you noticed?

BBB


Yep, Corporations, the only active socialists. Thats a real learned statement. I don't know how I haven't figured that out up to this point? Now if a socialist corporation does not build a refinery to process oil into gasoline so you can have gas to put in your car, I'm curious who you would like to do it? Some rich guy on his own? I doubt you would like that. But how could I guess, maybe you would love it if the government did it? Old Chavez down in Venezuela has it figured out doesn't he? But at least if we have a few socialist corporations competing against each other, I figure thats better than one socialist government wherein we would have no choice whatsoever.
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 03:27 pm
BB- If you would stop just posting idiotic cut and pastes and try to defend your ideas using some quotes with your comments on the side, you would be better served. Your list concerning my "disorders" is interesting but predictable. I have found that when the attacks on me, based on nothing but rancor at my posts, reach a screaming frenzy, I know that I am succeeding.

As George Bernard Shaw once said when he was pilloried by an especially rude harridan:

My dear lady, it is astonishing that you are able to describe me. You have known me but a short while while I have had my entire life to examine the totality of my personality.

Nice try, BBB but, no cigar.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 09:47 am
Mortkat
Mortkat wrote:
BB- If you would stop just posting idiotic cut and pastes and try to defend your ideas using some quotes with your comments on the side, you would be better served. Your list concerning my "disorders" is interesting but predictable. I have found that when the attacks on me, based on nothing but rancor at my posts, reach a screaming frenzy, I know that I am succeeding.

As George Bernard Shaw once said when he was pilloried by an especially rude harridan:

My dear lady, it is astonishing that you are able to describe me. You have known me but a short while while I have had my entire life to examine the totality of my personality.

Nice try, BBB but, no cigar.


I usually don't respond to A2K posters whose main activity is verbal gladiator sport just to raise hell. However, your statement is so dishonest and hypocritical that it cries out for a response.

There are few posters on A2K as you in negatively judging other poster's intelligence, experience, knowledge, etc. than you. Apparently, you know some posters from Abuzz, on which I did not participate. According to those who know you, your main contribution to Abuzz was to help destroy it. You will not succeed with your same goal on A2K.

For your information, I'm not your dear lady. I'm neither dear nor am I a lady. I'm a woman who laughs at your pompous pretentions.

BBB
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 11:28 am
Re: Okie
okie wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:

The only active socialism in the US is Corporate Socialism, or hadn't you noticed?

BBB


Yep, Corporations, the only active socialists. Thats a real learned statement. I don't know how I haven't figured that out up to this point? Now if a socialist corporation does not build a refinery to process oil into gasoline so you can have gas to put in your car, I'm curious who you would like to do it? Some rich guy on his own? I doubt you would like that. But how could I guess, maybe you would love it if the government did it? Old Chavez down in Venezuela has it figured out doesn't he? But at least if we have a few socialist corporations competing against each other, I figure thats better than one socialist government wherein we would have no choice whatsoever.

Thanks again for proving there is no real left in the Congress of the US. There is NO ONE in congress that is proposing the elimination of corporations and the complete ownership of all forms of production by govt.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/01/2025 at 01:26:45