Thomas wrote:From this comparison, it "follows" that there is no radical right in America. There is no moderate right and no center in America either. There are only different shades of socialism.
Hurrah for creeping Socialism!
I would add some caveats, however, to the Friedmans' tribute to the triumphant march of Socialism:
Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:1. "Nationalization of our natural resources, beginning with the coal mines and water sites, particularly at Boulder Dam and Muscle Shoals." (Boulder Dam, renamed Hoover Dam, and Muscle Shoals are now both federal government projects.)
A statement like this makes me doubt the veracity of everything that follows. If this is indeed taken from the Socialist Party platform of 1928, then the Socialists were not only progressive, they were prescient as well.
Work on the Boulder Dam was not begun until 1931, although the project received initial congressional approval in December, 1928 (too late, however, for the 1928 election and the party platforms for that election). There was, consequently, no Boulder Dam to nationalize in 1928 (the dam at Muscle Shoals, on the other hand, was completed in 1925).
Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:2. "A publicly owned giant power system under which the federal government shall cooperate with the states and municipalities in the distribution of electrical energy to the people at cost." (Tennessee Valley Authority.)
I'm sure that the Socialists didn't have the TVA in mind when they advocated public ownership of the power system. The TVA is massive, to be sure, but it is only a small part of the national power system.
Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:3. "National ownership and democratic management of railroads and other means of transportation and communication." (Railroad passenger service is completely nationalized through Amtrak. Some freight service is nationalized through Conrail. The FCC controls communications by telephone, telegraph, radio, and television.)
While Amtrak is a public corporation funded, in large part, by the government, it is hardly an example of the "democratic management" that was undoubtedly envisioned by the Socialists.
Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:7. "A system of unemployment insurance." (Part of Social Security system)
Social security has no element of unemployment insurance whatsoever. All of the states, on the other hand, have unemployment insurance schemes.
Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:12. "Abolition of the brutal exploitation of convicts under the contract system and substitution of a cooperative organization of industries in penitentiaries and workshops for the benefit of convicts and their dependents." (Party achieved, partly not.)
Mostly achieved through the elimination of convict labor entirely.
Rose and Milton Friedman wrote:14. "Appropriation by taxation of the annual rental value of all land held for speculation." (Not achieved in this form, but property taxes have risen drastically.)
"Not achieved in this form" is, in this context, rather misleading. This plank, in effect, advocates the expropriation of all profits from land "held for speculation" (presumably, all land not worked by a landowner). That is a distant cry from an increase in property taxes (which affect all land, not just that held for speculation).