Perception - at MIT Professor Chomsky teaches courses on AI (artificial intelligence) and not anything relating to politics; bibliography he lists for his department contains only books on linguistics:
http://web.mit.edu/linguistics/www/bibliography/noam.html
Hadn't realized he was a fan of Bakunin or of Pannekoek (hope spelled that right, hadn't heard of him before) but one thing still remember from his class is this example of difference in the way humans and computers process language:
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Ask any number of people and computers "Which is the word that all educated people spell incorrectly?" None of the humans ever guesses the answer but all computers instantly come up with the right word: "incorrectly". They're more literal-minded than we are.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
His work has significant applications in signal processing and encryption, in addition to linguistics. Read the interview posted by Blatham, btw, and really think Chomsky focuses on the lack of clear explanation for the Iraq attack - or rather on the sequence of partial explanations - and not on politics or military strategy. I'm kind of literal-minded myself, though <G>