0
   

The US, UN & Iraq III

 
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 04:55 pm
perception wrote:
Just one last comment as I ride off into the sunset with the rest of the posse-----Tartarin this is for you----when you climb onto your broom do you check to see if you have a drivers licence or a pilots licence? Laughing

Should this be tolerated?
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 04:57 pm
It has been in the past, this is a constant repeat of past performances. To have a successful site there has to be openness, and when you are open certain undesireables creep in!!!!!
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:00 pm
When they address your lie Hobit----then we'll talk about my comments to Tartarin.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:04 pm
It's okay, Hobit. Perc does this all the time. I think he has an (ahem) woman complex!!
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:05 pm
If he didn't, he help along the discussion in the spin-off thread.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:14 pm
a clean sweep is often advisable with or without license.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:14 pm
BillW

Please check your wings---I may have just damaged them----I thought you were a mosquito.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:21 pm
a common concept in sociology is referred to as "airplane analysis" whereby someone makes an observation from 45,000 feet and thinks they have a closeup view. they are usually wrong.
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:27 pm
Quote:
U.S. opposes suit by ex-hostages in Iraq
By JONATHAN D. SALANT
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is opposing efforts by hundreds of Americans held by Saddam Hussein before the first Gulf War to collect damages that would be paid from frozen Iraqi assets.
The administration did not oppose a different group of 179 former hostages and their spouses who sued and were awarded $94 million in damages from the $1.7 billion in frozen assets, but that was before a U.S.-led coalition ousted Saddam earlier this year.
With Saddam now gone, the Justice Department on Monday has asked a federal judge in Washington to dismiss a second suit from 210 former hostages. A hearing is scheduled for Sept. 4.
The hostages' lawyer, Daniel Wolf, said the government is trying to change the rules in the middle of the game. The first suit was filed in 1999; the second in 2001.
"Right now, the battle is about whether these victims of Iraqi terrorism get to have their day in court," Wolf said Tuesday.
Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo declined to comment beyond the court filings.
Hundreds of Americans working in Iraq were held as hostages by Saddam after Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. They were deployed as human shields at key installations to deter attacks. All released before the start of the Persian Gulf War.
In its court filing, the government claims that legislation allowing American victims of state-sponsored terrorism to sue for damages no longer applies to Iraq. The court filings say President Bush, using powers granted by Congress when it passed the supplemental spending bill for the second Gulf War, exempted Iraq from such laws.
"Now that the oppressive regime of Saddam Hussein has been removed from power, that provisions of law that had previously applied to Iraq only because of its support for terrorism must no longer apply," the Justice Department told the court.
The Justice Department filings, sent to the court on Monday, said granting Iraq immunity from terrorism lawsuits would prevent the new government from "becoming hobbled with liability judgments arising from the Hussein dictatorship."
The Bush administration last month successfully defeated efforts by 17 former Persian Gulf War prisoners of war to collect $653 million in damages from frozen Iraqi assets. Government lawyers argued that Bush had the authority to decide how the frozen assets should be spent and believes they should go toward rebuilding Iraq.*

http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/iraq/6623881.htm


*Toward Halliburton?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:29 pm
Didn't you guys realise? Iraq will now be described as "A wholly owned subsidiary of the United States of America, Inc. "
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:32 pm
as the Very Reverend Ike used to say "the lack of money is the root of all evil" so when it comes to The Bush, send cash, checks or money orders, he dont pay out he only collects.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:36 pm
Oh, for crying out loud! I'm tired of this childish behavior from so many of you. I dislike and distrust true believers of any and all ilk, and too many of you are exhibiting a rigid, myopic, prejudicial, nasty attitudinal view. What makes it worse, you are translating that into words!

I realize that I am not a main player in this discussion and that is fine with me. But I am egotistical enough to be annoyed when I am ignored.

I put forth what I consider to be an interesting and seminal question, and not one person has responded to it. If my perception of the question is wrong, somebody please tell me that I am a know nothing and do not warrant attention. Otherwise, I place my question before you again:

"I have a question. Given the dominance of faith in Iraqi life (or is that an incorrect assumption on my part?), what would happen if an Iraqi leader or politician came onto the scene and said that given our differences, we must adopt a model with a strict separation of church and state? What is the likelihood that such an individual would, or could, rise to the top? What if he or she actively campaigned on this issue? What might be the outcome?"
0 Replies
 
Tartarin
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:37 pm
Here's what I like: Bush is getting MORE and MORE people MADDER and MADDER at him! That's nice, isn't it!
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:42 pm
sumac wrote:
Oh, for crying out loud! I'm tired of this childish behavior from so many of you. I dislike and distrust true believers of any and all ilk, and too many of you are exhibiting a rigid, myopic, prejudicial, nasty attitude view. What makes it worse, you are translating that into words!

I realize that I am not a main player in this discussion and that is fine with me. But I am egotistical enough to be annoyed when I am ignored.

I put forth what I consider to be an interesting and seminal question, and not one person has responded to it. If my perception of the question is wrong, somebody please tell me that I am a know nothing and do not warrant attention. Otherwise, I place my question before you again:

"I have a question. Given the dominance of faith in Iraqi life (or is that an incorrect assumption on my part?), what would happen if an Iraqi leader or politician came onto the scene and said that given our differences, we must adopt a model with a strict separate of church and state? What is the likelihood that such an individual would, or could, rise to the top? What if he or she actively campaigned on this issue? What might be the outcome?"

Well, I addressed it in between another person's tirades. The assumption that religion plays such an important role in the ME is false. Secular governments exist (or have existed) in Iran (destroyed by the CIA and MI6 in 1956 (or 1958, not sure) , Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, Afghanistan (before the Soviet invasion), Pakistan (before 1978), and Iraq (before the Ba'ath coup, adn even under Hussein, but the support issue is not there for the Hussein regime). Does this help? Read Noah Feldman's book After Jihad: America and the Struggle for ISlamic Democracy.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:47 pm
Yes, hobitbob, I did see your original response. But what of the balance of my question. What if someone tried to take religion out of Iraqi politics? Is it possible, now?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 05:55 pm
I haven't seen any indication that religion is central to Iraqi politics. It is being used as a point of rhetoric for Iraqi nationalism, but the lack of popularity for the bands of Shi'ite "thugs (for lack of a better word)" who have taken it on themselves to interepret the law and attempted to enforce it (many of these people were students at Madrasa immediately prior to the invasion, and so it is rather like having first year law students decide they are going to become the sole court system) leads one to doubt the popularity of a fiercely Islamic regime appearing in Iraq. The only selling point the fundies have at the moment is their willingness to
a) pay out of work military folks.
b) employ said former soldier types into a private militia.
So, if the US is able to establish security in Iraq, instead of wh-cking off over the oil, the sole appealing aspect of the fundamentalist groups will dissapear. The fundies offer a security no one is really happy with. the US could offer a security everyone would be happy with. Does that answer your question? There really isn't an "easy" answer.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 06:09 pm
Sumac.
I doubt it. Religion is much too powerful a force in Moslem society. I would think assassination is more likely than success.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 06:33 pm
Bush 8/26/03
Quote:
Afghanistan today is a friend of the United States of America. Because we acted, that country is not a haven for terrorists, and the people of America are safer from attack

Guradian KABUL,
Quote:
Afghanistan (AP) - US and Afghan forces clashed with suspected Taliban in the mountains of southeastern Afghanistan on Tuesday, a day after fighter jets bombarded a camp and killed at least 14 rebels, Afghan officials said.
Quote:
LIBERIA'S rebels have pushed down a major highway towards the capital Monrovia, aid workers said yesterday as thousands of civilians fled the latest clashes, casting doubt on an increasingly rocky peace deal

Helicopter gunships struck yet again in Gaza on Tuesday, but this time they missed their target. Regardless, the two gunships missed, destroying a car and killing instead a local resident with no links to any Palestinian group. Twenty others were also hurt, including several children.
Quote:
UN officials say traces of enriched uranium have been found at an Iranian nuclear plant, but they're still uncertain if Iran is developing nuclear weapons.

INDIA yesterday blamed Islamic militant groups for twin car bombings in Mumbai which killed 50 people and left 154 wounded in the worst terrorist attack in a decade in the country's financial heart.
Do you feel safer? Is the world a better place because Bush invaded Iraq? Inquiring minds want to know. Well, I dont mean Fox News wants to know.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 07:05 pm
au1929 wrote:
Sumac.
I doubt it. Religion is much too powerful a force in Moslem society. I would think assassination is more likely than success.

I would have to disagree with you, there Au (I'm playing the "Arab" card here Wink ) . The Iraqis got quite used to a secular society, where Alcohol, short skirts, and fun were availble (if limited). The same was true of Lebanon before the 1980s, Afghanistan before 1978, etc...Even in modern day Iran there are strong pulls toward a secular society, with undergroud culture developing. Unfortunately, Iran has also acquired the "down side" of secualr society: A huge IVDA problem, growing HIV rates (Although the government deinies that AIDS is in Iran) , and thriving markets for prostituion of both sexes, and a relatively accomplished porn industry! In fact, the success of the Islamic revolution in Iran was likely due to the brief chaos that occured after the Shah left. Khomeini and co. assumed power when there was no one atound to stop them. Once people realized what had occurred, it was too late to do anything about it. It would be a pity if that were to happen in Iraq. Mad
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Tue 26 Aug, 2003 07:24 pm
I'm days behind here and it looks like I've missed the fireworks.

Setanta began:....
Quote:
Among the ancient nomads of the Arabian peninsula, long before Mohammed and Islam, there was a custom known as the sunna. This can be thought of as a modus vivendi, a means of living together, or getting along. These fierce, proud, tribal warriors were contemptuous of the pacific inhabitants of oases, towns and seaports--but those people had the trade goods the desert nomads wanted


You have given an erudite posting of what I read popularly written in Karen Armstrong's History of God. The history of Islam is fascinating. Hobitbob points out above that Armstrong's book about fundamentalism, The Battle for God, attests that those who feel threatened by modernist changes in a traditional faith seek to go back to the beginning and recreate the old beliefs and dogmas in a strict and rigid way. As simplistic as they may be, her books (or tapes) are a good way to get a feeling for what most of us never had any chance or encouragement to study: the various religious traditions of the world.

Tartarin, what a great quote from from Barbara Tuchman, in The March of Folly.

Sumac wrote:

Quote:
"I have a question. Given the dominance of faith in Iraqi life (or is that an incorrect assumption on my part?), what would happen if an Iraqi leader or politician came onto the scene and said that given our differences, we must adopt a model with a strict separation of church and state? What is the likelihood that such an individual would, or could, rise to the top? What if he or she actively campaigned on this issue? What might be the outcome?"


This is an issue of great interest to me. I have read only small pieces on it and a very few hopeful items. There was a cleric of the church-state-separation belief who came to Iraq from a religious school in Iran. The belief that Islam and democracy can live comfortably together is held by his school/group in Iran, although this is not an idea that raises its head high at the current moment in Iran. He has hopes of establishing just that idea in Iraq and is there trying to gain followers. I read only one story on this and have seen no follow up. I have read often what hobitbob says about Iraq being very secular, probably due to the influence of Sunni Islam, and one hopes that enough order will be established in Iraq (although that seems increasingly unlikely) that free discussions, as well as frank debate and dissent, will be heard.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The US, UN & Iraq III
  3. » Page 230
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 08:30:37