0
   

The US, UN & Iraq III

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 03:33 pm
Quote:
Poll: Americans Think U.S. Bogged in Iraq
Sat Aug 23, 3:18 PM ET


WASHINGTON - With public confidence declining in President Bush (news - web sites)'s handling of the war in Iraq (news - web sites), nearly 70 percent of Americans feel the United States will be bogged down in the country for years without achieving its goals, a poll finds.


The Newsweek poll released Saturday also found that nearly 6 of 10 people are concerned that the U.S. military will be overextended should another security threat arise outside Iraq. And 7 of 10 are concerned the costs of the war will increase the deficit and hurt the economy.


The war costs the United States roughly $1 billion per week.

The poll of 1,011 adults was taken Thursday and Friday, just after last week's suicide truck bombing at the United Nations (news - web sites) headquarters in Baghdad that killed the top U.N. envoy there and at least 22 others.


U.S. and British troops have also been targets of guerrilla attacks. Military figures show that 135 U.S. soldiers have died in Iraq since May 1, when President Bush declared the end of major combat operations there.


Americans had mixed feelings over how to proceed. About 48 percent said the United States should withdraw military personnel because of the attacks, while 47 percent said the soldiers should stay.


About 61 percent said the United States did the right thing in taking military action, down 7 percent from a poll taken in late July.


And 72 percent say they would support turning over some authority for rebuilding Iraq to the United Nations. France, Russia, India and other countries have ruled out sending soldiers to Iraq unless a multinational force is authorized by the United Nations.


The poll found that 54 percent approved of Bush's handling of the Iraqi situation, down from 58 percent in late July.


And for the first time in a Newsweek poll, the percentage of registered voters who would not like to see Bush re-elected as president outnumbered those who supported a second term (49 percent to 44 percent).


The poll had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030823/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_iraq_poll
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 03:45 pm
The Bush administration is encountering resistance to a new U.N. Security Council resolution to encourage additional countries to send troops to Iraq, officials said Monday. U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan said on Friday the United Nations could not send a peacekeeping force to Iraq but added that he could not exclude a council decision "to transform the operation into a U.N.-mandated multinational force operating on the ground with other governments coming in."
Powell has made clear that Washington won't cede any of its decision-making powers in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:07 pm
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:14 pm
Quote:
We may fail because to win The Big One, we need an American public, and allies, ready to pay any price and bear any burden, but we have a president unable or unwilling to summon either.
Just perhaps had the Bush been honest from the gitgo he would have the support of the public. Way too many lies and distortions sour the pot.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:14 pm
If your memories can manage it think about the wailing during the war----one day we were bogged down and everything was going wrong----the next day the buzz was----damn what a brilliant plan
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:22 pm
Stop baiting each other, please.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:26 pm
Damn sumac, you're good, and you're hired Smile Next job - Israel/Palestinian referee - please Wink
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:32 pm
Sumac

This is absolutely civil compared to yesterday and the day before and......................................

Please feel invited to join in and I promise you will receive only encouragement from me but I would not dare to speak for the others especially those flying around on brooms.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 04:53 pm
Bogged down, are you kidding? We have them right where they want us! Confused Go USA, Sig HEil, etc...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 05:05 pm
A Dear John to a marine in Afghanistan. c.i.
*************************************
A Marine stationed in Afghanistan recently received a "Dear John" letter from his girlfriend back home. It read as follows:

Dear Ricky, I can no longer continue our relationship. The distance betweenus is just too great. I must admit that I have cheated on you twice, since you've been gone, and it's not fair to either of us. I'm sorry. Please return the picture of me that I sent to you.

Love,

Becky


The Marine, with hurt feelings, asked his fellow Marines for any snapshots they could spare of their girlfriends, sisters, ex-girlfriends, aunts,
cousins etc. In addition to the picture of Becky, Ricky included all the other pictures of the pretty gals he had collected from his buddies.
There were 57 photos in that envelope....along with this note:

Dear Becky, I'm so sorry, but I can't quite remember who you are. Please take your picture from the pile, and send the rest back to me.

Take care.

Ricky
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 05:20 pm
C.I.

Five gold stars------ Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 05:36 pm
Friedman said--
Quote:
If you succeed here, Iraq could change the habits and customs of the people in the whole area."

Precisely.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 06:01 pm
Lest we forget. c.i.
*******************

Good reading for every one of us! I sat in my seat of the Boeing 767 waiting for everyone to hurry and stow their carry on and grab a seat so we could start what I was sure to be a long and uneventful flight home. With the huge capacity andslow moving people taking their time to stuff luggage far too big for the overhead and never paying muchattention to holding up the growing line behind them, I simply shook my head knowing that this flight was not starting out very well and although I had a great bunch of meetings while conducting business on this trip, it was quickly becoming tarnished with these delays in my getting home to my loved one whom I had not seen in several days.

The meetings although fruitful were long and I had not slept well, not to mention those blasted new dress shoes that rubbed a blister on my heel. I was pretty focused on "my" issues and just felt like standing up and yelling for some of these clowns to get their act together and focus on taking their seats. Knowing I couldn't say anything that would really help,
I just thumbed thru the sky mall widget magazine from the seat pocket in front of me. You know it's really getting rough when you resort to the over priced and mostly useless sky mall crap to break the monotony and
inconvenience of the trouble "I" was going thru. With everyone finally on board and seated, we just sat there with the cabin door open and seemingly no one in any hurry to get us going even though we were well past our scheduled take off time. The paper work had not yet come in to the flight deck, the attendants just stood around talking.

No wonder the airline industry is in trouble I told myself. Don't they realize we have some place we are supposed to be? We should be treated with more importance, after all we are the customers, right? Just
then, the attendant came on the intercom to inform us all "that we were being delayed"...as she paused, the entire plane let out a collective groan.

She resumed her announcement, 'we are holding the aircraft for some very special people who are on their way to the plane and that the delay should not be more than five more minutes. Their connecting flight had traveled a long way and we would get underway just as soon as possible."

Now, I have had this happen to me before and more often than not, I had to catch the next flight or even go to another carrier to get to my destination. Still,I was grateful for the times when they waited for me, so I thought that I would go back to my sky mall pages and try to forget
just how much "I" was being inconvenienced.

As the word came from a scrambling attendant down theconnecting tunnel to the main cabin door I thought that maybe she had some information that would let us know why we had been sitting there for over 30 minutes!! Had someone finally given word that after waiting six times as long as we were first promised that "I" was finally going to be on my way home? Why the hoopla over when these folks? Just get their butts in a seat and lets hit the gas, I thought to myself.

After a few minutes we were all "locked on" when the attendant came back on the speaker, semi expecting some celebrity or sport figure to be announced as the reason the aircraft was delayed so long. I thought who cares, let's go! She announced in a loud and excited voice that we were being joined by several United States Marines returning home from Iraq!!!!
Just as they walked onboard the entire plane erupted into applause. The Men were a bit taken by the surprise of the 340+ people cheering for them as they searched for their seats. It didn't stop, they were having their hands shook and touched by almost everyone who was within an arm's distance of them as they tried to push thru the aisles. Whistles, cheering, an occasional"oorrahh", one elderly woman kissed the hand of one of the Marines as he passed by her, and the applause didn't stop for a long time as they continued toward the back of the aircraft.

When we finally got air born I am sure I was not the only civilian checking his conscious as to the "delays" in me getting home from my "hard business meetings", finding my easy chair and remote, a cold beverage, and tending to my blister". In fact I felt pretty stupid as I am sure many did.
After what these Men had done for all of us, and I had been complaining silently about "me" and "my issues"?

It sure made me realize that as much as I told myself that I didn't take for granted some of the everyday freedoms I enjoy and the conveniences of the American way of life and that it sometimes seems like a personal attack on one of us when things don't go exactly right...I was doing exactly that. I was taking it for granted. I took it for granted when others who had really paid the price for my ability to moan and complain (even if it was just to myself)...let alone a few minutes delay to me so that those HEROES could go home to their loved ones.

I attempted to get my selfish outlook back in order and minutes before we landed I suggested to the attendant she announced over the speaker a request for everyone to remain in their seats until our Hero's were allowed to gather their things and be first off the plane. The cheers and applause cntinued until the last Marine stepped off and we all rose to go about our too often taken for granted everyday freedoms....I felt Proud of Them.
I felt it an Honor and a privilege to be among the first to welcome them home and say Thank You for a job well done.

I vowed that I will never forget that flight nor the lesson learned.
I have said it before but I can't say it enough, THANK YOU to those VETERANS and ACTIVE SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN who may read this, and I prayer everyday for those who cannot because they are no longer with us.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 06:49 pm
Very nice indeed, c.i.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 07:02 pm
Good for You C.I.----very relevant to this thread. We all need a bit of cheer these days -----thanks
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 10:03 pm
This is the first installment of passages from the book"Hatreds Kingdom" dealing with the formation and advancement of Wahhabism (which spawned bin Laden and most modern day terrorists) by the ruling family of Saudi Arabia. It is a particularly cruel and intollerant sect of Islam that seeks the conversion or destruction of all who don't subscribe to it's puritanical version of the word of the Prophet. You will see that it's hatred is aimed at not only Christians and Jews but also at Muslims who do not share the teachings of Wahhab.

My hope is that you all will see these passages as relevant to this thread because of the terrorism that is being unleashed on Iraq today


In the mid-1700s, Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab, a religious zealot, formed a branch of Islam that would be called Wahhabism. After quarreling with his father and the Emir of his tribe, Wahhab was expelled and he sought a new protector. In the end, Muhammad ibn Saud, the ruler of Diriyah, near Riyadh, gave him shelter. The two men struck an Alliance in 1744 and thus began the conquest of Islam by Wahhabism. At that time,what is now Saudi Arabia was merely a homeland for many Arab Tribes, one of which was the Sauds of Diriyah near what is now Riyadh.

Muhammad ibn Saud and Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab thus formed a covenant, under which ibn Saud established the first Saudi state and ibn Abdul Wahhab determined its official creed. In the West the new puritanical doctrine was named Wahhabism and its adherants were called Wahhabis.

With this political-religious alliance, tribal raiding could now be carried on as a religious cause. Ibn Abdul Wahhab legitimized jihad against fellow Muslims for the first time and thanks to his military Alliance with ibn Saud, he could duplicate the Muslim conquests of the seventh century. This allowed him to spread Wahhabism by the sword. Their enemies were offered a choice: embracing Wahhabism or death.
This was a departure from mainstream Islam.

In his Book of Tawbid, Wahhab advanced an extremely anti-Christian and anti-Jewish agenda, describing the followers of both religions as sorcerers who believed in devil worship and declared that the punishment for sorcerers is "that he be struck with the sword". This analysis and interpretation made Wahhabism far more INTOLLERANT of Christianity and Judaism and is a departure from mainstream Islam.

During the next 50 or so years Wahhabism conquered all of what is now Saudi Arabia and even made forays into southern Iraq. ( Continued)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 10:08 pm
perc, Keep em coming. Reading with interest. c.i.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 10:21 pm
Tomorrow---bed time for this old man.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 11:03 pm
Read Karen Armstrong's account of Wahabbism in "The Battle for God." She compares various forms of fundamentalism, Jewish, Christian and Muslim. the underlying theme is the rejection of "modernity" by groups that think of themselves as oppressed. Wahabbism (a branch of Sunni Islam) and its link to what was a minor family in the Ottoman Empire was a marriage of convenience. The control of the Hijaz by the Ottoman Sultanate was always weak, the Bedouin were not good subjects for rule (Very Happy ), and the struggle between ruling family groups was often quite violent. The al-Saud house, by the virtue of its control of Mecca, was among the stronger of the competing groups. A alliance with a new strain of Islam could only improve its hold on those who owed the clan fealty.
Of particular interest is the way the house of Saud played the British, French, Germans, Russians,and Ottomans off of each other through the 19th century. Similarly, during WWI the al-Sauds kept a running game of duplicity going with the Ottoman and Allied forces,and during WWII with both the allies and axis powers. Like any ruling family, the house of al-Saud has as its primary objective the maintenance of its power.
The danger lies in seeing the political aspirations of a ruling dynasty as more or less than they are. Similarly, to ascribe more importance in world affairs to one sect of radical religion is naive. Wahabbism grows becasue it has Saudi money behind it. The al-Saud support Wahhabism becasue it is a usefull tool for social control at home. In addition, they support activities aoutside the Arabian penninsula in order to present the image of benevolent guardian of Islam to the world community.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 25 Aug, 2003 11:08 pm
perception wrote:


. Ibn Abdul Wahhab legitimized jihad against fellow Muslims for the first time and thanks to his military Alliance with ibn Saud, he could duplicate the Muslim conquests of the seventh century. This allowed him to spread Wahhabism by the sword. Their enemies were offered a choice: embracing Wahhabism or death.
This was a departure from mainstream Islam.

In his Book of Tawbid, Wahhab advanced an extremely anti-Christian and anti-Jewish agenda, describing the followers of both religions as sorcerers who believed in devil worship and declared that the punishment for sorcerers is "that he be struck with the sword". This analysis and interpretation made Wahhabism far more INTOLLERANT of Christianity and Judaism and is a departure from mainstream Islam.


The important phrase mentioned above, and frequently overlooked in the current tenor of anti-Islamic propoganda, is "This was a departure from mainstream Islam." The majority of Muslims in the world are NOT Wahabbi. Judgening and condmning an entire religion on the basis of the actions of a minor sect is ridiculous. It is like condemning all of Christianity for the actions and teachings of the lonies who spawned McVeigh.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The US, UN & Iraq III
  3. » Page 225
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 6.74 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 06:13:13