dagmaraka wrote:I saw Atonement and it was OK. It didn't sweep me away (too artificial) but I'd still recommend it.
I saw it yesterday, dag, & was left with confused feelings about why I didn't find it more satisfying than I "should" have. I mean, all the right ingredients were there, right? So why didn't it quite work?
I thought about it a bit more & came to the conclusion that the original story (the wrongful accusation by Briony) became overwhelmed by the "futility of war" message of the Dunkirk part of the film. The "war" section of the film sort of took on a separate life of its own (& went on for far too long!) & distracted from the original story. (Very powerful it was, too!) For me, anyway, the two separate strands of the story were not successfully tied together to create a satisfactory whole. If it wasn't for the masterful performance of Vanessa Redgrave (at the very end of the film) I doubt the director could have pulled it off at all. She was fantastic! Utterly convincing as the aging Briony, she drew our attention back to the idea of
process of writing as a means of making sense of experience ... and in Briony's case, atoning for a terrible wrong by changing the "real" ending of the story to one that was (finally) sympathetic to those she had wronged.
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/movies/342550_atonement07q.html