Bush wanted to bomb Al-Jazeera

Ok. But if it's true, don't you think it brings into question whether the other two bombings were truly accidental?

f4f: It's clear you know how to post links and images. Will you please identify when you make block quotes such as the one you made above, and show the source for the quote? Thanks.

Ticomaya wrote:

f4f: It's clear you know how to post links and images. Will you please identify when you make block quotes such as the one you made above, and show the source for the quote? Thanks.

Wtf are you talking about tico, which block quotes ?

Who knows? But if his remarks were just an innocent piece of cretinism, then why in the name of holy thunder has the British state decreed that anyone printing those remarks will be sent to prison?

We all hope and pray that the American President was engaging in nothing more than neo-con Tourette-style babble about blowing things up. We are quite prepared to believe that the Daily Mirror is wrong. We are ready to accept that the two British civil servants who have leaked the account are either malicious or mistaken. But if there is one thing that would seem to confirm the essential accuracy of the story, it is that the Attorney General has announced that he will prosecute anyone printing the exact facts.

What are we supposed to think? The meeting between Bush and Blair took place on April 16, 2004, at the height of the US assault on Fallujah, and there is circumstantial evidence for believing that Bush may indeed have said what he is alleged to have said.

Still trying to discredit my sources, can you please start to defend Bush ? :wink:

I'll go to jail to print the truth about Bush and al-Jazeera

By Boris Johnson
(Filed: 24/11/2005)

Quote:

If someone passes me the document within the next few days I will be very happy to publish it in The Spectator, and risk a jail sentence. The public need to judge for themselves. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. If we suppress the truth, we forget what we are fighting for, and in an important respect we become as sick and as bad as our enemies....
Telegraph

Interesting.... please read the full article.

FreeDuck wrote:

Ok. But if it's true, don't you think it brings into question whether the other two bombings were truly accidental?

I think the mere mention of this will have that effect. Whether it's "true" or not is inconsequential.

Ticomaya wrote:

FreeDuck wrote:

Ok. But if it's true, don't you think it brings into question whether the other two bombings were truly accidental?

I think the mere mention of this will have that effect. Whether it's "true" or not is inconsequential.

Yeah, I was talking more specifically about you yourself. Would you question whether those other two bombings were truly accidental if this story were true, or do you already question it?

I don't think anyone is necessarily doubting the article Fedral. At least in my case, I just don't understand why any attention is being given to this story. It's not a big deal.

Walter Hinteler wrote:

I suppose, you certainly will advocate that all those who are in US jails just for talking about crimes will be freed as soon as poassible!

Examples por favor ?

Thats forward thinking. Just disreguard anything you dont want to hear

Ostriches and heads in sand come to mind.

Nice try, ora. Not them.

Shoot the messenger.