englishmajor wrote:No. YOU are clueless, American. Think you can follow this article? DO try:
You seem to have no words of your own.
englishmajor wrote:Published on Monday, May 10, 2004 by the Agence France Presse
Iraq-Vietnam Parallels Pile Up
WASHINGTON - While most people here still recoil from comparisons of Iraq and Vietnam...© Copyright 2004 AFP
*******
Oh yeah, you Yanks are really doing the Iraqis a favour. You would strap bombs on YOUR backs if they came into your country (which they did not, clueless amerikan.) Iraq had no WMD's and were not responsible for 9/11. THEREFORE, why are you there? OIL. You could care less about the people, and you know it.
Well, if you are going to simply tell me what my opinions are, then, of course, you can win every argument, but you are incorrect in every comment about my motivations. As to your comment that Iraq had no WMD, we know that for sure precisely because we invaded.
englishmajor wrote:If you Yanks are so humanitarian, why don't you go to Chad? Bingo! No oil there.
No, because there is no serious possibility in Chad of secret accumulation of WMD by a madman. This was Bush's repeatedly stated reason for invading Iraq.