Ah, more revelation of the intent of Barfikus--rhetorical questions with the intent to bring your interlocutors into disrepute.
On October 29th, i wrote, flippanly:
Setanta wrote:This goofy thread title wrote:
Atheists... Your life is pointless
That being the case, there's no reason to respond.
Subsequently, on November 7th, i wrote:
Quote:There is actually a very pathetic aspect to the thread title. By inference, it states that a theist's life is meaningful because of the theist's belief in a deity. It externalizes the individual's sense of self-worth, and worse, identifies it with their imaginary friend, whose existence cannot be demonstrated. All rather sad, really.
So, in fact, i've added my comments on this idiotic thread long, long ago. I rather suspect that you showed up somewhere between page 90 and page 100, didn't bother to read the thread, and just started flailing away with your personal imaginary friend superstition. My original reponse to this thread, on October 29th, was in response to its character as a "have you stopped beating your wife" conundrum. Basically, John Creasy showed up with an inferential demand that atheists prove that their lives have meaning, and an assumption that all devotees of the imaginary friend supestition have meaningful lives by definition.
Then you show up, don't bother to read the thread, pay little heed to either the title or its implications, and start spouting largely meaningless mumbo-jumbo which constitutes religious sound bytes--and so i characterize your "contributions" as drivel, and assert that you have contributed no cogent comment on the topic of this thread.
