@reasoning logic,
Quote:What is it that you think that they are in denial about?
That they exhibit the conditions they list if they are provoked in certain ways. Not getting a promotion they expected for example. Was that not obvious from what I said.
They work for a consideration you know. They have a target in the market. People who want to discover new conditions in others they hadn't thought of before in order to trot them out for the same reason I gave for them being written. Like a pyramid and the last in lose. And judging from your posts you are in the bottom segment of it.
Quote:Is it somewhat similar to how you and setanta agree?
I have some sympathy with Setanta. I have experienced something for which a military field hospital is the response. Once. That must have been day-in-day-out for Setanta. It wasn't emotional. It was intellectual. It puts an edge on the side you've already got. Particularly regarding the festering, fetid slurry tank which the bourgeois is.
Have you ever heard of Ambrose Bierce. He was in your Civil War and seems to have been affected in a similar, though more extreme, way.
It was what Henry Miller meant when he said that Tropic of Cancer was a gob of spit in the face of the human race. But 'ol Henry was a bit crude and forthright. Marcel Proust would not have chosen words like that. Kingsley Amis was about the mid-point between them.
I feel sure Setanta and I agree on many things but you have a facility to spot one of those things as a cat spots a mouse and you try to make as much of it.
You have HBIMCP. (Half baked intellectual management control problems.) And pretty bad too.
Mr Miller also said that he didn't do psychoanalysis for fear of the geek shitting himself.