92
   

Atheists... Your life is pointless

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 05:21 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Everything i wrote is implied in what you wrote: Satanism, the culmination of all evil. Everything you puke up when you start talking about atheists is sooner or later, and usually sooner rather than later, a nasty attack. You demonstrate time and again that you really don't get it when it comes to atheists, but that doesn't stop you from characterizing atheists in slighting and sometimes hateful and bigoted terms. You say you did not "resort to attacks from myself to you?" What the hell to you call it, then, when you describe atheists as satanists or the culmination of evilness.

You really need to stop posting until you learn to understand the implications of what you write. You really do slip the clutch slip on your mouth before the motor is even running in your brain. If that's insulting as far as you're concerned, then i say good--you're getting what you deserve.
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 05:32 am
@Setanta,
Quote:
Everything i wrote is implied in what you wrote: Satanism, the culmination of all evil. Everything you puke up when you start talking about atheists is sooner or later, and usually sooner rather than later, a nasty attack. You demonstrate time and again that you really don't get it when it comes to atheists, but that doesn't stop you from characterizing atheists in slighting and sometimes hateful and bigoted terms. You say you did not "resort to attacks from myself to you?" What the hell to you call it, then, when you describe atheists as satanists or the culmination of evilness.

I want to say one last thing before I go and then I am off...Since you keep repeating this to me...

If there is no such thing as the Devil, and there is no such truth to what
I have to say...and you do not believe any of it...My views have no merit...I do not know anything about atheism...my views are wrong...etc...

Why would it bother you or anyone else, or be nasty in any such way if none of this is real? Or if the Devil does not actually exist? Why would it matter if I made those claims? It does not correct? Then I can't be acting nasty or anything you had to say...Unless one believes it has truth to it...You do not believe what I say? You do not believe any of it, right? What does it matter then? 2 Cents Idea see ya later Set...always praying, and trying to help others...I do not wish to hurt anyone, and offend them in anyway...even though I know that I do...

g'moring...
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 05:36 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Because, Gomer, it's an example of injustice. It's an example of the bigotry which is commonly displayed toward atheists. It's utter bullshit that you cannot be nasty just because you are wrong--that's at the heart of bigotry, being wrong and being loud and pushy about it. Just because it's "your two cents," just because that's how you see it doesn't make it either defensible or any less bigoted. Why don't you just keep your nasty mouth of atheists for a change?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 05:45 am
@Setanta,
I could be wrong...but I don't think that that is truthful...I suspect that you do not even think that that is the actual whole truth...and I think that most people reading this do not think that that is the the whole truth either...

Believe what you want to...Reject what you want to...It is your life to live...make it whatever you want to make it...

I am gone now...enjoy your day...Poof...
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 05:49 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
I not only do think it's the actual truth, i know it is. I've seen you bad-mouth and denigrate atheists here for years. "Poof" to you, too.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 06:47 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5283035)
Quote:
He said he was not...and he talked about "his god" frequently.


He never when charge with being an atheist stated that he was not to my knowledge!!!!!!!!


THAT DOES NOT MAKE HIM AN ATHEIST.

Quote:
Second, all positive references to a god in his writings seems to be when he was acting in the position of wordsmith in the service of his new nation not when he was addressing his own believes or lack of same.


Nonsense. I have pointed out several personal comments of Jefferson that indicated he did have a God and had a belief in that God...but that his notions of God did not comport with any sect.

Quote:

Third, there is no need to prove without question that he was completely sane over the matter of religion or not as a man who did not openly buy into the religion dogma of any of the major faiths and was charge with being an atheist when running for president a charge he never address was still elected president.


That still does not make him an atheist. Every president ever elected has been charged with all sorts of things. That does not mean that any of those things actually apply.

Quote:
So there is no reason therefore to state that an atheist could not be elected president when Jefferson who did everything but stated "I am an atheist" was indeed elected president!!!!!!!!!!!


AND I AM NOT STATING THAT, BILL...IF YOU WOULD OPEN YOUR EYES AND READ...I THINK YOU WILL SEE THAT I SAID I DO NOT KNOW IF JEFFERSON WAS AN ATHEIST OR NOT.

YOU, ON THE OTHER HAND, ARE STATING THAT AN ATHEIST WAS ALREADY ELECTED IN THE PERSON OF JEFFERSON.

If you are saying you THINK or GUESS an acknowledged atheist can be elected president...fine. I THINK or GUESS that one cannot.

But for you to suggest you KNOW one has...is absurd. Why not finally acknowledge that it is...and be done with this?

And, since you are so damn sure an atheist can be elected president...how about responding to my question about any acknowledged atheists who have ever been elected to any lesser national offices.

Of all the people who have been elected to national office during our 237 year history...I have found only two...and one of those served for thirty plus years before revealing his atheism...and was defeated two elections later.

Comment on that.

igm
 
  2  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 07:03 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

I did not miss your post mate...I am going to answer it in a bit...Wink Very Happy

Smile
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 07:06 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
YOU, ON THE OTHER HAND, ARE STATING THAT AN ATHEIST WAS ALREADY ELECTED IN THE PERSON OF JEFFERSON.


In my opinion, he was indeed an atheist and even without polls at the time it is also my opinion that a large percents of the voters of that era shared my opinion that he was an atheist and he was still elected president of the US.

But you are also free to think that the man was not view by the general population of the time as an atheist if you care to as there was no modern polling to said one way or another.

People here also are free to get a copy of the Jefferson bible where he had removed all the supernatural elements from the new testament and look at his body of his life time writings and draw their own conclusions.

They are also free to get a hold of the surviving copies of the newspapers of that era and form their own opinion of the likely prevailing opinions of the voters who elected him twice to the office of the president.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 07:09 am
Jefferson, or any of a number of other presidents, MAY have been atheists. I do not know…I doubt anyone else does either (unless one of the living or ex-presidents is an atheist and is not sharing that information.)

We grant that we Americans MAY have already elected an atheist. To suggest we have on the basis of the evidence available at this time…is illogical.

It certainly is possible that some day, someone will come along and say, “I am an atheist and I am running for president”…and be elected…so when I stated that I think one can’t be elected, I actually meant I think it highly unlikely at this time.

It is my opinion that the American electorate is not disposed to elect an acknowledged atheist or agnostic any time soon…but I thought it was not disposed to elect a black president either.

I hope I am as wrong about the election of an acknowledged atheist (or agnostic) as I was about the election of a black.

If I have overstated any part of that case in my “discussion” with Bill, I apologize.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 07:16 am
@BillRM,
Quote:

In my opinion, he was indeed an atheist and even without polls at the time it is also my opinion that a large percents of the voters of that era shared my opinion that he was an atheist and he was still elected president of the US.


If you want to make those kinds of guesses in the face of a lack of real evidence...do so. I am not arguing with your guesses.

I am arguing that you cannot logically assert that America already has elected an atheist as president.

Quote:

But you are also free to think that the man was not view by the general population of the time as an atheist if you care to as there was no modern polling to said one way or another.


I do not have that view. How many times must I say that I do not know. I am arguing against your assertions that that was the case.

As you say, there was no polling...so for you to assert AS YOU HAVE that most of the general population considered him to be an atheist is absurd.

Quote:
People here also are free to get a copy of the Jefferson bible where he had removed all the supernatural elements from the new testament and look at his body of his life time writings and draw their own conclusions.


They certainly are...and the best conclusion, in my opinion, is that Jefferson thought the superstitious nonsense in the Bible is NONSENSE.

That does not make him an ATHEIST.

Only someone with a closed mind would suppose that makes him an atheist.

Quote:
They are also free to get a hold of the surviving copies of the newspapers of that era and form their own opinion of the likely prevailing opinions of the voters who elected him twice to the office of the president.


And if they have close minds, they can come to the conclusion that the prevailing opinion was that he was an atheist. If they have open minds, they probably will come to the conclusion that they cannot make a determination based on that information...

...and that anyone asserting that Jefferson WAS AN ATHEIST...is simply selling a guess.
0 Replies
 
igm
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 08:12 am
@FBM,
FBM wrote:

The problem for me is that with religion as the placebo, there are people so addicted to it that they demand that the rest of the world believe that the placebo is real medicine, and that those who don't use it - because they don't need it - are bad people deserving death and damnation. Furthermore, they want to prevent people from using anything else but their brand of placebo, again, punishable by death and damnation. I have a problem with those people not because they're using the placebo, but because they're hostile and aggressive to the rest of us.

Of course should that happen then it would be reprehensible and you'd be right to condemn it seemingly in my opinion. What's important is what the Buddha taught and why because that may well be the best criteria on which Buddhism should be judged.

Of course if we don't 'fully' understand what the Buddha taught and why then our opinions may just be mistaken but for those uninterested in such things then of course... that is as it should be.
igm
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 09:09 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

how is Buddhism in your opinion different from atheism i.e. what is the 'most important' difference?
In Buddhism a deity or god is not seen as ‘creating’ this world or any of the universe or anything contained therein i.e. living beings, places or things. So, insofar as atheism would agree with Buddhism on this then Buddhism would say that ‘one’ of its defining characteristics is that it is atheist in the respect of there not being a creator god or gods. So, Buddhism is not ‘just’ atheist but has additional characteristics and atheism is just one of them (as defined above).

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

Do you think that Buddhism does not have beliefs?

The essence could be explained in terms of meditation. In some meditations one is trying to experience what ever appears in front of one e.g. phenomena such as colors, sounds, feelings, thoughts etc. ‘without’ labeling that experience in any way whatsoever.

So, the absence of labeling would mean that if a Christian was meditating then that meditator may think everything I am now seeing was created by God. A Buddhist could have the same thought but would immediately try to see that the thought was mere labeling and let go of it. Why? Because if labeling is abandoned then the state of mind that is free from it is a happy mind and that happiness isn't created by labeling but by abandoning labeling. This means that happiness is not dependent on what labels we attach to phenomena, or the world or the universe or other people, places and things but when discovered, seems to arise free from causes and conditions and therefore isn't or seems not to be impermanent in the way happiness which arises due to labeling is. This experience can apparently then be taken into everyday life.

I hope this helps to explain one way I'd talk a little about Buddhism from the 'angle' of meditation and its connection with atheism and why Buddhists meditate.
Brannum12
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 09:18 am
@John Creasy,
Every creations must have creator. Is is possible to create anythings without creator? Look around you.... Why people think about atheism? But is is right that believe on God from all of heart is tough.... For believe on God from all of heart we should thinking research, mediation about GOD and OWN SELVES ...
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 09:21 am
@igm,
Thank you mate...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 10:38 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
You wrote,
Quote:
Yes, I believe that Christianity provides a solution to all of the injustices in the world, by rewarding people with an eternal afterlife in Heaven...


I read this and thought it hilarious! Look what christians are trying to do in the US; they're trying very hard to control women's bodies by legislating a fetus as a human and making abortion illegal - all while supporting US aggression against other countries, and killing tens of thousands of innocent people in the name of "self defense."

Not long ago, the same christians were against equality for gays and lesbians; "discrimination" against people they don't even know or care about - otherwise.

They are control freaks of the worst kind; all hypocrites. They want a fetus to come to full term and be born, but ignore any support for them, and leave that responsibility to the woman they don't even know or care about.

Control freaks; all of them!
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 11:44 am
@cicerone imposter,
Did you also not read what I explained I think Christians are doing and why? And what I think they are going to have to do to find salvation themselves?

There is no one who is not worthy of death...and there is no one who is above judgment...

If God is going to save people...he is going to save them all...If God is going to condemn people, then no one is safe, or knows what they will have to do, in order to be saved, until their judgment happens...
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 11:48 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Sorry; too much reading for this old man. Can you point me to that post?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 11:54 am
@cicerone imposter,
It was the same exact post you got that quote from...Just read the whole thing...
0 Replies
 
Kolyo
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 12:01 pm
@Ice Demon,
Ice Demon wrote:

If you are a cynical atheist, you sometimes have to wonder why any one should reward any persons, who couldn't afford to bring a child into the world, but was stupid enough to do so otherwise...


Great way to talk about an oppressed woman in the Third World who has no reproductive rights and might well have conceived after having been coerced into having sex! Rolling Eyes

(Religions are the main force propping up patriarchy and bear a large share of the blame for Third World overpopulation.)
0 Replies
 
Kolyo
 
  1  
Thu 21 Mar, 2013 12:08 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
but it's all in the hope of bringing about a new order in the world that has both more heart and more common sense than the current one.


I think we might all sign up for that Kolyo. Can you explain how to do it?


My general idea is to take the path of least resistance. In an increasingly polarized political climate, find a theme that many powerful interest groups agree with and few powerful interest groups would oppose. The issue on which I choose to fight to the death is ... <drumbeat>... free and convenient childcare services for working mothers. Lack of decent childcare almost cut Elizabeth Warren's law career short when she was in her 20s.
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
American Atheists Barred from holding Office - Discussion by edgarblythe
Richard Dawkins doesn't exist! - Question by Jay2know
The New State Religion: Atheism - Question by Expert2
Is Atheism the New Age Religion? - Question by Expert2
Critical thinking on the existence of God - Discussion by Susmariosep
Are evolution and the big bang true? - Discussion by Johnjohnjohn
To the people .. - Question by Johnjohnjohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 08:23:14