@Setanta,
Quote:This is hilarious. I knew this would be good.
It is hilarious I agree. But it isn't good on an atheist thread that not one educated atheist will offer a justification for bringing new life into what everybody knows is a vale of tears, trial and tribulation and a weary world of woe and where the most appalling risks have to be run by this new life which, in the nature of things, cannot be consulted.
The silly and childish sophistries we see, on this very page, are clear evidence that this important matter is being evaded. And in one case evaded by a chap who justifies the US containing 300 million guns on the grounds of the risks involved in just going to the shops or cinemas or to bed.
Mark Twain said he felt guilt and pain all the rest of his life because he advised his brother to be a riverboat pilot and he got killed in the job. Flaubert said he would rather be thrown in the Seine with a stone tied round his neck than father a child. And I have seen abortion justified on the grounds that the life aborted was better off being so.
Long winded blatherings about tooth fairies and the like and proving negatives are discussing atheism like sex lesson teachers discuss rumpy-pumpy. The thread is supposed to be about what it's like being an atheist and here we are with no atheist prepared to step forward on an issue which dwarfs all the other matters being brought up like Mt Everest dwarfs a grain of sand. In actual fact, and we know how important facts are to atheists, it is the only issue in sight.
Your Government wants babies so that they have a steady supply of people to boss around, tax, and who will go to hell and back to keep them in power. Hence all the cute pictures of smiling babies and the fuss being made over the Duchess of Cambridge's pregnancy which, from a scientific point of view, is the same as any old pregnancy up and down the land and from sea to shining sea. It's importance is a spiritual matter involving the mystique of aristocracy
and, on past form, will cause a small spike in the birth rate. Just as recessions cause downward blips.
Our primary school system is alleged to be 250,000 places short next year which I presume is the effect of the rattling good boom which ended when Leman Bros. bit the dust. The Government seemingly having not noticed what was happening. The idea that class sizes are increased by two or three would get blocked by the NUT for reasons I needn't explain to such an audience as I am here addressing.