92
   

Atheists... Your life is pointless

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 03:11 am
Bump . . . i just wanted to point out the equal opportunity contempt . . . an atheist who is a pious fraud is just as contemptible as any religious fool with the same condition.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 06:14 am
@FBM,
Thanks for the response FBM.

Interesting.

One answer caused me to wonder if I misunderstood it...or if there is a subtly that I do not understand.


Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Are there any "spirits" that are not imagined?


If speaking in absolute terms, I wouldn't know. Speaking only about my own experiences, yes.


If the final answer to the question is "yes"...(there may be an ambiguity), but one possible inference is that your experience has shown there actually are some spirits which are not the product of imagination.

Any comment?
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:28 am
The only matter worth considering regarding the question of the pointlessness of life, which atheists have to accept, is that of the unborn.

What is the point of bringing new lives into the world if life itself is pointless bearing in mind the tribulations which life entails? Being unborn in Roman times was a blessing. And in many other times and places.

Discussing the point of a life already in existence is rather silly because its existence gives it a point.

Bringing forth new life thoughtlessly is animalistic.
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:54 am
@spendius,
One might very well suppose that the great difficulties Roman government had in persuading the higher classes, the literate and educated, to have children was due to the fate they saw as likely to be visited upon any children they produced set against the benefits of the futility of a pointless life. A calculus of the joys and pains so to speak.

Which suggests that a literate society will, inevitably, think itself into extinction. The higher classes now have less children than others. So do the more literate nations than others.

Providing a point to life, even if it is make-belief, might be said to be the only reason we are here doing what we do.

On such an argument, promoting atheism is force to wreck our civilisation which is why only fools engage in it.



FBM
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 09:32 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

Thanks for the response FBM.

Interesting.

One answer caused me to wonder if I misunderstood it...or if there is a subtly that I do not understand.


Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Are there any "spirits" that are not imagined?


If speaking in absolute terms, I wouldn't know. Speaking only about my own experiences, yes.


If the final answer to the question is "yes"...(there may be an ambiguity), but one possible inference is that your experience has shown there actually are some spirits which are not the product of imagination.

Any comment?



Yes, mainly to the effect that I should proofread what I write more carefully. Smile

I don't know if there are any spirits in the universe that are not imaginary. I do know that I imagined the ones I used to believe in. Can't speak for anyone or anything else.

As for the possibility that the spirits I used to believe in were/are real and that I am mistaken about having only imagined them, but have merely ceased to believe in them, that seems to me to be an unknowable without empirical evidence. If anybody has some, I'm open to it. In the meantime, I'm just reporting what my brain used to do and the way it's behaving now.

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 10:15 am
@FBM,
Quote:
Yes, mainly to the effect that I should proofread what I write more carefully.

I don't know if there are any spirits in the universe that are not imaginary. I do know that I imagined the ones I used to believe in. Can't speak for anyone or anything else.

As for the possibility that the spirits I used to believe in were/are real and that I am mistaken about having only imagined them, but have merely ceased to believe in them, that seems to me to be an unknowable without empirical evidence. If anybody has some, I'm open to it. In the meantime, I'm just reporting what my brain used to do and the way it's behaving now.


You covered all bases. I am impressed. Thanks.
Kolyo
 
  2  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 05:51 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

Once the discussion determines if an atheist's life is pointless, perhaps someone could explain why belief in a god gives a point to the believer's life. I don't see it, myself. Perhaps some of you good people do see it.


If you choose to believe in God, you may just as well choose to believe in a God which has the power to give your life a purpose. For me, God symbolizes every aspect of life that the "relativisms" have killed off -- true purpose, objective reality, objective morality, etc.
neologist
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 05:53 pm
@Setanta,
I is real, kind sir.
0 Replies
 
Kolyo
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 05:55 pm
But there's nothing wrong one's life having no point.

A sphere has no vertices and has long been considered perfect.

Atheists live ... a spherical life (which is what I've tagged this thread).
neologist
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 05:57 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Hi Frank. Glad to see you're still here.
0 Replies
 
MattDavis
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 06:01 pm
@Kolyo,
Kolyo wrote:
For me, God symbolizes every aspect of life that the "relativisms" have killed off -- true purpose, objective reality, objective morality, etc.
Well said Kolyo. Very Happy
The yawning cavern of nihilism.
0 Replies
 
MattDavis
 
  2  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 06:05 pm
@Kolyo,
bump...
[X] Spherical Life
spendius
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 06:10 pm
@MattDavis,
Nothing to say about my last posts Matt?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 06:52 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Nothing to say about my last posts Matt?


Quote:
One might very well suppose that the great difficulties Roman government had in persuading the higher classes, the literate and educated, to have children was due to the fate they saw as likely to be visited upon any children they produced set against the benefits of the futility of a pointless life. A calculus of the joys and pains so to speak.

Which suggests that a literate society will, inevitably, think itself into extinction. The higher classes now have less children than others. So do the more literate nations than others.

Providing a point to life, even if it is make-belief, might be said to be the only reason we are here doing what we do.

On such an argument, promoting atheism is force to wreck our civilisation which is why only fools engage in it.


I may not be the one you are looking for a reply from but do you think that just as you have a bias about the spelling of civilization "that you could also have a bias or be caught up in sociological currents that decide what is true in your understanding?
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:01 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

One might very well suppose that the great difficulties Roman government had in persuading the higher classes, the literate and educated, to have children was due to the fate they saw as likely to be visited upon any children they produced set against the benefits of the futility of a pointless life. A calculus of the joys and pains so to speak.

Which suggests that a literate society will, inevitably, think itself into extinction. The higher classes now have less children than others. So do the more literate nations than others.

Providing a point to life, even if it is make-belief, might be said to be the only reason we are here doing what we do.

On such an argument, promoting atheism is force to wreck our civilisation which is why only fools engage in it.






I actually don't disagree much with what you say in here, but nonetheless it is surprising stumbling on a sort of side weak "cheer up" argument against atheism such as this, specially coming from you...have you run out of ideas on why a personal God with religion and parade is necessary ? Anti depression pills will run God out of job soon... Wink
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:23 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Quote:
I actually don't disagree much with what you say in here,


Quote:
One might very well suppose that the great difficulties Roman government had in persuading the higher classes, the literate and educated, to have children was due to the fate they saw as likely to be visited upon any children they produced set against the benefits of the futility of a pointless life. A calculus of the joys and pains so to speak.


Really ? why wouldn't they have children out of sexual desires just as the rest of us? ]Were the sexually deprived or sexually retarded?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:25 pm
@reasoning logic,
No offense RL...but who do you think is not bias in some sort of way? Yes, it is nice to be sympathetic, empathetic etc...

But part of the reasons why we are, who we are, and may be as special of a life form as we may be is because of our acknowledgements of thinking we are correct, and acknowledging we are not when we think we are incorrect...It is the main distinction that makes us different than any other life form...

The ways you make it sound by how you try to explain that people are sociopathic/psychopathic...etc...Sounds like even after you acknowledge that we evolved from nothing, or absolute zero...Or had a value of "0"...It sounds like after you acknowledge you think we have evolved from nothingness, you still think we still have a value of zero, or a negative value...Which is just not simply possible...If even one person does something just to try to be nice, it gives all of humanity a higher quantitative value higher than zero forever...

The ways you make it sound about how you think it is possible that existence itself could have a negative value...Would require myself to try to come to some twisted/strange thinking that would require one thinking there is a God, who proves himself to us, and says we will be happy forever, does it, then flips one day and just shows himself as some sort of hideous monster, and wishes to make us suffer and punish us in all kinds of disgusting ways, forever...and would then gratify itself at these ideas or something...on top of it all...And that is how people would have this negative value or something...that would render us less than a value of zero, after knowing we evolved from nothing, or came to be from something who may have been nothing, but specifically wanted us to be...

And there are at least 3 good reasons why it is not worth it to think about these notions...

1. If this God does exist, and wishes to do this...It makes no difference what we think or try to do, anyways...

2. You always have to have faith that nothing would want to do this to us if it could, or it makes no difference anyways...

3. If something exists that is said to be a God, and is that much inferior than we are, there is no reason to believe we could not stop this God from doing this...We would be able to make a pact where one could outsmart it, and let everyone cease, even if one has to suffer forever, and then it would give everyone a value, and it would still give this one life a value, even if forever suffering, because then this one person would be a savior-ish kind of person...and everyone thanking them as they cease to exist and not suffering from this wicked God would be their reward to remember forever, and give everyone a value...as well as this one soul...
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:32 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
the reasons why we are, who we are, and may be as special of a life form as we may be is because of our acknowledgements of thinking we are correct, and acknowledging we are not when we think we are incorrect...It is the main distinction that makes us different than any other life form.


Does this include all humans or do you think that there could be a possibility that some of our love ones fall into a category that other animals may fall into? "not making fun of them or trying to take advantage of them.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:32 pm
@reasoning logic,
Sexual desires don't equate to necessarily having children a long long time, specially regarding the ruling classes RL...(Egyptians come to mind)
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Fri 15 Mar, 2013 08:39 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Does this include all humans or do you think that there could be a possibility that some of our love ones fall into a category that other animals may fall into? "not making fun of them or trying to take advantage of them.

Does it actually make any difference? If there are people who do fall into this category, and there are other who do not...How is sociopathic/psychopathic an accurate description of human existence itself? And not just an anomaly, based upon your own projections of people who may be socio/psycho? That simply can not represent the full value of existence itself, since there are many who do not fall into this group...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
American Atheists Barred from holding Office - Discussion by edgarblythe
Richard Dawkins doesn't exist! - Question by Jay2know
The New State Religion: Atheism - Question by Expert2
Is Atheism the New Age Religion? - Question by Expert2
Critical thinking on the existence of God - Discussion by Susmariosep
Are evolution and the big bang true? - Discussion by Johnjohnjohn
To the people .. - Question by Johnjohnjohn
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 07/09/2025 at 04:41:46