@XXSpadeMasterXX,
The difference is that i am not making pronouncements from ignorance as you are doing. I haven't tried to describe any "atheistic position," and if you had actually understood the point it was making, you'd know that i deny that there is any such thing a
the atheistic position.
Don't try to play Frank's witless epistemological games with me. If you want to play that bullshit, then every time you shoot your mouth off about atheist, i would be entitled to ask you how you know that, or if you are just guessing. Among other things that you don't understand is rhetoric. If you make a claim, i need only find one example which contradicts you to invalidate your claim. However, if you want to establish your claim, you have to do a lot better than a half dozen or so people whose opinions you have read here, and have probably grossly mis-characterized. (Like that hilarious bullshit you came out with about two atheists who said they'd believe if they had "a sign from god"--ah-hahahahahahaha--at least you're entertaining.)
As for knowing "no more than [you] do," although i find it hard to believe that there are very many people as ignorant as you who are still willing to spout nonsense about what others do or don't know or believe, once again, i don't have to produce measurable amounts of evidence. If i find one case which contradicts you, that is sufficient. You really, really have no clue about forensics and rhetoric.
You're also employing a straw man, or are merely a liar. Where have i claimed that "atheism is solely about rejection?" Quote and link the post. Otherwise, i'm entitled to call you a liar.