92
   

Atheists... Your life is pointless

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 07:16 pm
@reasoning logic,
No it's not, you can make fun all you want. Krumple has decided to put his own interpretation on things based, on the simple fact that you can't prove one way or the other that this life is all we have. Therefore everyone is agnostic regardless of what they believe,

I disagree, agnosticism is accepting you don't know one way or the other, and a lot of people who would not class themselves as agnostic will admit to a small element of doubt. There are others who are convinced otherwise, there is no doubt.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 07:24 pm
@izzythepush,
OK maybe you are correct on this one because of a technicality.

Quote:
NO ONE has "knowledge" that a god exists


Knowledge seems to be subjective and we all know that SpadeMaster has knowledge of the existence of God. Now if Krumple was to say "scientific proof" then I think he may be speaking factual, but then again agnosticism is not about scientific proof but rather knowledge.
But then again I can be wrong about all of this.
0 Replies
 
Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 07:29 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Krumple wrote:

Two different things entirely. Everyone, absolutely EVERYONE is agnostic. There is not a single person left out of this. Why? Because absolutely NO ONE has knowledge that a god exists. Therefore by the very definition everyone is agnostic, weather they want to admit it or not, they are.


Rubbish, some atheists are convinced this is all there is, others are equally convinced that is not the case. You can argue that logically the only realistic viewpoint one can come to is agnosticism, but that's not how it plays out in the real world.


The problem is, some people have developed this idea that there is some middle ground between being an atheist (non believer) and a theist (believer).

The reality is, there is no middle ground between them. It isn't a spectrum it is a binary position, either you believe or you don't.

Agnosticism isn't about weather you believe one might exist or you are on the fence and can't decide or make up your mind. If you are using the word agnostic to describe not being able to decide one way or the other then you are using the word incorrectly.

Agnostics are concerned with having knowledge of a god or gods existence. They claim that since they don't have this knowledge they can't determine if a god exists.

If a person has knowledge that a god exists, they wouldn't need faith. Their faith would be replaced with the knowledge that one exists. Faith is in other words wanting/hoping that a god exists. With nothing more to base the belief on other than a wishful desire.

I don't make up the words or their definitions but I guess that doesn't stop people from trying to bend definitions to suit some other meaning they have for them. If we start playing that game then the rules of language fall apart and everything talked about will become meaningless.

If you are on the fence and can't make up your mind, don't use the word agnostic to describe yourself because doing so, you don't tell people what are who you really are, because those who understand the definition correctly will not understand your position correctly. This is why it is important to learn the correct definition and use it properly.

reasoning logic
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 07:34 pm
@Krumple,
Quote:
If a person has knowledge that a god exists, they wouldn't need faith.


Spade master has signs and other people have the living word of God
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 08:15 pm
@Krumple,
Quote:
The problem is, some people have developed this idea that there is some middle ground between being an atheist (non believer) and a theist (believer).

The reality is, there is no middle ground between them. It isn't a spectrum it is a binary position, either you believe or you don't.

Agnosticism isn't about weather you believe one might exist or you are on the fence and can't decide or make up your mind. If you are using the word agnostic to describe not being able to decide one way or the other then you are using the word incorrectly.

Agnostics are concerned with having knowledge of a god or gods existence. They claim that since they don't have this knowledge they can't determine if a god exists.

If a person has knowledge that a god exists, they wouldn't need faith. Their faith would be replaced with the knowledge that one exists. Faith is in other words wanting/hoping that a god exists. With nothing more to base the belief on other than a wishful desire.

I don't make up the words or their definitions but I guess that doesn't stop people from trying to bend definitions to suit some other meaning they have for them. If we start playing that game then the rules of language fall apart and everything talked about will become meaningless.

If you are on the fence and can't make up your mind, don't use the word agnostic to describe yourself because doing so, you don't tell people what are who you really are, because those who understand the definition correctly will not understand your position correctly. This is why it is important to learn the correct definition and use it properly.

I have to agree with Izzy, it is entirely possible, and fine for someone to be completely down the middle...

Once again, an atheist or "free thinker" is not able to see the optimism...

I will explain it to you...

First if a God is not real, and they are split, then they are living their life harmoniously to themselves, and others, and being real...They just do not believe the answers can be explained, this makes perfect logical sense...

If a God is real, then they are at least saying, well I was ignorant to the whole fact, but God, I did not go out of my way to spit in your face...

Agnosticism, makes a hell of a lot more sense to me, than atheism does... 2 Cents

and if you are an atheist, you truly should feel the same way about agnosticism, apposed to believers? Do you not? Therefor, rendering it truthful, and possible...

Like I said, they seem to understand themselves, and what and how they feel as at least some attempt to be real...Which most atheists do not...as soon as critical arguments are brought about they throw that blanket over their heads...

This is evident, because you would not have people who say they believe in the non-existence of a God(s) but then try to back out by saying something like, Well I am not 100% sure...Well then, it that is the case, then your belief/lack of belief is bogus, and I haven't seen much "evidence" from atheists to disprove that...Once again they can easily explain to ALL of us, what they wish for others who appose what exactly it is where are buying into, but they do not, and prolong it even more!! It is like saying your a humanist, but then sitting their for enjoyment, to watch and animal, or person suffer to death....

The one thing I will say is this...

It seems to me, I agree, the definition of agnosticism, does not seem to answer or solve any questions, nor define you...

But this might not be all that bad! for you see it gets theists, and atheists alike to put the gloves down for a second, and actually get to know, and understand someone...rather than being Bias, and or rejecting something that BOTH atheists and theists do!!!
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 08:19 pm
@reasoning logic,
Logic, what is with all of this...
Quote:
Spade master has signs and other people have the living word of God

It seems since I was gone and came back you did this 2 or 3 times...If you want my opinion, why did you not just ask me??

Where you bringing me in because you thought I was reputable...Or was it an attempt to minimize the arguments of me, while I was away??
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 08:31 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
SpadeMaster, rather than explaining “agnosticism” I would prefer to give my personal feelings regarding “the existence of gods” and “life after death.” I prefer to leave the "labeling" for some possible future moment. I think this might help promote this discussion…and I hope it will eliminate the “promotion of agnosticism” objection that comes up often. It also will eliminate the need to discuss differences between agnosticism and atheism.

Ok...

Quote:
As regards “the existence of gods” and “life after death”…my personal position is that I do not know…and have no reasonable evidence upon which to base a guess that "there are gods or there are no gods"…or that "there is life after death or that there is nothing after death."

Do these opinions go all the way down the middle with every situation or circumstance? Or is it just things pertaining to theists, and atheists??

In other words, if confronted with having an abortion, what position would you take? If confronted with getting a divorce, or giving up parental rights to your children, what would you think, and or do?? As far as Morality, do you believe religious are wrong? As far as science, do you believe it is possible, or impossible to try to "disprove" a god...Or do you think it can be done??

Quote:
Either side of both those issues seem to be possible…or at least, I see nothing to indicate the existence of gods is an impossibility; I see nothing that indicates gods are necessary to explain existence; I see nothing to indicate that "life after death" is necessary to explain anything; and I see nothing to indicate that "life after death" is an impossibility.

What kind of things would you say you know for sure? Or are certain of? Where do you draw the line in the sand?? Seems that saying you do not know for sure, isn't such a bad thing, either one way or another, whatever way you break it down, and kinda playing it safe...But there must be things you are certain of?? Does it have to do with what you can see, and experience? this implies to me it is closer to atheism, than theism, and maybe not down the middle?? Only down the middle, due to philosophical debates??

Quote:
The truth is: There is no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) there are gods; no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) there are no gods; no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) there is “life after death”; and no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) that “life after death” does not exist. (I understand and acknowledge that intelligent, reasonable people--theists and atheists--often think otherwise on these points, but that can be part of the discussion.)

Why do you believe because you feel this way, that that is truth??
Do you question it? Since your down the middle?? Or are you Certain that this is truth to be down the middle??

Quote:
I see absolutely no reason to suppose that, considering all the aforementioned, the default position I should take is “There are gods (or there is a GOD)” and there is life after death”…or “There are no gods and there is nothing after death.”

Why do you not go around saying you do not know the answers?? Do you believe it has something to do with other peoples perceptions of you? and thinking your dumb?? (this is just on the outside looking thru the glass)

Quote:
Take your time about responding…ask what questions you will.

I have done so, thanks, look forward to your reply!
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 08:50 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
The truth is: There is no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) there are gods; no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) there are no gods; no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) there is “life after death”; and no logical reason to assume (guess or believe) that “life after death” does not exist. (I understand and acknowledge that intelligent, reasonable people--theists and atheists--often think otherwise on these points, but that can be part of the discussion.)

Why do you believe because you feel this way, that that is truth??
Do you question it? Since your down the middle?? Or are you Certain that this is truth to be down the middle??

The best way I can explain this is this...I do not want to try to work with the skepticism in you, everyone works, and feds off of that...I would be interested, in working with things that you are certain of...What kind of things are you certain of? and why are you not down the middle about them??
0 Replies
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 09:06 pm
@Krumple,
Quote:
The problem is, some people have developed this idea that there is some middle ground between being an atheist (non believer) and a theist (believer).

The reality is, there is no middle ground between them. It isn't a spectrum it is a binary position, either you believe or you don't.

As far as Philosophical things are concerned...it is absolutely 100% possible to be completely down the middle...and I agree with Izzy...

As far as everyday living, I agree with the above, and what you had said....

I don't think I understand how a Person can be down the middle, when they are ''confronted with a choice" and have/and obviously do make a choice...One way or another...Their must be things they are certain of, and things they are certain of not...
Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 09:25 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

Quote:
The problem is, some people have developed this idea that there is some middle ground between being an atheist (non believer) and a theist (believer).

The reality is, there is no middle ground between them. It isn't a spectrum it is a binary position, either you believe or you don't.

As far as Philosophical things are concerned...it is absolutely 100% possible to be completely down the middle...and I agree with Izzy...

As far as everyday living, I agree with the above, and what you had said....

I don't think I understand how a Person can be down the middle, when they are ''confronted with a choice" and have/and obviously do make a choice...One way or another...Their must be things they are certain of, and things they are certain of not...


The irony is heavy here. Funny how you are trying to invent this position that doesn't exist. It goes to show that theists really don't want to live in reality, they insist on inventing things that are contrary to reality. It is impossible to hold a position in between belief and lacking belief. It can not exist. There is no such thing has half belief.

The fact that you can't figure this out shows your mentality. You are a like a little kid who simply can not accept the fact that santa is not real. You do everything in your imagination to try and make it real despite all the information to the contrary.

Your attempt to define a person who is unaware of a gods existence with a person who "is" ( I have to use is very lightly here because no one actually holds this position you are trying to describe) aware of a gods existence yet does nothing with it.

Nothing more than fantasy land.

I know what you are attempting to say but you are going about it all wrong. Let me try to change the subject of the discussion to something that parallels the same line of thinking.

I don't believe in gremlins. Could gremlins be real and exist? Sure, but I still don't believe they exist. I have nothing to base their existence on to believe that they are real. The same is true for a god, yet you can't see this case as being exactly the same. You insist on a special case yet there is just as much evidence to prove the existence of gremlins as there is to prove the existence of a god. Which is to say, absolutely none.

Do I think that a god could exist? Sure, but I have no reason to think that one does. If it does, it would know what would convince me. The fact that it does not provide me with that information means something. Either it does not care/want/need to provide that information or it does not exist in the first place so there is no god there to provide the information.

If you don't believe a god exists. Then you are an atheist.

If you believe a god does exists. Then you are a theist.

There is no in between. Any attempt to try and state that there is, only shows your lack of understanding of reality.
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 09:27 pm
@Krumple,
If you would like me to explain more, I will...



Quote:
Explain away, but I can already tell some of your mindset is rather saddening for me. Demonizing those who think differently is where the bloodshed of history gets it's name and where future crimes are made.

Coi' inly Sir!

But First let me ask you a few question so that it is not a waste of time again...

You said you have read the Bible right? and you said you understanding of it is good then??

I have not read the Qur'an in entirety, Have you? But from what I have read there are about 8 or 9 things that jump out as a red flag....

Answer my questions first, and I will dive into the comparisons of The Torah, Bible, and Qur'an...

And how I believe that Islamic Scriptures are not of the same Divine Authority of the first 2....
Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 09:49 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

If you would like me to explain more, I will...



Quote:
Explain away, but I can already tell some of your mindset is rather saddening for me. Demonizing those who think differently is where the bloodshed of history gets it's name and where future crimes are made.

Coi' inly Sir!

But First let me ask you a few question so that it is not a waste of time again...

You said you have read the Bible right? and you said you understanding of it is good then??

I have not read the Qur'an in entirety, Have you? But from what I have read there are about 8 or 9 things that jump out as a red flag....

Answer my questions first, and I will dive into the comparisons of The Torah, Bible, and Qur'an...

And how I believe that Islamic Scriptures are not of the same Divine Authority of the first 2....


I have read both of them yes. Although I have read the bible more than the koran. Not really a choice but both are very similar. Sure there are minute details that either one go into that the other does not. But the over all message is the same. Fear a god, accept it's existence or be banished and shunned for not doing so.

My response to this is, if a god holds this attitude then it does not qualify or is not worthy of my respect or admiration let alone praise. That type of mentality worked for nomad bronze aged people but it doesn't work for me. I think there are many christians that it doesn't work for either so they attempt to reinvent the god of the bible into something else which is not supported by the text. They are so insistent on this that the refuse to acknowledge the fact that what they are trying to sell does not reflect what the bible or the koran try to sell.

This reveals that theists are not concerned with truth. They desperately want something to be true that reality does not support to be true.
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 09:56 pm
@Krumple,
Quote:
The irony is heavy here. Funny how you are trying to invent this position that doesn't exist. It goes to show that theists really don't want to live in reality, they insist on inventing things that are contrary to reality. It is impossible to hold a position in between belief and lacking belief. It can not exist. There is no such thing has half belief.


The funny thing is you say all that, then ruin it at the end by stating that an agnostic is a half belief...Which is not the mentality they have, So I think you should respect it...Since you do not fully understand your own, and do not respect theists...this is a case of where it is better to listen than to talk...

Quote:
The fact that you can't figure this out shows your mentality. You are a like a little kid who simply can not accept the fact that santa is not real. You do everything in your imagination to try and make it real despite all the information to the contrary.

Not true at all, in any way!! You can not even begin to understand what I have seen and experienced that destroys imagination...and trying to make it real despite information to the contrary...Do you mean like asking me about healing masses? then saying something stupid like, Live with your dam ear infection, feed the starving children??

Quote:
Your attempt to define a person who is unaware of a gods existence with a person who "is" ( I have to use is very lightly here because no one actually holds this position you are trying to describe) aware of a gods existence yet does nothing with it.

Who says I do nothing with it?? Do you even know what I have, have not done??

Quote:
Nothing more than fantasy land.

bullshit! It is nothing more than fantasy land, to ask a question about prayers, than a Christian gives you an example...and you suit it up for your tastes by saying some kind of asinine remark like live with you dam ear infection, feed the hungry, as though we could not pick up on the fact that what I was in fact saying, causes problems with you doubts...Not only that but you profess how God is unwilling to prove himself, then when one explains something that is extremely not the norm, you try to discredit it for your tastes, and act like you did not feel the conscience speaking to you, saying there may be truth to this after all!! not only that, But you said it in a way that implies that yo know what it better or best over a God does, when you claimed you would have to be convinced in an undeniably way...Which is exactly what happened, or you would not have felt "compelled" to say live with your dam ear infection, feed the hungry...Can you see why maybe a God is delaying time for us??

Quote:
I know what you are attempting to say but you are going about it all wrong. Let me try to change the subject of the discussion to something that parallels the same line of thinking.

Do whatever you feel is going to work, I am still gonna answer from a person of faith...

Quote:
I don't believe in gremlins. Could gremlins be real and exist? Sure, but I still don't believe they exist. I have nothing to base their existence on to believe that they are real. The same is true for a god, yet you can't see this case as being exactly the same. You insist on a special case yet there is just as much evidence to prove the existence of gremlins as there is to prove the existence of a god. Which is to say, absolutely none.

Wrong, you "think" there is absolutely none! But your reply earlier (read above) tells me that your not being 100% truthful!! Things fall under a All of nothing, or 50/50 split, or anywhere in between...

When your gremlins provide miracles, and a stigmata or something like it, I will admit there is just as much evidence to support both of them!!

Quote:
Do I think that a god could exist? Sure, but I have no reason to think that one does. If it does, it would know what would convince me. The fact that it does not provide me with that information means something. Either it does not care/want/need to provide that information or it does not exist in the first place so there is no god there to provide the information.

You and so many other atheists say this/ or these kind of things, but as soon as some kind of "unexplained compulsions" kick in, and your conscience speaks directly to you...You feel the need to try to run and hide from it, as if that can fool a God, and change/alter the outcome if he is real...

Quote:
If you don't believe a god exists. Then you are an atheist.

I agree!

Quote:
If you believe a god does exists. Then you are a theist.

I agree!

Quote:
There is no in between. Any attempt to try and state that there is, only shows your lack of understanding of reality.

Wrong Indeed! If you cant disprove me, and I can not disprove you, why would it be impossible to be a middle ground on this matter??

To assert there's not because it does not seem to be acceptable to you, when you are not even of that kind of belief/lack of belief, shows that your the one who is trying to suit things to your taste or out of touch with reality, and living in a fantasy land....And further it says basically to me, that the only acceptable way to you, and people who have this mentality, that the only such possible outcome is that of Atheism...But once again you do not take the time in all of this post, or any rebuttals whatsoever, to show others, theists and agnostics alike, what it is we are to be buying into, and what comes with a atheistic society...=bullshit!
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 10:01 pm
@Krumple,
Quote:
I have read both of them yes. Although I have read the bible more than the koran. Not really a choice but both are very similar. Sure there are minute details that either one go into that the other does not. But the over all message is the same. Fear a god, accept it's existence or be banished and shunned for not doing so.

My response to this is, if a god holds this attitude then it does not qualify or is not worthy of my respect or admiration let alone praise. That type of mentality worked for nomad bronze aged people but it doesn't work for me. I think there are many christians that it doesn't work for either so they attempt to reinvent the god of the bible into something else which is not supported by the text. They are so insistent on this that the refuse to acknowledge the fact that what they are trying to sell does not reflect what the bible or the koran try to sell.

This reveals that theists are not concerned with truth. They desperately want something to be true that reality does not support to be true.

See, but that is where your wrong, would you like me to explain it or not?? Seems you think you understand theism's more than theists do??

If you have that kind of mentality, I am not so sure I wish to discuss anything anymore with you...For if there is no reasoning going on...and your already opinionated, then it is a waste of my time, and I might as well move on down the road...
0 Replies
 
Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 10:07 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:
Not true at all, in any way!! You can not even begin to understand what I have seen and experienced that destroys imagination...and trying to make it real despite information to the contrary...Do you mean like asking me about healing masses? then saying something stupid like, Live with your dam ear infection, feed the starving children??


This is why I feel chrisitians are dangerous and have a mild type of psychosis.

You miss my point entirely. If I ask you which is more severe, your ear infection or a child starving? What would you say? My point being. A god is willing to cure your ear infection yet wouldn't help the starving children? There is a problem here that you ignore. Why would a god help you with something so minor as an ear infection when there are far worse conditions out there to solve? Let me try to put it a different way.

There are two people. One person is heavily wounded, they need medical attention or they will surely die. The other person has a sliver in their finger. You have a choice to make on who to treat, which one do you treat?

According to you, god would answer, help the person with the sliver. I find this being the wrong answer. Sure I don't know the mind of god because there is no god there to know.

Here is the other thing. Your natural healing over something supernatural is in line with reality. If you had not gone to healing mass I bet your ear would have healed eventually. To me nothing miraculous happened because a natural result could have ended with the same conclusion.

The funny thing is miracles that people try to claim happen to day are drastically different than the miracles that are proclaimed in the bible. Yet the ones in the bible never happen to day. It is always something insignificant like solving an ear infection. I want to see an actual miracle, why not show gods greatness and feed the starving children for a change?
0 Replies
 
Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 10:11 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:
Wrong Indeed! If you cant disprove me, and I can not disprove you, why would it be impossible to be a middle ground on this matter??


You are either exercising trollism or you are borderline retarded. There is no middle between belief and non-belief. There is no half belief. Why you refuse to understand this supports the first statement. You don't care about what is true or real. This is evident. If you are just being a troll, I can understand. However; if you aren't then you have a type of delusional psychosis.
Krumple
 
  1  
Tue 28 Feb, 2012 10:27 pm
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:
Wrong, you "think" there is absolutely none! But your reply earlier (read above) tells me that your not being 100% truthful!! Things fall under a All of nothing, or 50/50 split, or anywhere in between...


That's the thing, it does not matter. If I think there is none that is the issue. I am not convinced that there is. This you can't seem to comprehend. You are convinced but I am not. You saying that I should be convinced does not convince me either. I require more. If that more is not provided then there is no way I can accept it. If you say this is all I get, then it is not good enough for me. It might be for you, but it will never be for me.

XXSpadeMasterXX wrote:

When your gremlins provide miracles, and a stigmata or something like it, I will admit there is just as much evidence to support both of them!!


I have never witnessed a miracle or stigmata. So everything else is anecdotal. You are trying to convince me with your own testimony. It does not work because I can explain away your experience to be a natural occurrence. I need or require information that I have not been provided with. A god would understand this fact, but yet I still have not been provided with that information. You claim you have had experienced a miracle or stigmata, I haven't. I am skeptical that you really have or it was a trick like all the other so called stigmatas.

I don't think you are lying, I just think that you are wanting these things to be true, so your experience gets bent and you fabricate it to be something more than it was. It is very common, many people do that with all sorts of experiences. This is why the human experience is not a basis for belief. It is untrustworthy. I think you have convinced yourself that what you experienced was an authentic experience.

There have been numerous christians turned atheists who have revealed that they too thought they had experiences such as yours but when it came down to it, they were convincing themselves that these events were miracles when in reality they weren't.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Wed 29 Feb, 2012 02:03 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
Logic, what is with all of this...
Quote:

Spade master has signs and other people have the living word of God

It seems since I was gone and came back you did this 2 or 3 times...If you want my opinion, why did you not just ask me??

Where you bringing me in because you thought I was reputable...Or was it an attempt to minimize the arguments of me, while I was away??


I was just using you as an example we all know of. If you find that I say it incorrectly please correct me.

Quote:
Or was it an attempt to minimize the arguments of me, while I was away?


You do realize that I respect you and I agree with some of your arguments but not all. It is not like I am trying to be mean to you or anything evil.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 29 Feb, 2012 02:33 am
@Krumple,
You're the one making up your own definition of words.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 29 Feb, 2012 02:42 am
@Krumple,
Krumple wrote:
. There is no middle between belief and non-belief. There is no half belief.


Of course there is, and you can stamp your feet as much as you like, but it won't change anything. Why do you have to believe in extremes?

Refusing to accept your definitions doesn't make Spademaster a troll. You need to grow up.

 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
American Atheists Barred from holding Office - Discussion by edgarblythe
Richard Dawkins doesn't exist! - Question by Jay2know
The New State Religion: Atheism - Question by Expert2
Is Atheism the New Age Religion? - Question by Expert2
Critical thinking on the existence of God - Discussion by Susmariosep
Are evolution and the big bang true? - Discussion by Johnjohnjohn
To the people .. - Question by Johnjohnjohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 11:28:44