homosexuality is not 'unnatural'

Questioner, I don't know what you mean...please elaborate.

There are also some rather obvious indicators that homosexuality isn't necessarily a natural tendancy. The posterior being made primarily as a one-way path being one.

Who says, first of all? Heterosexuals have anal sex all the time.

Questioner wrote:

There are also some rather obvious indicators that homosexuality isn't necessarily a natural tendancy. The posterior being made primarily as a one-way path being one.

Who says, first of all? Heterosexuals have anal sex all the time. And second, what are the other signs?

But I still can't handle the goat thing.

John Creasy wrote:

Where did you "prove" anything???

MA, these people have no love, and I certainly have no love for them.

Please go back and read my post where I back up my reasons for my opinions. All you seem to have is "it's my opinion!" and nothing else. You want to argue, then argue. But debating is more than you're wrong and I'm right.

We have no love? No love for immature, hate spewing cry babies maybe. I have plently of love for those who deserve it.

Bella Dea wrote:

Questioner wrote:

What I was trying to point out is that from a nature-inspired genetic standpoint, anal sex does not appear to be what the human body was programmed for. Thus, homosexuality is more likely NOT a genetic characteristic, but one of personal decision.

The human reproductive system appears to be set up to perform a specific function.

exactly

First, how am I a crybaby? You are awful quick to accuse me of this. I backed up my beliefs just as much as you did. The fact is, you can't "prove" that homosexuality is natural, nor can I "prove" that it isn't. What about this concept don't you get?

I could easily argue that since sex is nature's way of propagating the species, that two people who have incompatible sexual organs have no business having sex. I don't know if that would be considered morality, but it doesn't have anything to do with God. That's just nature.

Since when do I have to "prove" anything?? Prove to me that it IS only a religious issue. We are both stating opinions and nothing more.

Get over yourself. If being a "big kid" means being an internet geek like you, then no thanks. BTW, you didn't prove anything, you just spouted off your opinions and insulted me for disagreeing with you. There is no proof to this issue, only opinions.

Wow!!! YOU REALLY SHOWED ME!!! You go girl!!!!!!!

You are starting to annoy me with your arrogance. I challenged you back but you are apparently too good to answer me.

Where did you "prove" anything???

MA, these people have no love, and I certainly have no love for them.

Questioner wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

Questioner wrote:

What I was trying to point out is that from a nature-inspired genetic standpoint, anal sex does not appear to be what the human body was programmed for. Thus, homosexuality is more likely NOT a genetic characteristic, but one of personal decision.

The human reproductive system appears to be set up to perform a specific function.

exactly

Please note the part I've highlighted in red.

Then how do you explain the extreme pleasure derived from pressure on the prostate gland, which can only be achieved anally?

John Creasy wrote:

Questioner wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

Questioner wrote:

What I was trying to point out is that from a nature-inspired genetic standpoint, anal sex does not appear to be what the human body was programmed for. Thus, homosexuality is more likely NOT a genetic characteristic, but one of personal decision.

The human reproductive system appears to be set up to perform a specific function.

exactly

Please note the part I've highlighted in red.

Then how do you explain the extreme pleasure derived from pressure on the prostate gland, which can only be achieved anally?

Because the prostate is one of the driving forces behind the male sexual drive, aiding in ejaculation. Jamming a finger, rod, or baseball bat produces an effect similar to what it does naturally during completion.

And so you know, that post was meant for you John, not for Questioner who DOES back up assertions and arguments.

I, however, must take my leave of A2K for the night. Anxiously awaiting your answer.

I could easily argue that since sex is nature's way of propagating the species, that two people who have incompatible sexual organs have no business having sex. I don't know if that would be considered morality, but it doesn't have anything to do with God. That's just nature.

Since when do I have to "prove" anything?? Prove to me that it IS only a religious issue. We are both stating opinions and nothing more.

Get over yourself. If being a "big kid" means being an internet geek like you, then no thanks. BTW, you didn't prove anything, you just spouted off your opinions and insulted me for disagreeing with you. There is no proof to this issue, only opinions.

Wow!!! YOU REALLY SHOWED ME!!! You go girl!!!!!!!

You are starting to annoy me with your arrogance. I challenged you back but you are apparently too good to answer me.

Where did you "prove" anything???

MA, these people have no love, and I certainly have no love for them.

John Creasy wrote:

Questioner wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

Questioner wrote:

What I was trying to point out is that from a nature-inspired genetic standpoint, anal sex does not appear to be what the human body was programmed for. Thus, homosexuality is more likely NOT a genetic characteristic, but one of personal decision.

The human reproductive system appears to be set up to perform a specific function.

exactly

Please note the part I've highlighted in red.

Then how do you explain the extreme pleasure derived from pressure on the prostate gland, which can only be achieved anally?

I wouldn't know, I never have nor will I ever find out. So let me guess, you think God gave us a prostate gland for sexual pleasure???