1
   

homosexuality is not 'unnatural'

 
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 01:48 pm
It would seem that if it is Nature's "mistake", it is still natural. A Supernature's mistake would be un (or extra) natural.
To me the very idea of nature--since it requires for its "meaning", the concept of the non-existent supernature--is problematical. There is simply what is (as opposed to what "isn't"). If you want to bifurcate "reality" into natural and supernatural (or is and isn't) that's your privilege, but, while dualism in general is necessary for the human mind, it also it generates unnecessary problems. This is an instance of that.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 04:52 pm
I agree JL.

Why make things more complicated than they need to be?
0 Replies
 
Greyfan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 06:15 pm
I think the issue of whether or not homosexuality is natural or unnatural is a less important question than whether or not it is immoral.

Outside of the prohibitions against homosexuality from most of the world's religious cults, and the resulting fear and prejudice instilled by them in some heterosexuals, I am unaware of any inherent evil.

Perhaps someone would care to present a case demonstrating the moral problem that does not involve God's alleged position on the issue. Because unless this case can be made, the issue of whether or not homosexuality is the result of nature or environment is somewhat beside the point. Natural or not, unless harm can be clearly demonstrated, it is not a fit subject for the legal and cultural suppression which has occurred throughout history and continues today.
0 Replies
 
John Creasy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Nov, 2005 08:22 pm
the prince wrote:
kosmos-SErbia wrote:
I so do not agree that homosexuality is natural.
we're made to have relationships with different pole.
We can take homosexuality like a NATURE's mistake.


Thank god for this mistake I say....


eewwww!! Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Nov, 2005 05:25 pm
Greyfan I agree. And since no harm can be demonstrated, I consider it no problem. From the Prince's perspective, homosexuality is one of Nature's blessing. More power to him.
Greyfan, I'm quite certain that morality is man's creation, not some God's. Indeed, God is also man's creation. We must consider, as Nietzsche points out, that morality--like the grammar that deludes us into thinking dualistically--is the creation of a mankind in a distant and primitive past when s/he was supremely ignorant. We MUST comply with our culture's rules (in order to avoid shame and punishment), but in our private and philosophical moments we should be cognizant of the artificial (i.e., cultural) nature of morality, not a God-given reality.
0 Replies
 
kosmos-SErbia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 06:58 am
we can't say it's natural but we cannot judge homosexuals and question their morale I think...that's their and this is our way of living......
0 Replies
 
John Creasy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 09:08 am
JLNobody wrote:
homosexuality is one of Nature's blessing. More power to him.


Blessing??? I don't see how that could be considered a blessing. More like nature's curse.

JLNobody wrote:
Indeed, God is also man's creation. We must consider, as Nietzsche points out, that morality--like the grammar that deludes us into thinking dualistically--is the creation of a mankind in a distant and primitive past when s/he was supremely ignorant.


Congratulations, this is a miracle. You are the one person in the history of the world to "know" this for sure. It's such a privilege to talk to you. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
kosmos-SErbia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 09:54 am
John Creasy wrote:
JLNobody wrote:
homosexuality is one of Nature's blessing. More power to him.


Blessing??? I don't see how that could be considered a blessing. More like nature's curse.

JLNobody wrote:
Indeed, God is also man's creation. We must consider, as Nietzsche points out, that morality--like the grammar that deludes us into thinking dualistically--is the creation of a mankind in a distant and primitive past when s/he was supremely ignorant.


Congratulations, this is a miracle. You are the one person in the history of the world to "know" this for sure. It's such a privilege to talk to you. Rolling Eyes


word.
0 Replies
 
agrote
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 10:06 am
kosmos-SErbia wrote:
we can't say it's natural...


But... why not? It is natural. Sexuality is determined to a large extent by your genes. Natural.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 10:13 am
I have a slightly off-topic question for those people who believe homosexuality to be unnatural/immoral/ungenetic.... what do you propose we do with the millions of non-heterosexuals in the world?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 10:25 am
Careful, Littlek.Creasy will consider it a privilege to talk to you--after he distorts your message by quoting only part of it.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 11:03 am
JL - good point, but I'm still curious.
0 Replies
 
kosmos-SErbia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 12:57 pm
littlek wrote:
I have a slightly off-topic question for those people who believe homosexuality to be unnatural/immoral/ungenetic.... what do you propose we do with the millions of non-heterosexuals in the world?


to kill them. Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
jus' kidding.let them live.but we have to try to make it extinct.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 12:59 pm
How do you think that extiction could happen?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 01:14 pm
If there is a gene for bigotry, eugenics might be considered as a solution for the elimination of bigots.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 01:15 pm
Laughing

I still think that logo looks like a Pride logo.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 01:22 pm
Kosmos' avatar? Funny that!
0 Replies
 
John Creasy
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 01:49 pm
littlek wrote:
I have a slightly off-topic question for those people who believe homosexuality to be unnatural/immoral/ungenetic.... what do you propose we do with the millions of non-heterosexuals in the world?


Are you are implying that anyone that believes homosexuality to be unnatural, desires something be "done" with homosexuals?

I don't think anything should be done with anybody. People should be free to live their lives as they wish as long as it doesn't harm anybody.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 01:51 pm
And things like gay marriage harm people how?
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 Nov, 2005 02:00 pm
For me, it's not the person I have problems with. It is the act itself. I am a Christian and I believe homosexuality is a sin in God's eyes.

But, and I mean this so sincerely, IT DOES NOT MEAN I SHOULD HATE THAT PERSON! It does not mean that I treat that person with any less respect I would give anyone. Christians are not to judge one another. That is God's authority alone.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 07:22:30