1
   

Is Gravity Really Intelligent Design?

 
 
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 01:15 pm
Evangelical Scientists Refute Gravity With New 'Intelligent Falling' Theory
August 17, 2005

KANSAS CITY, KS?-As the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools continues, a new controversy over the science curriculum arose Monday in this embattled Midwestern state. Scientists from the Evangelical Center For Faith-Based Reasoning are now asserting that the long-held "theory of gravity" is flawed, and they have responded to it with a new theory of Intelligent Falling.

"Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University.

Burdett added: "Gravity?-which is taught to our children as a law?-is founded on great gaps in understanding. The laws predict the mutual force between all bodies of mass, but they cannot explain that force. Isaac Newton himself said, 'I suspect that my theories may all depend upon a force for which philosophers have searched all of nature in vain.' Of course, he is alluding to a higher power."

Founded in 1987, the ECFR is the world's leading institution of evangelical physics, a branch of physics based on literal interpretation of the Bible.

According to the ECFR paper published simultaneously this week in the International Journal Of Science and the adolescent magazine God's Word For Teens!, there are many phenomena that cannot be explained by secular gravity alone, including such mysteries as how angels fly, how Jesus ascended into Heaven, and how Satan fell when cast out of Paradise.

The ECFR, in conjunction with the Christian Coalition and other Christian conservative action groups, is calling for public-school curriculums to give equal time to the Intelligent Falling theory. They insist they are not asking that the theory of gravity be banned from schools, but only that students be offered both sides of the issue "so they can make an informed decision."

"We just want the best possible education for Kansas' kids," Burdett said.

Proponents of Intelligent Falling assert that the different theories used by secular physicists to explain gravity are not internally consistent. Even critics of Intelligent Falling admit that Einstein's ideas about gravity are mathematically irreconcilable with quantum mechanics. This fact, Intelligent Falling proponents say, proves that gravity is a theory in crisis.

"Let's take a look at the evidence," said ECFR senior fellow Gregory Lunsden."In Matthew 15:14, Jesus says, 'And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.' He says nothing about some gravity making them fall?-just that they will fall. Then, in Job 5:7, we read, 'But mankind is born to trouble, as surely as sparks fly upwards.' If gravity is pulling everything down, why do the sparks fly upwards with great surety? This clearly indicates that a conscious intelligence governs all falling."

Critics of Intelligent Falling point out that gravity is a provable law based on empirical observations of natural phenomena. Evangelical physicists, however, insist that there is no conflict between Newton's mathematics and Holy Scripture.

"Closed-minded gravitists cannot find a way to make Einstein's general relativity match up with the subatomic quantum world," said Dr. Ellen Carson, a leading Intelligent Falling expert known for her work with the Kansan Youth Ministry. "They've been trying to do it for the better part of a century now, and despite all their empirical observation and carefully compiled data, they still don't know how."

"Traditional scientists admit that they cannot explain how gravitation is supposed to work," Carson said. "What the gravity-agenda scientists need to realize is that 'gravity waves' and 'gravitons' are just secular words for 'God can do whatever He wants.'"

Some evangelical physicists propose that Intelligent Falling provides an elegant solution to the central problem of modern physics.

"Anti-falling physicists have been theorizing for decades about the 'electromagnetic force,' the 'weak nuclear force,' the 'strong nuclear force,' and so-called 'force of gravity,'" Burdett said. "And they tilt their findings toward trying to unite them into one force. But readers of the Bible have already known for millennia what this one, unified force is: His name is Jesus."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,287 • Replies: 23
No top replies

 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 01:23 pm
Shocked

i am very afraid

i think jello biafra said it best, "if evolution becomes a crime, than only criminals will evolve"
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 03:26 pm
"Faith Based Reasoning"?????
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 03:45 pm
'Faith-based reasoning' makes every bit as much sense as 'compassionate conservatives,' Deb.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 04:05 pm
i think what bothers me most is the fact that these people treat science as some form of witchcraft
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 04:06 pm
So God can't do his magic in space?
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 04:14 pm
Lord Ellpus wrote:
So God can't do his magic in space?



what is this blasphemy of which you speak

unbeliever
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 04:15 pm
djjd62 wrote:
i think what bothers me most is the fact that these people treat science as some form of witchcraft


You mean it's not??
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 04:52 pm
Mery Andrew do you have a source and link for this? Confused
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 04:57 pm
Acquiunk wrote:
Mery Andrew do you have a source and link for this? Confused


Hell, no. And I won't give you the e-mail address of the demented friend who sent it to me, either.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:02 pm
Figures, I'm highly skeptical of the entire enterprise...although I wouldn't put it past that crew.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:07 pm
Acquiunk wrote:
Mery Andrew do you have a source and link for this? Confused


i now know the source, and believe me it's a very reputable source
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:07 pm
Uh...hey, wait a minute here...is someone taking this seriously? I thought it was fairly obvious that this is a lampoon. At least, I hope to hell there's nothing true in that post. Now I'm getting paranoid.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:18 pm
Merry Andrew you had better get paranoid. That satire is close enough to reality to give the reader at least momentary pause. There is no full explanation for gravity yet in physics and the radical evangelical right jumps at any opportunity to discredit science.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:32 pm
Merry Andrew wrote:
Uh...hey, wait a minute here...is someone taking this seriously? I thought it was fairly obvious that this is a lampoon. At least, I hope to hell there's nothing true in that post. Now I'm getting paranoid.


a lampoon, but the source of the story is where i get all my news and information
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:33 pm
I got an email with this link today -
Pat Robertson lays blame for hurricane on Sunday
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:36 pm
oh my god, i laughed so hard i snorted

this maybe the funniest thing i've ever read

He said employees at the Christian Broadcasting Network had put together a list of 283 nominees, presenters, and invited guests at the Emmys known to be of sexually deviant persuasions.

"God already allows one awards show to promote the homosexual agenda," Robertson declared. "But clearly He will not tolerate such sinful behavior to spread beyond the Tonys."
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:38 pm
i want to see that list, sexually deviant persuasions, are jim baker and jimmy swaggart invited
0 Replies
 
goodfielder
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 05:47 pm
It's either a good lampoon or they're jumping the shark :wink:
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Sep, 2005 06:18 pm
I don't think it's a lampoon. I'll look at it once more..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is Gravity Really Intelligent Design?
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 05:35:28