boomerang wrote:I think Rafe will probably make a million dollars going around speaking about ethics.
I don't think Rafe is an expert on ethics. He tries to paint himself as a "good guy," and wants to believe he is a "good guy," but he falls short like the rest of us.
His decision to bring Danni to the final three rather than Lydia was totally self-serving. He had a promise from BOTH Danni and Stephanie, if they won final immunity, that they would take him to the final two. Lydia, on the other hand, was totally loyal to Stephenie.
In his RNO interview, Rafe admits his self-serving motivation:
Quote:RNO: Do you think you could have won the final immunity challenge if you hadn't slipped up?
Rafe: I think Danni still would have won. She had a great position on the pole and she’s a marathon runner. I knew going into final three with them, I probably wasn’t going to win the challenge. That’s why I wanted to be with them, because I thought both of them would take me.
When he gallantly released Danni from her promise, and she accepted that release and took Stephenie instead of him, then Rafe was guilty of "sour grapes."
Quote:RNO: When you released Danni from any final two obligations after the last immunity challenge, was that purely you being a nice guy, or was it strategy as well to show just how nice a guy you were and thus encourage her to take you?
Rafe: At the time, it was just going on emotion. But it was part of my strategy too. My strategy was to be myself. It did turn out to make the decision harder for her than otherwise. It was a really difficult decision. I really did want her to make her own decision, and that made it even harder.
RNO: On The Early Show, she said it actually made the decision easier.
Rafe: I didn’t see it. But the thing it did do was give her an easy excuse.
Source
Rafe really didn't intend to "release" Danni from her promise. His illusory release was an empty "see how great I am" gesture--he still expected her to honor her promise--no exuses allowed.
If he was genuinely a nice, ethical person, he would have stood by his release and would not harbor hard feelings. If he didn't mean it; he shouldn't of said it. Did he really expect Danni or any other person on this earth to hand him the game and a million dollar prize simply because he portrays himself to be a nice guy? He had no ethical problems in stabbing his own alliance members in the back to get himself further in the game and closer to the prize money. Why should he begrude the fact that Danni took Stephenie rather than him?
Obviously, Rafe thinks a heck of a lot of himself. HE believes that HE was most deserving of winning the game. In his jury question to Danni, he asked Danni why she did the OPPOSITE of what she said she would do:
Quote:Rafe congratulates them both, saying they were like sisters to him and he’s proud that one of them will win. He begins with Danni, noting that she said if she ever was in the position where she got to go to the final two and could decide her opponent, she would take the person who most deserved to win. What happened when she had that decision and made an opposite choice? Hmmm, that seems to imply that he is sure she believes he was the most deserving.
Source
Why does Rafe think he deserved to win more than Stephenie--the person Danni chose to sit next to her in the final two?
And really . . . if Rafe had been left starving in a jungle for 38 days and there weren't ANY cameras on him and no one would ever know that he ate the sacrificial chicken . . . don't you think he would have eaten the chicken?
Rafe, in my opinion, is more concerned with appearances rather than substance. He's not nicer, more moral, or more ethical than the rest of us.