Bella Dea wrote:Why should those who don't believe in God win? Seriously. I have just as much right to say it with the "under God" part as you do to say it without. You want to talk about hypocrisy...why is it that when you want it out it's "constitutional" but when we want it in, we are religious fanatics?
you are assuming that everyone who wants the pledge to revert to the pre-mccarthy era text is an atheist.
pro-UGers love to say, "it can be any god". but, when pressed repeatedly, judge roy moore, one of the main players in the get-as-much-god-in-there-as-you-can movement, admitted that he believed that the referrence to god was the judaeo-christian god. which by extension also includes allah.
no news flash there, everybody knows which god is meant. but is rarely admitted. and that is dishonest.
so if you are not jewish, christian or muslim, why would you ever want or agree to pledge allegiance to someone else's god ?
if you, personally, are a christian, how would you react if the government of your country insisted that any time you pledged your loyalty to the country, you must also pledge loyalty to Odin ? or as frank has mentioned, zeus ? how about the great salmon of the celtic tradition ?
would you willingly do that ?