Goodness me....
Do you think we need to serve a salad with this meal or just stick with the main course?
NO
Nope. I hope there's no legalization for this activity. It's the same meaning for murdering. Imagine someone peel off your flesh and eat it! OMG! I cant stand it.
Hex wrote:Nope. I hope there's no legalization for this activity. It's the same meaning for murdering. Imagine someone peel off your flesh and eat it! OMG! I cant stand it.
Not to worry the odds are that if they got to eating you, you'd no longer be among the living so it would no longer be a bother to you.
But I don't want people to eat my dead body. If there is no space for my coffin, I rather donate my organs out thn having people eating me.... sounds horrible....
Would not it be better to let your friends and family dine on your body than to have worms and other critters do so?
But it's still unacceptable for me....
Why are you so hungry over human's flesh? Well, I don't think my parents nor siblings will eat my flesh.
You will be dead so what will it matter? Besides wouldn't you be happier knowing that at least a part of you was still living inside someone else and had served to extend a life span?
Did anybody hear of that guy who advertised for somebody so he could eat them?
I think it was in Germany.
A guy travelled to meet the 'canniball' so he could be eaten.
Obviously the guy died, but what gets me is that the canniball was arrested for murder!
Surely it cant be murder if the 'victim' is willing.
Personnaly I wouldnt want to eat human flesh, not when you think of all the diseases we have.Not much of a reason but enough to put me off.
But if others want to eat it then go ahead.
If its such a disgusting idea, why do Christian churches positively promote it? If transubstantiation means anything, it means Christians are cannibals no?
Steve-
Mailer wrote a book called Cannibals and Christians which I have read.
ah but did you devour it?
save me reading it, what did it say?
Steve asked-
Quote:save me reading it, what did it say?
The usual you know.What a great guy Norm is and how intelligent and well hung.That essay about the frog's livers (I think) is in there but it's a bit risque to say the least.I'll have a quick look soon.It's upstairs somewhere.
On the link it is much to complex at this late hour.
ok thanks
its only transubstantiation. Used that word more times in last 1/2 hour than previously in my whole life.
Now I can spell it too. I like it.
I'm just off to try it out again Steve.
spendius wrote:I'm just off to try it out again Steve.
well do let us know what you think
and whether it should be legalised.
Steve-
If you mean eating human flesh I'm not bothered one way or the other.I won't be eating any if I can help it and I can't imagine anybody wanting to eat me.Unless you are using another meaning for "eat" of course.
I don't think many participants of communion feel like they are eating Jesus in any literal sense but it might be a good thing if people felt pious now and again even if they are conned into it.
Steve-
Yeah-I liked it too.It flows real nice don't you think.
It gets almost close to conveying a mental state.On reflection I might prefer "have to be" to "are".
Did you ever read that sentence-"I was in bed with the catamite when the Archbishop called to tell me the President had resigned."
I can't reach that yet.It's one of my favourite first sentences.
