17
   

The 47th President and the Post-Biden World

 
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 06:59 am
@Lash,
Will you admit to being wrong?
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 08:20 am
@izzythepush,
Specifically about what?
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 08:26 am
@Lash,
About supporting Palestine by voting republican.

I thought the meaning was pretty clear, and a darn sight clearer than your pseudo cryptic factoids.
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 08:38 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

About supporting Palestine by voting republican.

I thought the meaning was pretty clear, and a darn sight clearer than your pseudo cryptic factoids.

I didn’t do that nor did I suggest it.
I voted for the only anti genocide, pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist candidate on the US ballot for president.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 09:12 am
@Lash,
You did suggest it, heavily.

At least have the courage to stand by your posts.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 09:15 am
@izzythepush,
Here it is again. Your implied/suggested comments are in bold.

izzythepush wrote:

From a blocked thread.

Lash wrote:
Despite his 100m donation from Miriam Adelson, Trump appears to be bending Israel over and shoving a ceasefire down their throat while he’s at it. Zionists are losing their minds on X right now.

This was something Biden was too much of a coward to do. This is on the verge of becoming the Democrats genocide

If Palestine is a red line for you as it is for me, NEVER vote democrat again.

Twitter
~Benjamin Rubenstein


https://able2know.org/topic/555216-964#post-7388374

Quote:
Donald Trump has suggested large numbers of Palestinians should leave Gaza to “just clean out” the whole strip, after ordering the US military to restart shipments of 2,000lb bombs to Israel.

The US president said he wanted Gaza residents to move to neighbouring nations, and that they could be displaced “temporarily or could be long-term”, after a phone call with Jordan’s King Abdullah on Saturday.

“I’d rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they can maybe live in peace for a change,” Trump told reporters on Air Force One. “You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing and say: ‘You know, it’s over.’”

Gaza has 2.3 million residents. Trump said he asked King Abdullah if the country would take in more Palestinians.


More at link

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/26/trump-resumes-sending-2000-pound-bombs-to-israel-undoing-biden-pause
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 10:48 am
@izzythepush,
Show it to me.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 10:49 am
@izzythepush,
That was AFTER THE VOTE.

And it was a fact.

And those were someone else’s words.

I never will vote Democrat again.

Or Republican.

This has no relation to the claim you made about me.

You’re lying.
Lash
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 10:59 am
The Workers Strike Back party is gearing up for a ground game to start soon. I’m all in on knocking doors and making sure people know about it. That’s my electoral focus. Post duopoly.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 11:49 am
@Lash,
You clearly don't understand what implying is.

I'm not lying.

It's only now you're saying don't vote Republican either.

And it's almost two years before another federal election.

That's not a coincidence.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Mon 27 Jan, 2025 02:35 pm
Here’s how Trump’s vengeance machine works

Trump’s vengeance machine isn’t only about retribution. It’s also intended to intimidate Trump critics

https://i.imgur.com/wO0441i.jpg?3

Robert Reich wrote:
Trump’s vengeance machine is even more dangerous than it was before.

The Biden administration had given security protection to Trump’s former secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, his former top aide, Brian Hook, and former national security advisor, John Bolton. That was because of credible intelligence showing all three in danger of being killed by agents of Iran. During the first Trump administration, they had authorized the drone strike that killed the powerful Iranian general Qassem Suleimani in early 2020, and Iran is out to get them.

The outgoing Biden administration privately told the incoming Trump administration that the threat against the three continued. “As recently as the end of last week, two separate government representatives, two separate government agencies called,” Bolton told The New York Times. “They said our current assessment is that the threat level remains the same.”

But on Tuesday, with no explanation, Trump revoked their security protection. They are now at the mercy of Iranian agents in America.

What had they done to deserve this treatment by Trump? They had committed the sin (in Trump’s mind) of being more loyal to America than to him.

Pompeo had warned Republicans at the Conservative Political Action Conference in 2023 not to look to “celebrity leaders” with “fragile egos”. Hook was part of the old Republican foreign-policy establishment (Trump fired Hook on Monday). Bolton had become an outspoken critic of Trump.

If you think Trump’s nominee for FBI director, Kash Patel, will protect them from violence, think again. All three are on Patel’s enemies list, which is basically Trump’s enemies list. (I’ll have more to say about Patel next week when he’s up for Senate hearings.)

This is how the Trump vengeance machine works. Trump is the mob boss who keeps his hands clean while others do his dirty work.

Who else is likely to do Trump’s dirty work?

Trump has pardoned all those who attacked the US Capitol on his behalf on 6 January 2021. Trump says they were not violent and did not have weapons – but the world saw their violence; they were also caught on video. Nearly 175 used dangerous or deadly weapons, according to prosecutors.

They also threw Nazi salutes, posted they intended to start a civil war, vowed “there will be blood”, and called for the lynching of Democratic lawmakers.

They attacked police with flag poles, bear spray and a metal whip. They choked officers with their bare hands. They were convicted for, among other things, “hurling officers down a flight of stairs and plotting to kill FBI agents investigating the attacks”.

A video shows them attacking Michael Fanone, an officer, who suffered a heart attack and traumatic brain injury that day. Later he and his family received death threats after he testified in Congress on the incident. They beat Daniel Hodges, a police officer, and crushed him in a door, his mouth filled with blood while he cried out for help.

Now, courtesy of Trump, all these thugs are back on the street. Does anyone really think they will live out the rest of their lives peacefully?

Some of the police officers, including those who testified in January 6 cases, have said they fear for their safety now that the insurrectionists have been released.

“I JUST GOT THE NEWS FROM MY LAWYER… I GOT A PARDON BABY! THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!” Jacob Chansley, dubbed the QAnon shaman as a reflection of his horned-animal headdress and body paint that day, posted on X. “NOW I AM GONNA BY SOME MOTHA FU*KIN GUNS!!! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!”

Jackson Reffitt, who reported his father Guy’s participation in the January 6 riot and was a key witness against him, told reporters he fears for his life now that his father is free.

When Stewart Rhodes, leader of the Oath Keepers, was sentenced to 18 years in prison for his role in the riot, the judge said: “You are smart, you are charismatic and compelling and frankly that’s what makes you dangerous. The moment you are released, whenever that may be, you will be ready to take up arms against your government.” And, presumably, arms against Trump’s enemies.

How many nut-jobs does it take to physically attack someone whom Trump has deemed an enemy? Just ask Paul Pelosi.

Trump doesn’t deliver violence himself. He just says awful things about a person who has crossed him, like Nancy Pelosi, knowing this will be enough to trigger threats or actual violence by one of his followers.

Ask the judges and prosecutors who have tried to hold him responsible.

It doesn’t matter if the awful things Trump says about them are outright lies. In 2018, Trump tweeted a video of Ilhan Omar, a House representative, that falsely claimed she was dancing on the anniversary of 9/11. She received death threats.

Trump directs his mob with winks and nods. “You had some very fine people on both sides,” he says, reassuring violent bigots where his sympathies lie.

“Stand back and stand by,” he says, teeing up the thugs, and then: “Big protest in DC on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!”

His henchman Elon Musk gives a Nazi salute and then denies that’s what he meant, but the neo-Nazis get the message.

Trump’s vengeance machine isn’t only about retribution. It’s also intended to intimidate Trump critics – force them to think twice before sounding any alarms, and chill public knowledge or debate about what Trump is doing.

Be warned. Be safe. And to the extent you can, protect people Trump slams.

guardian
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 03:36 am
Quote:
Yesterday, President Donald Trump began a trade war with Colombia after that country’s president refused to permit two U.S. military airplanes full of deportees to land in Colombia. As Regina Garcia Cano and Astrid Suárez of the Associated Press pointed out, Colombia and the U.S. had an existing agreement for deportations under former president Joe Biden, and it accepted 475 deportation flights from 2020 to 2024, accepting 124 flights in 2024 alone. But the Biden administration used commercial and charter flights, while as national security analyst Juliette Kayyem noted, Trump used a military plane that arrived unannounced.

As Tim Naftali of Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs explained: “If a foreign country tries to land its military planes—except in an emergency—without an existing agreement that is an infringement of sovereignty.” Colombia rejected the military planes without prior authorization and offered the use of its presidential plane instead.

Colombia also asked the U.S. to provide notice and decent treatment for its people, an issue that had been raised and resolved in 2023 after migrants arrived in hand and foot cuffs. Colombian president Gustavo Petro noted that the U.S. had committed that it would guarantee dignified conditions for the repatriation of migrants. The plane of migrants landed in Honduras, where Columbia sent its presidential plane to pick them up.

Trump announced that Colombia’s “denial of these flights has jeopardized the National Security and Public Safety of the United States,” and slapped a 25% tariff on products from Colombia, which include about $6 billion of crude petroleum, $1.8 billion of coffee, and $1.6 billion of cut flowers. In addition, he said, the U.S. would revoke the visas of all Colombian “Government Officials, and all Allies and Supporters.” He promptly deported Colombian staff members of the World Bank who were working for international diplomatic organizations in the U.S., and canceled visa appointments at Colombia’s U.S. Embassy.

Rather than backing down, President Petro threatened to levy a retaliatory tariff on U.S. products. Colombia imports 96.7% of the corn it feeds its livestock from the U.S., putting Colombia in the top five export markets for U.S. corn. According to a letter written by a bipartisan group of lawmakers eager to protect that trade, led by Senator Todd Young (R-IN), in 2003 the U.S. exported more than 4 million metric tons of corn to Colombia, which translated to $1.14 billion in sales. “American farmers cannot afford to lose such a vital export market,” the lawmakers wrote, “especially when access to the top U.S. corn export market, Mexico, is already at risk.”

By this morning the economic crisis appeared to be over, although U.S. visa restrictions apparently remain. With prior authorization and better treatment of migrants, Colombia is willing to accept the migrant flights. The White House declared victory, saying: “Today’s events make clear to the world that America is respected again. President Trump will continue to fiercely protect our nation's sovereignty, and he expects all other nations of the world to fully cooperate in accepting the deportation of their citizens illegally present in the United States.”

The administration’s handling of the situation with Colombia reveals that their power depends on convincing people to ignore reality and instead to believe in the fantasy world Trump dictates.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced yesterday morning that “[d]eportation flights have begun.” In fact, nothing is “beginning.” In 2024, Colombia accepted on average more than two U.S. flights of migrants a week. And, as immigration scholar Austin Kocher noted, “everyone on this deportation flight was arrested and detained by the Biden administration.”

Over the past four years, Trump and MAGA Republicans repeatedly insisted that Biden had maintained “open borders,” while in fact, what the administration did was to try to address a situation made worse by the coronavirus pandemic.

As Katie Tobin of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace explains, before the coronavirus pandemic, Venezuela, where the economy was particularly bad under rising authoritarian Nicolás Maduro, sent migrants abroad. By June 2022, 6 million Venezuelans had fled their country; by September 2024, that number was 7.7 million. South American governments welcomed the Venezuelan migrants and others, including Haitians fleeing their country’s political chaos.

But as economies collapsed after the coronavirus crisis, Tobin explains, migrant populations that had settled in South American countries were forced out. From 2019 to 2021, Colombia’s per capita gross domestic product fell 4.6%; Peru’s, 5.3%; Ecuador’s, 2.8%; Brazil’s, 11.7%; and Venezuela’s, 20%. As the U.S. economy grew by 8.38%, Canada’s grew by 13.1%, and Mexico’s dropped only by 0.7%, migrants headed north. In September 2021, when 15,000 Haitians who had originally migrated to Brazil arrived at the U.S. border with Mexico, countries throughout the hemisphere realized that they needed a new regional approach to migration.

After nine months of negotiations, 21 countries announced that they had created a new migration pact for the Western Hemisphere. It provided economic support for Latin American countries that were original destinations for migrants, expanded formal pathways for immigration, and increased border security across the region.

Canada and Mexico were the first countries to buy into the new agreement. The U.S. turned next to strong ally Colombia, which agreed in March 2022, after which Vice President Kamala Harris brought on board Caribbean countries. By June 10, when the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection was announced, twenty-one nations had signed on. U.N. observers were present to demonstrate their support.

The Biden administration insisted that countries begin immediate action, and they did. Tobin notes that Belize, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Panama, and Peru have made sweeping new offers of legal status to hundreds of thousands of migrants already living in their countries, while Colombia has offered legal status to 2 million Venezuelans and Brazil has welcomed more than 500,000. Mexico and Guatemala have offered legal pathways to workers.

Canada, Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Spain, and the U.S. launched a virtual platform to enable migrants to apply for admission remotely. When Mexico agreed to accept Venezuelans who had crossed into the U.S. unlawfully and at the same time the U.S. announced a legal pathway for 24,000 Venezuelans, border crossings dropped 90% within a week. Biden and Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador expanded that initiative to include Cubans, Haitians, and Nicaraguans.

By 2023, border arrests had fallen by about half. Although Congress failed to pass a strong bipartisan measure to increase border security and fund immigration courts, arrests fell by half again after Biden in June 2024 issued a proclamation that barred migrants from being granted asylum when U.S. officials deemed the border was overwhelmed. By the end of Biden’s term, unlawful border crossings had plummeted to lows that hadn’t been seen since June 2020.

There are new challenges to managing migration as wars, climate change, and economic pressures push migrants out of various parts of Africa and out of China. Many of those migrants are finding their way to Latin America and from there to the U.S. The U.N. Refugee Agency estimates that 117 million people were displaced by the end of 2023.

Trump won election in part by vowing to shut down immigration, and as soon as he took office he canceled the CBP One app, the virtual platform that allowed migrants to apply for asylum. During the campaign, he vowed to deport those migrants he claimed were criminals, which many interpreted to mean he would only remove those who had committed violent crimes (which the U.S. has always done). But in his first term, Trump’s people considered anyone who entered the U.S. outside of immigration law to be a criminal, and this appears to be the definition his people are using now.

Daily deportation raids in which U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested a few hundred people in sweeps began almost as soon as Trump took office. Josh Campbell, Andy Rose, and Nick Valencia of CNN reported that the federal government has flooded the media with video and photos of agents in tactical gear, their vests bearing the words “Police ICE” and “Homeland Security” as they lead individuals in handcuffs. The journalists report that this is not an accident: agents were told to have their agency names clearly displayed for the press.

The presence of television talk show host Dr. Phil (McGraw) with an ICE team in Chicago reinforces the sense that these arrests are designed for the cameras. So does yesterday’s report by Nick Miroff and Maria Sacchetti of the Washington Post that Trump is disappointed with the sweeps so far and has directed officials to ramp up arrests aggressively, providing quotas for ICE field offices. Today, new secretary of defense Pete Hegseth said the department will “shift” to “the defense of the territorial integrity of the United States of America at the southern border.”

Yesterday’s spat with Colombia’s president enabled Trump to declare victory, but Colombia has been the top U.S. ally in Latin America, a close partner in combating drug trafficking and managing migration. That relationship, which has taken years of careful cultivation, is now threatened.

Will Freeman of the Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank specializing in U.S. foreign policy, posted: “I can’t think of many *worse* strategic blunders for the U.S., as it competes w/ China, than going nuclear against its oldest strategic ally & last big country in S. America where it enjoys a trade advantage…. Trump certainly expects that b[ecause] 1/3 of Colombian exports go to the U.S. Petro will be forced to back down. But Petro seems to welcome the fight & has already signaled wishes to deepen ties w/ China. Colombia will lose partnership on security it badly needs. Only China stands to gain from this.”

Indeed, China’s ambassador to Colombia promptly noted that “we are at the best moment of our diplomatic relations between China and Colombia, which are now 45 years old.”

Meanwhile, according to former ambassador Luis G. Moreno, the Trump administration has shut down 2,100 courses in the premier training facility for State Department foreign service officers, ostensibly because they are too associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion. Moreno adds: “Dismantling of a professional diplomatic corps is underway.”

hcr
blatham
 
  4  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 08:42 am
@Lash,
You pasted this tweet...
Quote:
Despite his 100m donation from Miriam Adelson, Trump appears to be bending Israel over and shoving a ceasefire down their throat while he’s at it. Zionists are losing their minds on X right now.

This was something Biden was too much of a coward to do. This is on the verge of becoming the Democrats genocide...
Twitter
~Benjamin Rubenstein

Then responded to Izzy...
Quote:
those were someone else’s words.

Clearly they were. But he didn't post them here. You did. Then after Trump behaved as he did - releasing weapons to Israel which Biden had held back and explicitly advocating for ethnic cleansing ("cleaning out" Gaza, precisely the sort of rhetoric and policy plans advocated by the worst and most racist extremists in Israel) you now refuse to take responsibility and personal agency for what you posted here.

The key reason you are so broadly despised at A2K is that you have no integrity.
blatham
 
  2  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 09:05 am
@hightor,
Re trade/tariffs etc, the majority of products/materials which move from Canada to the US are not finished products you'll find on shelves at Cosco or Walmart etc. They are downstream from that. For example, we send lumber and that lumber is then refined by US businesses into finished doors and windows and furniture, etc. Whatever economic damage is done to Canadian operations is mirrored by the economic damage that will be done to those hundreds of thousands of American operations who will now have to charge more and thus will be less attractive to buyers. Make China Great Again.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 11:47 am
@blatham,
Izzy tried using those words to prove I advocated voting for Trump.
The fact that they weren’t my words was only one of several reasons that passage didn’t prove his claim.

Go back to sleep.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 11:56 am
@Lash,
If you post something it's always assumed you agree with what you've posted unless you make it very clear that you disagree.

They're not your words but you endorsed them.

It's just another example of your duplicity.
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 12:39 pm
@izzythepush,
I did agree with it.

Only someone completely strangled by duopoly thinking could equate “I’m never voting Democrat again” with “Therefore obviously I must vote Republican.”

I quit the duopoly in 2016 and I will NEVER GO BACK.

I’m not responsible for your limited thinking.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 01:11 pm
@Lash,
You have spent all your time exclusively criticising Democrats.

If you were as you claim you'd have been like Mercutio, a curse on both your houses, but you didn't.

You may have occasionally mentioned your support for the American green party, and you may even have praised Stein as much as Trump has, but in essense your message hasn't changed.

You've stayed anti Democrat throughout, you've tried to position yourself to the left of all of it.

It doesn't wash, you constantly pepper your feigned leftist sentiments with far right horseshit.

You're not smart enough to pull it off, never have been.

At least you've stopped using links to buying eEcyclopaedia Britannica, to hide your bogus sources.

Your behaviour has always been dishonest and downright sneaky.
hightor
 
  4  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 01:15 pm
Elon Musk Isn’t Trolling Britain. He’s Doing Something Much Worse.

Louis Staples wrote:
In Britain, the summer of 2012 — when London hosted the Olympic Games with a stunning opening ceremony — is a beacon of nostalgia. In November of that year, Elon Musk visited the country on a business trip, where he rode a bike around the capital. “I met with many interesting people,” he later wrote on Twitter. “I really like Britain!”

His views, to put it mildly, have evolved. Since last summer, when the Labour Party won a landslide majority, ending 14 years of Conservative government, Mr. Musk has accused Britain of going “full Stalin,” being a “tyrannical police state” and sliding toward an “inevitable” civil war. He spent much of January posting, re-sharing and replying to hundreds of posts on X, the social media platform he bought in 2022 and subsequently renamed, that were critical of Britain. He accused senior government figures of covering up sexual abuse committed by grooming gangs and asked his followers whether “America should liberate the people of Britain” from their government.

Some might shrug this off as mere provocation, yet Mr. Musk’s interest in Britain goes beyond trolling. Not only is he clearly engaged with the country’s politics — he is a vociferous champion of the anti-immigration party Reform U.K. — but his fixation is also part of an emerging narrative on the American right that paints Britain as a boogeyman. Most important, it amounts to an aggressive pursuit of his own political agenda, extending his influence overseas. Mr. Musk’s obsession with Britain is really an obsession with his own power.

Mr. Musk’s attention most noticeably turned to the United Kingdom last August, when anti-immigrant riots broke out across England and Northern Ireland. Rioters tried to burn down hotels where asylum seekers were housed and attacked mosques, migrant-owned businesses and police officers. The unrest was set off by misinformation online claiming that the teenager who murdered children at a Taylor Swift-themed dance party in northern England was a Muslim migrant. Central to this torrent of Islamophobic disinformation was X, where calls for violence were amplified.

Keir Starmer, the newly elected prime minister, appeared to call Mr. Musk out. “To large social media companies and those who run them,” Mr. Starmer said at the time, “violent disorder, clearly whipped up online, that is also a crime.” Mr. Musk took the bait. He branded the remarks “insane” and spent the following weeks spreading the nickname “two-tier Keir” — a reference to the conspiracy theory that there is a “two-tier” system of policing in Britain, in which white people are punished more harshly than minority groups. He even shared (then deleted) a fake headline that claimed Mr. Starmer’s government was building “emergency detainment camps” for the rioters.

Since the summer, Mr. Musk’s comments about the country have become even more extreme. In September, he falsely accused the Starmer government of “releasing convicted pedophiles from prison in order to put people in prison for Facebook posts.” He has repeatedly championed the cause of Tommy Robinson, a far-right, anti-Islam British activist with a slew of criminal convictions currently in jail for repeatedly breaking an injunction. During a posting spree at the start of January, Mr. Musk called for a government minister to be imprisoned, for new elections to oust the prime minister and for Mr. Starmer to be charged for complicity in the “rape of Britain.”

All of this could be an attempt to distract from X’s role in the summer riots, for which lawmakers plan to summon him to testify to Britain’s Parliament. Some have wondered whether it might be down to his sleeping habits: Data compiled by The Economist on his posting times suggests he sleeps for only a few hours a night — meaning he is awake and online when the British news cycle begins. The most compelling explanation, though, is ideological.

In his posts, Mr. Musk focuses relentlessly on immigration, free speech, regulation and crime. On these issues, Britain’s center-left government appears to be anathema. And not only for him. For those around Donald Trump, Britain is a “country that is being destroyed,” as Kari Lake put it, or the first “truly Islamist country” with nuclear weapons, as JD Vance bizarrely claimed. American conservatives have often used this type of apocalyptic language about countries such as Venezuela. But Mr. Musk is now spearheading an attempt to turn Britain — one of America’s closest allies — into their new adversary.

Much of the material for this narrative, oddly, comes from Britain itself. Since the Conservatives were defeated last summer, disaffected right-wingers have sought solace in trash-talking their country to an American audience. The former home secretary, Suella Braverman, insists that Britain is beset by a “lunatic woke virus” — language favored by the likes of Ron DeSantis. Liz Truss, the former prime minister who has appeared at the Republican National Convention, on Fox News and alongside Steve Bannon, rails against the shadowy “deep state” forces that supposedly brought her 49-day tenure to an end.

Ms. Braverman and Ms. Truss, who both descended on Washington to cheer on Mr. Trump’s inauguration, are at the top of the list of possible high-profile defectors to Reform U.K., which has been steadily gathering support from disgruntled Tory donors and politicians as it positions itself as the “real opposition” to Mr. Starmer’s government. By boosting them on X, Mr. Musk seems to be spurring a further radicalization of the British right, along the lines of Mr. Trump’s so-called hostile takeover of the Republican Party.

Reform U.K. was always assumed to be the beneficiary of Mr. Musk’s interventions, but he is fickle with his favor. When the party’s leader, Nigel Farage, refused to jump on the “Free Tommy Robinson” bandwagon, Mr. Musk suddenly turned against him; it’s unclear whether his rumored plans to financially support the party still stand. Since then, he has praised Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader who has adopted his talking points and inflammatory language with vigor. It looks as if Mr. Musk is testing both of them, to see which leader is more eager to be his mouthpiece.

Whoever prevails will join a long list of Mr. Musk’s far-right friends around the globe. He speaks regularly with Vladimir Putin, counts Benjamin Netanyahu as an ally and was at Mar-a-Lago when Mr. Trump met with Viktor Orban, Hungary’s authoritarian leader, in December. He’s on good terms with Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s far-right prime minister, and last year presented her with a global citizenship award. Most recently, he wrote an article in support of the far-right Alternative for Germany, interviewed the party’s co-leader live on X and made a surprise video appearance at a campaign rally. Across the continent, his clout is only growing.

Lately, Mr. Trump’s critics have taken to referring to Mr. Musk as America’s “co-president” — a description they hope will annoy a man who isn’t known for sharing power or attention. Time will tell whether Mr. Musk keeps his coveted position at the president’s side. Mr. Trump’s surprising praise of Mr. Starmer, after months of intense criticism from his right-hand man, could be seen as an early rift or at least a sign that Mr. Musk’s influence has its limits.

But it also underscores that Mr. Musk has his own agenda. His taste for power, as his fixation with Britain shows, clearly goes beyond America. As he solidifies himself as an authority figure in an increasingly connected Western right, it looks as if he wants to become more than just a wealthy kingmaker. Maybe he wants to be king?

nyt
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Tue 28 Jan, 2025 03:04 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Mr. Trump’s surprising praise of Mr. Starmer, after months of intense criticism from his right-hand man, could be seen as an early rift or at least a sign that Mr. Musk’s influence has its limits.


It could be something as facile as the fact he's not Mr. Starmer, he's Sir Kier Starmer, a knight of the realm.

You know how Trump likes to think of himself as royalty.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2025 at 02:22:26