28
   

The 47th President and the Post-Biden World

 
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Jan, 2026 10:58 pm
https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/7b/32/7f/7b327f8439a25c34163adca8879f6140.jpg
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  3  
Reply Sat 3 Jan, 2026 11:02 pm
Olga Nesterova‬
‪@onestpress.onestnetwork.com‬
· 1h
Colombian President Petro commenting on the US;

“A clan of pedophiles wants to destroy our democracy. To keep Epstein's list from coming out, they send warships to kill fishermen & threaten our neighbor with invasion for their oil."
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 04:34 am
Quote:
Today was the legal deadline for the Department of Justice to submit to Congress a written justification for any documents from the Epstein files that the department had redacted or withheld. But it seems unlikely the Justice Department met this deadline because it has missed the December 19 deadline for releasing the files themselves. Both of those deadlines were established by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed overwhelmingly by Congress on November 19, 2025.

Information from those files continues to trickle out. Those that have been released suggest the Department of Justice considered charging “co-conspirators” and that Trump traveled on Epstein’s private plane with Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell, along with alleged victims, on several occasions. Mar-a-Lago routinely sent employees to perform massages and other spa services at Epstein’s home, where he exposed himself to those employees. According to Daniel Ruetenik of CBS News, video released on December 23 and 24, 2025, contradicts previous statements about the surveillance system in the prison in which sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was found dead in August 2019.

Trump has taken a hit on his domestic policy lately, as well. After the Supreme Court on December 23, 2025, rejected the administration’s argument that it had the power to deploy federalized National Guard troops in and around Chicago, Trump announced on December 31 that the administration is removing National Guard troops from Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland. Then he claimed that the troops had “greatly reduced” crime in those cities and vowed to “come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again—Only a question of time!”

“Donald Trump’s lying again,” Democratic Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker posted on social media. “He lost in court when Illinois stood up against his attempt to militarize American cities with the National Guard. Now Trump is forced to stand down.” “If President Trump has finally chosen to follow court orders and demobilize our troops,” said Democratic Oregon governor Tina Kotek, “that’s a big win for Oregonians and for the rule of law.”

And then, on New Year’s Eve, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee released a 255-page transcript of former special counsel Jack Smith’s December 17 closed-door testimony before the committee. The fact they chose to release it at a time when most Americans are not paying attention to the news tells you all you need to know about what Smith said. Republicans have insisted that Smith’s indictments of Trump were a sign that former president Joe Biden’s Justice Department was “weaponized” against Trump and MAGA supporters, but in his testimony—under oath—Smith said Trump was guilty.

As Parker Molloy covered in The Present Age, Smith said that his office had “developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that President Trump engaged in a criminal scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election and to prevent the lawful transfer of power. Our investigation also developed powerful evidence that showed that President Trump willfully retained highly classified documents after he left office in January of 2021, storing them at his social club, including in a ballroom and a bathroom. He then repeatedly tried to obstruct justice to conceal his continued retention of those documents.” Smith told the committee that the evidence for the indictment came not from the president’s enemies, but from Republicans who had worked for Trump, campaigned for him, and wanted him to win in 2020.

It is against this backdrop that the Trump administration launched a strike against Venezuela in the early hours of Saturday, January 3. Without consulting Congress, officials ordered the military to seize president Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, flying them to New York City to face federal charges newly announced by the Southern District of New York.

Trump insists that Maduro is working with the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to attack the U.S. with illegal narcotics. This has been the justification for U.S. strikes on small boats, apparently from Venezuela, that the administration claims have been trafficking drugs to the U.S. The administration has implied the deadly drugs it claims the boats are trafficking are illicit fentanyl, although it has told Congress they were transporting cocaine, which it has now indicted Maduro for trafficking.

But aside from drugs, Trump and his cronies have also increasingly emphasized their conviction that Venezuela “stole” oil from the U.S. and must return it. This appears to be a reference to the loss of U.S. rigs, pipelines, and other facilities when Venezuelan president Carlos Andrés Pérez nationalized the oil companies operating within its borders on January 1, 1976, although Trump might mean the expansion of those seizures under president Hugo Chávez starting in 2007.

This morning, Trump informed the American people of what had happened in Caracas by calling in to Fox & Friends on the Fox News Channel from Mar-a-Lago to describe the strikes and the extraction of Maduro and Flores. He praised the team and boasted that no other country could have done what the U.S. did. “I mean, I watched it literally like I was watching a television show. And, uh… if you would’ve seen the speed, the violence—you know they say that, ‘the speed, the violence,’ they use that term—it’s uh, just, it was an amazing thing, an amazing job that these people did.”

In a midday press conference, members of the administration fleshed out the story of what they are calling “Operation Absolute Resolve.” Although Secretary of State Marco Rubio tried to emphasize that the attack and extraction of Maduro and Flores were a law enforcement mission, Trump made it clear the goal was regime change in order to gain control of Venezuela’s oil. The administration acted unilaterally, without consulting Congress, and in apparent violation of international law.

Slurring his words and repeating himself as he read from a script and occasionally wandered off it, Trump called the operation “an assault like people have not seen since World War II” and said it was “one of the most stunning effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history.”

Trump said the U.S. will “run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition,” evidently not interested in supporting Edmundo González, the former diplomat who beat Maduro in the 2024 presidential election.

Trump turned immediately to Venezuela’s oil industry, saying that it had been “a total bust…pumping almost nothing by comparison to what they could have been pumping.” He explained that “We’re going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country.” “This partnership of Venezuela with the United States of America,” he said, “will make the people of Venezuela rich, independent, and safe.”

If such a mission required U.S. troops on the ground in Venezuela, he said, the administration was not afraid of such deployment.

The president launched into the language of his rally speeches—rote by now—before returning to oil. Although international law is clear that countries own the natural resources within their own territories, he claimed that Venezuela had “unilaterally seized, and sold American oil, American assets and American platforms, costing us billions and billions of dollars…. They took all of our property. It was our property. We built it…and they stole it through force. This constituted one of the largest thefts of American property in the history of our country, considered the largest theft of property in the history of our country.”

And then he hit on the larger foreign policy principle his attack on Venezuela is designed to establish. “America will never allow foreign powers to rob our people and drive us back into and out of our own hemisphere,” he said. He said that the U.S. has now replaced the 1823 Monroe Doctrine—which he called “a big deal” that we “forgot” without explaining that it warned foreign countries from colonizing South America—with the “Donroe Document”: American dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

After World War II, the United States and its allies and partners put in place a rules-based international order to prevent future world conflicts. Under that order, the members of the United Nations agreed they would not threaten or attack another country. Russian president Vladimir Putin has sought to replace that rules-based order with the idea that powerful countries will create spheres of influence in their regions. That new world order would justify Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Now the U.S. invasion of Venezuela with the promise that the U.S. is going to “run” the country from now on, as part of its quest to dominate the Western Hemisphere, means the U.S. has abandoned the post–World War II international order and is siding with Russia’s vision.

“By proceeding without any semblance of international legitimacy, valid legal authority or domestic endorsement, Mr. Trump risks providing justification for authoritarians in China, Russia and elsewhere who want to dominate their own neighbors,” wrote the New York Times editorial board. That justification seems to be the point.

Trump warned Colombia’s president Gustavo Petro that he has to “watch his ass,” said “Cuba is going to be something we’ll end up talking about,” and warned that “something will have to be done about Mexico.” “American dominance in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again,” he said. Katie Miller, wife of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, posted an image of Greenland covered with an American flag and the caption “SOON.”

When Maduro arrived in New York City tonight, official White House social media channels, including that of the president, showed him on his perp walk.

By afternoon, though, the triumphal story seemed to be sagging.

The New York Times reported that at least 40 civilians and military personnel were killed in the attack, which hit a three-story apartment building.

Although Trump told reporters that Venezuelan vice president Delcy Rodríguez had been sworn into the presidency and that she seemed willing to work with the U.S. “to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” Rodríguez insisted in a televised address to Venezuelans today that Maduro is the rightful president of Venezuela and must be released, and said the U.S. had “launched an unprecedented military aggression.” “If there is one thing that the Venezuelan people and this country are clear about,” she said, “it is that we will never again be slaves, that we will never again be a colony of any empire, whatever its nature.”

Ben Lefebvre, Zack Colman, and James Bikales of Politico reported that oil companies are leery of Trump’s plan that they will invest billions of dollars in rebuilding Venezuela’s oil industry. Two sources told the journalists that while oil companies would like reimbursement for the equipment and infrastructure they left behind in Venezuela when its government nationalized the oil fields, they are unenthusiastic about Trump’s demand that they invest heavily in rebuilding Venezuela’s destroyed petroleum industry in order to recoup their losses.

They say they have no idea how badly the infrastructure has decayed, and little interest in investing when it is not clear who will be running the country in the future. The administration has failed to reach out to oil executives with a long-term plan, experts told the journalists. One source said “it feels very much a shoot-ready-aim exercise.”

That lack of preparation appears to be in keeping with the overall post-raid planning. Trump told reporters today that administration officials were “designating various people” to “run” Venezuela, “and we’re gonna let you know who those people are.” Tonight Robbie Gramer and Juan Forero of the Wall Street Journal said the administration is “racing to assemble an interim governing structure for Venezuela” but noted that “[t]he lack of details about what comes next led some U.S. officials to question why there was no detailed plan in place well before deposing Maduro.”

Gramer and Forero noted that Venezuela is twice the size of California and has 28 million people in it, millions of whom continue to support Maduro, whose government remains largely intact. Those supporters include armed cocaine-trafficking groups, some of whom fought as guerillas in Colombia, and an army of more than 100,000 soldiers.

Current and former U.S. officials told the reporter that the next phase of Trump’s operation in Venezuela is full of risks and the potential for blunders.

hcr
hightor
 
  5  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 04:39 am
@Brandon9000,
Quote:
Obama used the military whenever and wherever he pleased and he didn't ask Congress.


That's pretty weak, even coming from you.

If "Obama did it too" is the best you can come up with you might want to provide an example. Such as the time Obama invaded a foreign country which was not conducting hostile military actions against the USA or its interests, kidnapped its leader, jailed him in Brooklyn, and vowed to run the country himself. When did that happen?
hightor
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 05:00 am
Trump Hints at Next Targets After Shocking Invasion

The president warned the Colombian president that he needs to “watch his a--.”

Josh Fiallo wrote:
President Donald Trump has hinted that the surprise abduction of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro may not be his last operation in Latin America.

Trump, 79, suggested on Fox & Friends Saturday that action could be taken against Mexico, an ally of the U.S., which he said is run by drug cartels—a similar allegation he made against Maduro and Venezuela.

“Something’s going to have to be done with Mexico,” he said.

Trump then issued an even more explicit threat to Colombia, which borders Venezuela to the west, and its president, Gustavo Petro, during a Mar-a-Lago news conference.

“I stick by my first statement. He’s making cocaine,” Trump said of Petro. “They’re sending it into the United States, so he does have to watch his a--.”

Petro, 65, has been described as Colombia’s first left-wing leader in its modern history.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with Trump at his side, also threatened Cuba and claimed that it was the root of many of Venezuela’s problems. Rubio, 54, is the son of Cuban migrants.

“This poor island took over Venezuela in some cases,” Rubio said. “One of the biggest problems Venezuelans have is they have to declare independence from Cuba—they tried to basically colonize it from a security standpoint.”

Next came a veiled threat.

“If I lived in Havana and I was in the government, I’d be concerned at least a little bit,” he said.

Trump added of Cuba, “The people there have suffered for many years. I think Cuba is something that we’ll end up talking about, because they’re a badly failing nation.”

When asked earlier Saturday about Mexico by Fox’s Griff Jenkins, Trump responded that the cartels have more power than its democratically elected left-wing president, Claudia Sheinbaum, whom Trump clashed with early in MAGA 2.0 over immigration and the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico.

Trump said that Sheinbaum, 63, has rejected offers of American military aid to take action against the cartels, claiming she has told him, “No, no, no, Mr. President. No, no, no, please.”

Trump then hinted that he might order action in Mexico anyway, claiming that drugs coming over the southern border are killing Americans by the hundreds of thousands and that “something’s going to have to be done with Mexico.”

Trump said that he remains friendly with Sheinbaum and that strikes against Venezuela, which were carried out without Congressional approval, were not meant to send a message to her.

“She’s a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico,” Trump continued. “She’s not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. And we could be politically correct and be nice and say, Oh yes, she is. No, no. She’s very, you know, she’s very frightened of the cartels. They’re running Mexico. And I’ve asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels?”

Jenkins, 55, suggested earlier on the program that Sheinbaum may need to be concerned.

“Trump’s message is very clear that ‘the drug trafficking must stop.’ When I hear that, I think, what must Claudia Sheinbaum, the president of Mexico, be thinking? What message does this operation potentially set up for her now?”

Jenkins noted that Sheinbaum immediately condemned Trump’s attack on Venezuela, citing the Charter of the United Nations

“The Government of Mexico strongly condemns and rejects the military actions carried out unilaterally in recent hours by armed forces of the United States of America,” her government said in a statement. “Based on its foreign policy principles and its pacifist vocation, Mexico makes an urgent call to respect international law, as well as the principles and purposes of the UN Charter, and to cease any act of aggression against the Venezuelan government and people.”

Jenkins asked Fox host Sean Hannity if he thinks the overnight attack in Venezuela has Sheinbaum worried.

“Do you think that she must be wondering what this all means for her?” Jenkins asked.

Hannity responded, “One hundred percent. I mean, the Mexican president, the Colombian president—I know you had the guest on who is running for Colombian president, and I think that all of those leaders have to be looking over their shoulder as far as what that means and where this goes.”

Trump revealed on the program that the U.S. had a “second wave” ready to go early Saturday morning, but did not proceed with it. With Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, already in custody, it is not clear what else American forces might have struck.

Trump noted on Fox that American forces were injured in the operation, but none were killed.

On Fox, Trump suggested that additional strikes would be carried out in Venezuela if things did not change with Maduro’s absence.

“What is the future look like for the Maduro loyalists who are still in Caracas, and I assume, have not yet fled or been removed?” asked Jenkins.

Trump responded, “Well, if they stay loyal, the future is really bad, really bad for them.”

The president reiterated his threat at his late-morning news conference.

“All political and military figures of Venezuela should know what happened to Maduro can happen to them, and it will happen to them if they do bad to their people,” he said.

db
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 05:16 am
@bobsal u1553115,
That's not what I meant.

This is being portrayed as simple, Maduro gone, America takes over, end of.

The regime is still in place, Venezuelan soldiers have been reinforced by Bolivian soldiers and Colombian paramilitaries.

It's far from over.

This is a huge distraction from Epstein, healthcare and cost of living, all of which will still be there when the dust settles down.

Lots of soft targets throughout Latin America, not just Americans.

Trinidad and Tobago are trying to distance themselves after having US radar stations installed 7 miles off Venezuela.

That's not to mention Putin and Xi taking this as a green light for their own imperialism.

We've already had Chinese live fire exercises off Taiwan in the last week.

And it's kicking off in Iran, these regimes may think if they're going out, they're going out with a bang.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 05:19 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:

Quote:


(snip)

Slurring his words and repeating himself as he read from a script and occasionally wandered off it, Trump called the operation “an assault like people have not seen since World War II” and said it was “one of the most stunning effective and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history.”
(snip)

hcr


Well...Trump was, surprisingly, truthful there. But why he would want to compare what he did with what Hitler did by invading Poland and Czechoslovakia is beyond me.

I wonder why he did that?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 05:23 am
@hightor,
I stopped being surprised by the weakness of Brandon's responses a long time ago.

In many ways he's similar to Oralloy.

1 Demand evidence of common knowledge, in own words.
2 Accuse everyone of mind reading
3 Whataboutism
4 Set own rules and claim victory.
5 Lickspittle reverence for the wealthy and contempt for working people.

I think that's even less than Oralloy, he had eight responses.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 06:28 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:
Mind reading arguments are automatically invalid.
In the course of his press conference Trump threatened Cuba and Colombia, while in an earlier interview he even suggested Mexico might be next.

Okay, Cuba is what I think. So it could well be Colombia or Mexico, I admit.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 06:43 am
What does the US coup in Venezuela say about the balance of power in the world? Does the brutal law of the strongest now apply quite bluntly?

This picture posted by Katie Miller is revealing. She is Stephen Miller's wife... ... ...

Quote:
https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/a92761de6eb0.png

"SOON" = within a short time; quickly.
All caps is used as an alternative to rich-text "bolding" for a single word or phrase, to express emphasis.

Homeland Security Adviser Stephen Miller is likely to be a driving force behind Trump's Greenland fantasies. Shortly before Christmas, the US president reiterated the US's urgent claim to the island, which belongs to Denmark. ‘We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals,’ he said at a press conference in Palm Beach, Florida.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 07:44 am
@hightor,
However, there are similarities in this matter, namely the cases of Nicolás Maduro and Juan Orlando Hernández.
These Latin American strongmen were charged in Manhattan by the same prosecutor’s office with corrupting their governments, using state power to import hundreds of tons of cocaine into the United States.

The former president of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernández was pardoned by Trump.
“The man that I pardoned was, if you could equate it to us, he was treated like the Biden administration treated a man named Trump,” Mr. Trump said, adding, “This was a man who was persecuted very unfairly. He was the head of the country.”

Both the Hernández and Maduro cases began as Drug Enforcement Administration investigations around 2010, were investigated by the same D.E.A. unit and were handled by the same investigative unit in the Southern District. (nyt)



0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 09:23 am
Following the overthrow of Maduro by the US, the Council of Europe expresses concern in a statement and compares Venezuela to Ukraine.
Statement by the Secretary General on the situation in Venezuela
Quote:
Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset has issued the following statement regarding the situation in Venezuela:

“Reports from Venezuela mark a moment of profound uncertainty for the Venezuelan people, and for international stability and security.

“This situation cannot be reduced to a binary choice between condemnation and support. It reveals a deeper shift in an emerging world order where force is normalised and law is weaponised.

“As a multilateral regional organisation dedicated to democracy, human rights, and the rule of law, the Council of Europe considers that any use of force on the territory of another state raises serious questions under international law, including the core principles of the United Nations Charter of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference.

“The Council of Europe knows from its engagement on Ukraine how fragile international law becomes once the use of force is normalised. That is why consistency and credibility matter.

“A transition in Venezuela must be peaceful, democratic, and respectful of the will of the Venezuelan people. Democracy can prevail only if it is reclaimed by Venezuelans themselves, through an inclusive political process, credible elections, and the restoration of democratic institutions that command public trust.

“The risk today is a deepening of polarisation in Venezuela, across the region and globally between those who condemn a serious breach of international law and those who see it as justified. These fractures weaken the foundations of international security.

“Whether we call it regime change or foreign influence, too often different standards are applied, shaped by strategic interests or ideological proximity rather than by shared and consistent legal principles.

“International law is universal, or it is meaningless. Democracy is resilient when it is freely chosen, institutionally protected, and grounded in legality. A world governed by exceptions, double standards, or competing spheres of influence is a more dangerous world.”
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 11:01 am
@Walter Hinteler,
How is it possible we have come to this state?

Why have so many Americans tossed long-held ideal aside for the jackass in the White House?

I hope the world community solidifies around a way to contain Trump. It is not America that is the problem...IT IS TRUMP.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  3  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 11:57 am

https://i.ibb.co/6RB92Jwp/Screenshot-20260104-122102-Facebook.jpg
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 12:34 pm
The president told The Atlantic that Delcy Rodríguez needs to comply with U.S. wishes—or else.

Trump Threatens Venezuela’s New Leader With a Fate Worse Than Maduro’s
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 01:18 pm
@Walter Hinteler,

Denmark urges 'respect' after Trump aide's wife posts on Greenland
Quote:
Denmark has urged the US to respect its "territorial integrity", after the wife of one of Donald Trump's top aides tweeted a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag.
[...]
Responding to the post by Ms Miller - a right-wing podcaster and former aide to Trump during his first term - Mr Soerensen said: "Just a friendly reminder about the US and the Kingdom of Denmark: We are close allies and should continue to work together as such.

"US security is also Greenland's and Denmark's security. Greenland is already part of NATO. The Kingdom of Denmark and the United States work together to ensure security in the Arctic."
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 01:58 pm
Twenty-six member states of the European Union have issued a joint statement on the situation in Venezuela. The statement says that the aim is to ‘avoid escalation and ensure a peaceful resolution to the crisis.’ This requires ‘calm and restraint.’ The EU is in contact with the US and other international partners on this matter.

Hungary is the only EU member state that does not support the statement.

The right of the Venezuelan people to determine their own future must be respected, and human rights and ‘the principles of international law and the Charter of the United Nations must be upheld in all circumstances,’ the statement continues. At the same time, the EU states emphasise that they themselves have ‘repeatedly stated that Nicolás Maduro does not have the legitimacy of a democratically elected president.’ Drug trafficking and organised crime are problems that must be tackled, but ‘with full respect for international law and the principles of territorial integrity and sovereignty.’ Twenty-six member states of the European Union have issued a joint statement on the situation in Venezuela. The aim is to ‘avoid escalation and ensure a peaceful resolution to the crisis,’ the statement said. This requires ‘calm and restraint.’ The EU is in contact with the US and other international partners on this issue. Hungary is the only EU member state not to support the statement.

Venezuela: Statement by the High Representative on the aftermath of the U.S. intervention in Venezuela
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Sun 4 Jan, 2026 08:27 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Australia's PM response was even more dismal.

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/10/36/92/103692bb66f35b6456e0f77a8833c09f.jpg


Too much "Maduro is problematic" and not enough "we really shouldn't be normalising the abduction of foreign heads of state".
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Mon 5 Jan, 2026 02:07 am
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/b8/35/2f/b8352fccdd398be0b696e2dacf793a5d.jpg
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jan, 2026 04:00 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Greenland's head of government, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, has clearly rejected Trump's claim to the island. ‘Enough is enough,’ Nielsen declared on Facebook on Monday night. "No more pressure. No more hints. No more annexation fantasies. We are open to dialogue. We are open to discussion,‘ wrote the Greenlandic head of government. However, he emphasised that this must be done ’through the appropriate channels and with respect for international law."
Facebook
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/07/2026 at 04:41:52