squinney wrote:I wouldn't know where to start on selecting a third party that doesn't already have some stigma / image that would cause people to pause.
I wouldn't want a Nader or Perot association.
Also, not sure who "owns" the other parties or runs them. Would they allow use of their party for such a movement?
would we want to co-op an existing party ? that would defeat the purpose.
shouldn't the vision be to collect the moderates from both of the major parties, along with straglers(sic?) from others, such as the libertarian party i'm registered with, and create an entirely new party ?
surely theres a lot of us who like some of our party's platform, but wonder what the hell they were thinking on other things ?
and to follow up on bear's comments... of course, we will need to seek out our own,new candidates. really... in a nation of nearly 300 million people, we have only a couple of thousand that are qualified for public office ?
the whole point of this party would be to set up a tent for those of us who've had enough of the partisan and social bickering.
it's only pie in the sky as long as we want it to be.